The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation
Abstract
Laursen and S alter (2006) examined the impact of a firm's search strategy for external knowledge on innovative performance. Based on organizational learning and open innovation literature, we extend the model hypothesizing that the search strategy itself is impacted by firm context. That is, both ‘constraints on the application of firm resources’ and the ‘abundance of external knowledge’ have a direct impact on innovative performance and a firm's search strategy in terms of breadth and depth. Based on a survey of Swiss‐based firms, we find that constraints decrease and external knowledge increases innovative performance. Although constraints lead to a broader but shallower search, external knowledge is associated with the breadth and the depth of the search in a U ‐shaped relationship . Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164
Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905 · Cited by 2,565
Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth
Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.807 · Cited by 1,341
Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry
Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150505 · Cited by 1,166
Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00061-1 · Cited by 772
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact
Argote, L., & Greve, H. R. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0280 · Cited by 606
Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00118-9 · Cited by 526
Cited by
The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004 · Cited by 1,083
Zhang, W., Xu, F., & Wang, X. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12093841 · Cited by 129
Systematic review on environmental innovativeness: A knowledge-based resource view
Pham, D. D. T., Paillé, P., & Halilem, N. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.221 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Garriga, H., von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1134-1144
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1686648511
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 90.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.2049
- The paper
- Garriga, H., von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. (2013). How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
