Cited by 109Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsCongenital Heart Disease StudiesGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

The thymic–thoracic ratio in fetal heart defects: a simple way to identify fetuses at high risk for microdeletion 22q11

Open access
Chaoui, R., Heling, K.‐S., Sarut Lopez, A., Thiel, G., Karl, K.·2011·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: To establish reference ranges for the fetal thymic–thoracic ratio (TT‐ratio) and to compare results with those from fetuses with congenital heart defects (CHD) with and without microdeletion 22q11 (del.22q11), a condition known to be associated with a hypoplastic thymus. Methods: TT‐ratio was defined as the quotient of the anteroposterior thymic to the intrathoracic mediastinal diameters measured in the three vessels and trachea view. This ratio was measured in a prospective cross‐sectional study of 302 normal healthy fetuses between 15 and 39 weeks' gestation. The study group comprised two groups: one group (CHDn) consisted of 90 fetuses with CHD and a normal karyotype with no del.22q11 and the other group (CHD 22) included 20 fetuses with CHD and a normal karyotype but with proven del.22q11. Results: The TT‐ratio of the normal fetuses did not show any statistically significant change during gestation, with a mean value of 0.44. The values of all 90 fetuses of the CHDn group were within the normal range and no different from normal fetuses. However, 19 of the 20 (95%) fetuses in the CHD 22 group had a significantly smaller TT‐ratio (P < 0.001) compared with both the CHDn group and the normal fetuses, having a mean value of 0.25. Conclusions: The TT‐ratio is reliable and easy to obtain during fetal echocardiography. Fetuses with CHD and a low TT‐ratio can be considered at high risk of having microdeletion del.22q11. Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.8952

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chaoui R. Fetal echocardiography: state of the art of the state of the heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 277-284.
  2. Chaoui R, Korner H, Bommer C. Prenatal assessment of the thymus in detecting fetuses with del22q11. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 82 (Abstract).
  3. Chaoui R, Heling K, Mielke G, Hofbeck M, Gembruch U. [Quality standards of the DEGUM for performance of fetal echocardiography]. Ultraschall Med 2008; 29: 197-200.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaoui, R., Heling, K. ‐., Sarut Lopez, A., Thiel, G., & Karl, K.
Affiliations
  • Zentrum für Pränataldiagnostik (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Chaoui, R.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-04
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
397-403
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2028947642
Cited by
109
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
fetal cardiac anomalies, 22q11.2 microdeletion, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, thymic hypoplasia, fetal echocardiography, prenatal diagnosis, reference values
MeSH terms
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22, Cross-Sectional Studies, Echocardiography, Female, Genetic Markers, Gestational Age, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Karyotyping, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Thymus Gland, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Gene Deletion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review