The DOI matches its Crossref record; 154 of the 154 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action
Abstract
Research summary: Exploiting opportunities is critical to a firm's competitive advantage. Not surprisingly, there has been considerable interest in the processes by which top managers allocate attention to potential opportunities. Although such investigations have largely focused on top‐down processes for allocating attention to the environment, some studies have explored bottom‐up processes. In this article, we consider both top‐down and bottom‐up processing to develop a model by which top managers form opportunity beliefs for strategic action depending on the allocation of transient and sustained attention. Specifically, this attentional model provides insights into how a top manager's attention is allocated to identify potential opportunities from environmental change and explores how different modes of attentional engagement impact the likelihood of forming beliefs about radical and incremental opportunities requiring strategic action . Managerial summary: Managers are interested in noticing and exploiting opportunities because the exploitation of an opportunity represents an important strategic action. Noticing and exploiting opportunities depends on how and where top managers allocate their attention. Managers can focus attention based on their knowledge and experience or as a result of something in the environment capturing their attention. In this paper, we consider both knowledge‐driven and environment‐driven processes for allocating attention to form opportunity beliefs. This opportunity belief arises from a two stage process. The first stage explains how a top manager identifies environmental changes as potential opportunities. The second stage explains how the top manager forms a belief that these identified environmental changes represent a radical or incremental opportunity worthy of exploitation . Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006) · The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,506
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 · Cited by 10,220
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393549 · Cited by 8,357
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009 · Cited by 7,283
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540
Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258441 · Cited by 5,013
Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change
Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165852 · Cited by 4,950
Cited by
Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises
Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318793196 · Cited by 1,001
The Lean Startup Framework: Closing the Academic–Practitioner Divide
Shepherd, D. A., & Gruber, M. (2021) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258719899415 · Cited by 459
Self-citationToward a Cognitive View of Signalling Theory: Individual Attention and Signal Set Interpretation
Drover, W., Wood, M. S., & Corbett, A. C. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12282 · Cited by 320
Mental Disorders in the Entrepreneurship Context: When Being Different Can Be An Advantage
Wiklund, J., Hatak, I., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2018) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0063 · Cited by 231
Self-citationA Call for Research on the Scaling of Organizations and the Scaling of Social Impact
Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258720950599 · Cited by 145
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shepherd, D. A., Mcmullen, J. S., & Ocasio, W.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-02-22
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 626-644
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2292387351
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 154
- FWCI
- 52.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.2499
- The paper
- Shepherd, D. A., Mcmullen, J. S., & Ocasio, W. (2017). Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.