Cited by 883Management and Organizational PracticesOrganizational Strategy and CultureOrganizational Management and Leadership

The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance

Wooldridge, Bill, Floyd, Steven W.·1990·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a study investigating the strategic involvement of middlelevel managers in 20 organizations. The results suggest that involvement in the formation of strategy is associated with improved organizational performance. Consensus among middle‐level managers, defined as strategic understanding and commitment, is related to involvement in the strategic process but not to organizational performance. Implications for research and the management of the strategic process are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.4250110305

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
231-241
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
OpenAlex
W2124210013
Cited by
883
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 49
FWCI
23.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
Keywords
strategic process, organizational performance, strategic consensus, strategic commitment, strategic management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review