Cited by 71Congenital Heart Disease StudiesPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsCongenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery

The fetal three-vessel and tracheal view revisited

Gardiner, Helena, Chaoui, Rabih·2013·Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

The routine use of four-chamber screening of the fetal heart was pioneered in the early 1980s and has been shown to detect reliably mainly univentricular hearts in the fetus. Many conotruncal anomalies and ductal-dependent lesions may, however, not be detected with the four-chamber view alone and additional planes are needed. The three-vessel and tracheal (3VT) view is a transverse plane in the upper mediastinum demonstrating simultaneously the course and the connection of both the aortic and ductal arches, their relationship to the trachea and the visualization of the superior vena cava. The purpose of the article is to review the two-dimensional anatomy of this plane and the contribution of colour Doppler and to present a checklist to be achieved on screening ultrasound. Typical suspicions include the detection of abnormal vessel number, abnormal vessel size, abnormal course and alignment and abnormal colour Doppler pattern. Anomalies such as pulmonary and aortic stenosis and atresia, aortic coarctation, interrupted arch, tetralogy of Fallot, common arterial trunk, transposition of the great arteries, right aortic arch, double aortic arch, aberrant right subclavian artery, left superior vena cava are some of the anomalies showing an abnormal 3VT image. Recent studies on the comprehensive evaluation of the 3VT view and adjacent planes have shown the potential of visualizing the thymus and the left brachiocephalic vein during fetal echocardiography and in detecting additional rare conditions. National and international societies are increasingly recommending the use of this plane during routine ultrasound in order to improve prenatal detection rates of critical cardiac defects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.siny.2013.01.007

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardiner, H., & Chaoui, R.
Corresponding author
Chaoui, Rabih
Venue
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
261-268
ISSN
1744-165X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106363860
Cited by
71
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
Keywords
fetal echocardiography, conotruncal anomalies, colour Doppler, aortic arch, superior vena cava, tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, double aortic arch, aberrant right subclavian artery, right aortic arch, truncus arteriosus, coarctation of the aorta, thymus, left brachiocephalic vein
MeSH terms
Coronary Vessel Anomalies, Coronary Vessels, Female, Fetal Heart, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Models, Cardiovascular, Pregnancy, Trachea, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Fetal Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review