Cited by 48Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsCongenital Anomalies and Fetal SurgeryFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

Thymic–thoracic ratio in fetuses with trisomy 21, 18 or 13

Open access
Karl, K., Heling, K. ‐S., Sarut Lopez, A., Thiel, G., Chaoui, R.·2012·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: To assess thymic size expressed as the thymic–thoracic ratio (TT‐ratio) in fetuses with trisomy 21, 18 or 13. Methods: The TT‐ratio, the quotient of the anteroposterior thymic and the intrathoracic mediastinal diameter, was measured in 65 trisomic fetuses between 15 and 36 weeks' gestation, including 30 cases with trisomy 21, 19 with trisomy 18 and 16 with trisomy 13. In addition these 65 fetuses were divided into two groups, according to whether they showed growth that was appropriate‐for‐gestational age (AGA) (n = 39) or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (n = 26). Measurements were compared with reference ranges from 302 normal fetuses. Results: The TT‐ratio was low in 27.7% (n = 18) of the 65 fetuses with aneuploidy. In comparison to normal fetuses (mean TT‐ratio, 0.44), those with trisomy 18 or 21 had a significantly smaller TT‐ratio (mean, 0.38 (P < 0.001) and 0.40 (P < 0.05), respectively), while those with trisomy 13 did not (mean, 0.43). These values were not as low as those observed previously in fetuses with del.22q11, suggesting a mechanism involving accelerated thymic involution rather than primary thymic hypoplasia. Furthermore, the TT‐ratio was significantly lower than normal in both AGA (P < 0.05) and IUGR (P < 0.001) fetuses. Conclusion: Fetuses with trisomy 18 or 21, but not trisomy 13, have a small thymus, suggesting accelerated thymic involution in utero. IUGR may contribute to the reduced thymic size in trisomy 18 fetuses. Trisomy 21 fetuses seem to have additional factors leading to a small thymus which could be a possible confirmation of the reduced immune response observed in fetuses and neonates with Down syndrome. Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.11068

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Copyright  2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 412-417. 14690705, 2012, 4, · DOI
  2. Copyright  2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 412-417. 14690705, 2012, 4, · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karl, K., Heling, K. ‐., Sarut Lopez, A., Thiel, G., & Chaoui, R.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Chaoui, R.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-25
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
412-417
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2039853301
Cited by
48
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
fetal thymus, Down syndrome, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, fetal growth restriction, thymic involution, thymic hypoplasia, fetal aneuploidy, fetal immune response, prenatal diagnosis
MeSH terms
Trisomy 13 Syndrome, Adult, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18, Down Syndrome, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Gestational Age, Humans, Male, Organ Size, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Thorax, Thymus Gland, Trisomy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Chromosome Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review