The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders' pressure approach
Abstract
The objective of this article is to analyze the strategies or patterns of adaptation of firms for responding to environmental requirements or expectations. We specifically analyze the influence of the different pressure agents or stakeholders on the degree of proactivity of these patterns. We therefore propose and validate four types of environmental response pattern, representing particular configurations of both the scope of environmental objectives and their allocation of internal resources. The analysis, which is focused on a sample of 240 industrial firms, provides empirical evidence enabling us to identify, understand, and evaluate the impact of stakeholders on the choice of environmental response pattern. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 · Cited by 2,362
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.2307/256973 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/256942 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00500-3 · DOI
- Bagozzi RP, 1980, Causal Models in Marketing (Theories in Marketing Series)
- Bagozzi RP, 1982, A Second generation of multivariate analysis, Volume 2: Measurement and Evaluation, 145
- Bagozzi RP, 1982, A Second generation of multivariate analysis Volume 2: Measurement and Evaluation, 5
- 10.1177/002224298404800102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00135-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.441 · DOI
- Bentler PM, 1995, EQS structural equations program manual
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.563 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.299 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1556360 · DOI · Paper page
- Cohen MA, 2001, Information as a policy instrument in protecting the environment: what have we learned?, Environmental Law Reporter, 31, 10,425
- 10.2307/1556358 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00182-0 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.536 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1556356 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/14720700410547512 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00169.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
- Hahn R, 1992, Economics incentives for environmental protection: integrating theory and practice, American Economic Review, 82, 464
- 10.2307/258963 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1006356928957 · DOI
- 10.2307/256876 · DOI · Paper page
- Hunt C, 1990, Proactive environmental management: avoiding the toxic trap, Sloan Management Review, 31, 7
- 10.2307/259184 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0006-3223(96)84228-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1556362 · DOI · Paper page
- McDonald RP, 1985, Factor Analysis and Related Methods
- 10.2307/257544 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/259247 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jeem.2000.1148 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/1099-0836(200009/10)9:5<328::AID-BSE259>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 10.1108/09534819410061388 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0161-8938(97)80001-4 · DOI
- Rivera P, 2002, Latent Variable and Latent Structure Models (Qualitative Methodology Series), 85
- 10.1002/bse.3280010104 · DOI · Paper page
- Satorra A, 1994, Latent Variables Aanalysis: Applications for Developmental Research (SAGE Focus Editions), 399
- 10.1002/bse.3280010106 · DOI
- 10.2307/1556361 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.439 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199901/02)8:1<46::AID-BSE179>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
- Steger U, 1993, Environmental Strategies for Industry: International Perspectives on Research Needs and Policy Implications (The Greening of Industry Network Series), 147
- 10.4337/9781843767091.00012 · DOI
- 10.1016/0925-5273(96)00040-0 · DOI
Cited by
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 · Cited by 2,755
An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual
Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0718 · Cited by 722
Guerci, M., Longoni, A., & Luzzini, D. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1065431 · Cited by 589
Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders?
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2010) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.002 · Cited by 519
Market-oriented sustainability: A conceptual framework and propositions
Crittenden, V. L., Crittenden, W. F., Ferrell, L. K., Ferrell, O. C., & Pinney, C. C. (2011) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0217-2 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Murillo‐Luna, J. L., Garcés‐Ayerbe, C., & Rivera‐Torres, P.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-25
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1225-1240
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2071648506
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders' pressure approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.711
- The paper
- Murillo‐Luna, J. L., Garcés‐Ayerbe, C., & Rivera‐Torres, P. (2008). Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders' pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
