Cited by 789Mental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effect of web-based depression literacy and cognitive–behavioural therapy interventions on stigmatising attitudes to depression: Randomised controlled trial

Open access
Griffiths, Kathleen M., Christensen, Helen, Jorm, Anthony F., Evans, Kimberley, Groves, Chloe·2004·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the efficacy of educational interventions for reducing the stigma associated with depression. Aims: To investigate the effects on stigma of two internet depression sites. Method: A sample of 525 individuals with elevated scores on a depression assessment scale were randomly allocated to a depression information website (BluePages), a cognitive–behavioural skills training website (MoodGYM) or an attention control condition. Personal stigma (personal stigmatising attitudes to depression) and perceived stigma (perception of what most other people believe) were assessed before and after the intervention. Results: Relative to the control, the internet sites significantly reduced personal stigma, although the effects were small. BluePages had no effect on perceived stigma and MoodGYM was associated with an increase in perceived stigma relative to the control. Changes in stigma were not mediated by changes in depression, depression literacy or cognitive–behavioural therapy literacy. Conclusions: The internet warrants further investigation as a means of delivering stigma reduction programmes for depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.185.4.342

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]5. Corrigan, P.W., River, L. P., Lundin, R. K., Corrigan, P.W., River, L. P., Lundin, R. K., et al et al (2000) (2000) Stigmatizing attributions about mental illness. Stigmatizing attributions about mental illness. Journal of Journal of Community Psychology Community Psychology, , 28 28, 91^102. , 91^102.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffiths, K. M., Christensen, H., Jorm, A. F., Evans, K., & Groves, C.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Griffiths, Kathleen M.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2004-10
Volume
185
Issue
4
Pages
342-349
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1983994076
Cited by
789
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 27
FWCI
14.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression stigma, personal stigma, perceived stigma, online intervention, depression literacy, cognitive behavioral therapy, MoodGYM, educational websites, stigma reduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Perception, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stereotyping, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review