The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of programs for reducing the stigma associated with mental disorders. a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Open accessAbstract
The stigma associated with mental disorders is a global public health problem. Programs to combat it must be informed by the best available evidence. To this end, a meta-analysis was undertaken to investigate the effectiveness of existing programs. A systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO and Cochrane databases yielded 34 relevant papers, comprising 33 randomized controlled trials. Twenty-seven papers (26 trials) contained data that could be incorporated into a quantitative analysis. Of these trials, 19 targeted personal stigma or social distance (6,318 participants), six addressed perceived stigma (3,042 participants) and three self-stigma (238 participants). Interventions targeting personal stigma or social distance yielded small but significant reductions in stigma across all mental disorders combined (d=0.28, 95% CI: 0.17-0.39, p<0.001) as well as for depression (d=0.36, 95% CI: 0.10-0.60, p<0.01), psychosis (d=0.20, 95% CI: 0.06-0.34, p<0.01) and generic mental illness (d=0.30, 95% CI: 0.10-0.50, p<0.01). Educational interventions were effective in reducing personal stigma (d=0.33, 95% CI: 0.19-0.42, p<0.001) as were interventions incorporating consumer contact (d=0.47, 95% CI: 0.17-0.78, p<0.001), although there were insufficient studies to demonstrate an effect for consumer contact alone. Internet programs were at least as effective in reducing personal stigma as face-to-face delivery. There was no evidence that stigma interventions were effective in reducing perceived or self-stigma. In conclusion, there is an evidence base to inform the roll out of programs for improving personal stigma among members of the community. However, there is a need to investigate methods for improving the effectiveness of these programs and to develop interventions that are effective in reducing perceived and internalized stigma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The pooled mean effect size across these studies was not statistically significant (d+ = 0.16; 95% CI [-0.41, 0.73], p = 0.57)”
From Self-help interventions to reduce self-stigma in people with mental health problems: A systematic literature review (2020) · cites this paper as Griffiths et al., 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“They identified three studies targeting self- or internalised-stigma, all of which compared the effect of a group intervention with a control condition.”
From Self-help interventions to reduce self-stigma in people with mental health problems: A systematic literature review (2020) · cites this paper as Griffiths et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Social contact had a consistently positive effect on reducing stigmatising attitudes, perceived stigma in help seeking, and social distance.186,195,198,[203][204][205][206][207][208]”
From The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health (2022) · cites this paper as [186]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Tarsilla, M. (2010) · Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation · doi:10.56645/jmde.v6i14.284 · Cited by 5,232
Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies
Corrigan, P. W., Morris, S. B., Michaels, P. J., Rafacz, J. D., & Rüsch, N. (2012) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201100529 · Cited by 1,680
How Many Studies Do You Need?: A Primer on Statistical Power for Meta-Analysis
Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/1076998609346961 · Cited by 1,294
Link, B. G., Struening, E. L., Rahav, M., Phelan, J. C., & Nuttbrock, L. (1997) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2955424 · Cited by 1,226
On the Self-Stigma of Mental Illness: Stages, Disclosure, and Strategies for Change
Corrigan, P. W., & Rao, D. (2012) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371205700804 · Cited by 1,208
Stigma about depression and its impact on help-seeking intentions
Barney, L. J., Griffiths, K. M., Jorm, A. F., & Christensen, H. (2006) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01741.x · Cited by 844
Self-citationGriffiths, K. M., Christensen, H., Jorm, A. F., Evans, K., & Groves, C. (2004) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.185.4.342 · Cited by 789 · cited 5×
“Griffiths et al (17) Australia CBT Online AC 525, general population/”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThree Strategies for Changing Attributions about Severe Mental Illness
Corrigan, P. W., River, L. P., Lundin, R. K., Penn, D. L., Wasowski, K. U., Campion, J., Mathisen, J., Gagnon, C., Bergman, M., Goldstein, H., et al. (2001) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006865 · Cited by 784
Prejudice, Social Distance, and Familiarity with Mental Illness
Corrigan, P. W., Edwards, A. B., Green, A. J., Diwan, S., & Penn, D. L. (2001) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006868 · Cited by 690
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Heilbig, 2007, A minimal intervention for waiting list patients in outpatient behavior therapy, Verhaltenstherapie, 17, 109
- Schenner, 2011, Communicate instead of stigmitizing - does social contact with a depressed person change attitudes, Neuropsychiatrie, 25, 199
- Borenstein, 2005, Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2, Engelwood: Biostat
- Higgins, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.1.0
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kahn, R. S., Sommer, I. E., Murray, R. M., Meyer‐Lindenberg, A., Weinberger, D. R., Cannon, T. D., O’Donovan, M. C., Correll, C. U., Kane, J. M., van Os, J., et al. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.67 · Cited by 1,163
The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health
Thornicroft, G., Sunkel, C., Alikhon Aliev, A., Baker, S., Brohan, E., el Chammay, R., Davies, K., Demissie, M., Duncan, J., Fekadu, W., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01470-2 · Cited by 748
Interventions to reduce discrimination and stigma: the state of the art
Gronholm, P. C., Henderson, C., Deb, T., & Thornicroft, G. (2017) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1341-9 · Cited by 401
Community mental health care worldwide: current status and further developments
Thornicroft, G., Deb, T., & Henderson, C. (2016) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20349 · Cited by 374
Morgan, A. J., Reavley, N. J., Ross, A., Too, L. S., & Jorm, A. F. (2018) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.05.017 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, K. M., Carron-Arthur, B., Parsons, A., & Reid, R.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University; Acton Canberra ACT 0200 Australia
- Department of Defence (AU)
- Venue
- World Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-175
- ISSN
- 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4102289
- OpenAlex
- W2019025429
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1059620)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Keywords
- mental health stigma, stigma reduction interventions, personal stigma, social distance, perceived stigma, self-stigma, educational intervention, online intervention, depression, psychosis, mental illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
