The DOI matches its Crossref record; 212 of the 212 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 18 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence
Open accessAbstract
We report the current best estimate of the effects of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) in the treatment of major depression (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder (PAD) and social anxiety disorder (SAD).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
8 of 18 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“After adding the effect sizes of these unpublished trials to those of the published ones, the mean effect size for psychotherapy dropped by more than 25%.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > (World Psychiatry 2016;15:245-258)
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [15] 15. Driessen E, Hollon SD, Bockting CLH et al. Does publication bias inflate the apparent efficacy of psychological treatment for major depressive disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis of US National Institutes of Health-funded trials. PLoS One 2015;10:e0137864. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Adjusting for study publication bias; page unavailable) report that adding unpublished trials reduced the pooled psychotherapy effect-size estimate from g = 0.52 to g = 0.39. The paper describes this overall reduction as 25%, not more than 25%. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“a recent study found that almost one quarter of trials of psychotherapy for adult depression funded by the US National Institutes of Health were not published 15 .”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > (World Psychiatry 2016;15:245-258)
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [15] 15. Driessen E, Hollon SD, Bockting CLH et al. Does publication bias inflate the apparent efficacy of psychological treatment for major depressive disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis of US National Institutes of Health-funded trials. PLoS One 2015;10:e0137864. source
The Abstract (Methods and Findings) reports that 13 of 55 NIH-funded grants that began psychotherapy trials for major depressive disorder did not result in publications—23.6%, or almost one quarter. The Introduction specifies that the trials concerned adult or geriatric patients. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“There is considerable indirect evidence of publication bias in psychotherapy research, based on excess publication of small studies with large effect sizes 16 .”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > (World Psychiatry 2016;15:245-258)
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [16] 16. Cuijpers P, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E et al. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta- analytic study of publication bias. Br J Psychiatry 2010;196:173-8. source
In “Indicators of publication bias in the full sample,” the funnel plot shows smaller studies with lower effect sizes missing, and statistical tests give highly significant indicators of publication bias. The Discussion describes these as strong indications in controlled studies of psychotherapy for adult depression, supporting the claim’s characterization of indirect evidence. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“However, this was a relatively small drop compared to that reported in other studies on publication bias in psychotherapies for MDD 15,18,184 .”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [15] 15. Driessen E, Hollon SD, Bockting CLH et al. Does publication bias inflate the apparent efficacy of psychological treatment for major depressive disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis of US National Institutes of Health-funded trials. PLoS One 2015;10:e0137864. source
The Results table reports a 25% reduction in the effect-size estimate for psychological treatment versus controls after unpublished studies were included. The Introduction reports a 37% reduction in an earlier study of psychological treatments for depression, supporting the characterization of this paper’s drop as relatively small by comparison. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [18] 18. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Bohlmeijer E et al. The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: a meta-analysis of study quality and effect size. Psychol Med 2010;40:211-23. source
- Supportedcites [184] 184. Cuijpers P, Berking M, Andersson G et al. A meta-analysis of cognitive- behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments. Can J Psychiatry 2013;58:376-85. source
The cited study reports a publication-bias-adjusted effect-size drop for CBT in adult depression, providing one of the comparison results invoked by the citing sentence. In “CBT, Compared With Control Condition” (p. 6), the effect size falls from g = 0.71 to g = 0.53. Describing the citing study’s own drop as relatively small is the citing authors’ comparison, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Psychological treatments are equally effective in the treatment of depression 8 and anxiety disorders [9][10][11] .”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > (World Psychiatry 2016;15:245-258)
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [8] 8. Cuijpers P, Sijbrandij M, Koole SL et al. The efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in treating depressive and anxiety disorders: a meta- analysis of direct comparisons. World Psychiatry 2013;12:137-48. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper reports no significant overall difference between psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy across the depressive and anxiety disorders studied (p. 2). But the Discussion (pp. 10–11) identifies differences for particular disorders, notably psychotherapy’s greater efficacy in OCD. The unqualified claim of equal effectiveness across depression and anxiety disorders therefore overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not matchedcites [9][10][11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In PAD and SAD, we found few indications of publication bias.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first problem, publication bias, mostly affected the outcomes of CBT for GAD and MDD.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We evaluated the quality by the Cochrane”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The difference between studies using a waiting list (g50.96) and either care-as-usual (g50.27) or pill placebo (g50.28) was significant (p<0.001).”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Effects of CBT on PAD
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The pooled effect size of the 31 comparisons between CBT and control conditions in GAD was g50.80 (95% CI: 0.67-0.93;NNT53.58), with low to moderate heterogeneity (I 2 533)”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Effects of CBT on GAD
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 37
- Probably not a substantial claim. 5
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Dozens of trials and several meta-analyses have shown that CBT is effective in treating depression 8,14 and anxiety disorders [9][10][11] .”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > (World Psychiatry 2016;15:245-258)
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [8] 8. Cuijpers P, Sijbrandij M, Koole SL et al. The efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in treating depressive and anxiety disorders: a meta- analysis of direct comparisons. World Psychiatry 2013;12:137-48. source
The introduction (p. 2) describes psychotherapy as an efficacious treatment for depressive and anxiety disorders and cites earlier meta-analyses. The Characteristics of included studies (p. 8) reports dozens of studies across both disorder groups, with CBT accounting for 49 of 78 psychotherapy comparisons. The paper assesses CBT largely through comparisons with medication rather than against no treatment, but its discussion (p. 10) reports small to nonexistent differences for major depression, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites [14] 14. Barth J, Munder T, Gerger H et al. Comparative efficacy of seven psycho- therapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network meta- analysis. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001454. source
The citation to this source is attached to the depression portion of the sentence, not the anxiety-disorders portion. The Results report that CBT was investigated in 139 studies, and the Discussion’s Conclusions report robust effects for CBT in larger trials. The Introduction also describes prior meta-analyses of CBT for depression. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not matchedcites [9][10][11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only 11 of the 63 studies were rated as being high-quality.The effect size in these studies was similar to that in the total pool (g50.73;95% CI: 0.46-1.00;I 2 578).”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Figure 1
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only 25 trials (17.4%) met all four quality criteria, 62 met two or three criteria, and the remaining 57 met one or none of the criteria.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Quality assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 144 trials included a total of 184 comparisons between CBT and a control condition (63 comparisons for MDD, 31 for GAD, 42 for PAD, and 48 for SAD).”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Characteristics of included trials
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 11,030 patients were enrolled (6,229 in the CBT groups, 2,469 in the waiting list control groups, 1,823 in the care-as-usual groups and 509 in the pill placebo groups).”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Characteristics of included trials
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 11,030Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill procedure did not indicate any missing studies and therefore the adjusted and unadjusted effect sizes were the same.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Effects of CBT on PAD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For GAD, it was estimated that about one quarter of the studies were missing and, after adjusting for these missing studies, the effect size dropped from g50.80 to g50.59.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of all included trials, 44 (30.6%) were conducted in 2010 or later.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Characteristics of included trials
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only 9 of the 31 studies were rated as high-quality, and 8 of these used a waiting list control group, so the effects of careas-usual and pill placebo among high-quality studies could not be estimated.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Effects of CBT on GAD
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies using a waiting list control group had significantly (p50.002)larger effect sizes (g50.98;95% CI: 0.80-1.17)than those using care-as-usual (g50.60;95% CI: 0.45-0.75)and pill placebo control groups (g50.55;95% CI: 0.28-0.81)”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Effects of CBT on MDD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill procedure also indicated considerable publication bias (number of imputed studies: 8; adjusted effect size: g50.65; 95% CI: 0.53-0.78;I 2 576).”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Figure 1
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only eight studies were rated as high-quality, and five of these used a waiting list control group.This implies that for SAD there are not enough high-quality studies to assess the effects of CBT compared to care-as-usual or pill placebo.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Effects of CBT on SAD
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the trials conducted in 2010 or later, 29.5% were rated as high-quality, compared to 12.0% of the older studies.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Quality assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill procedure did not indicate missing studies and the adjusted and unadjusted effect sizes were the same.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Effects of CBT on SAD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The four high-quality studies all used a waiting list control group and resulted in an effect size of g50.61 (95% CI: 0.27-0.96).”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Effects of CBT on PAD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 144 trials met inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis: 54 on MDD, 24 on GAD, 30 on PAD, and 36 on SAD.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Selection and inclusion of trials
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For MDD, 14% of the studies were missing, and the pooled effect size dropped from g50.75 to g50.65.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies using a pill placebo control group (g51.32) had a significantly (p<0.001)larger effect than those using a waiting list (g50.85) or care-as-usual control group (g50.45).”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Effects of CBT on GAD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that the overall effects for all four disorders were large, ranging from g50.75 for MDD to g50.80 for GAD, g50.81 for PAD, and g50.88 for SAD.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only 17.4% of the included trials were considered to be high-quality, and this mostly affected the outcomes for PAD (g50.61) and SAD (g50.76).”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that the vast majority of studies for the three anxiety disorders used a waiting list control group (77.4% of the comparisons for GAD, 78.6% for PAD, and 83.3% for SAD).”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, 29.5% of the studies conducted in 2010 or later were rated as high-quality, while that was true for only 12.0% of the older studies.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“that the effects are large when the control condition is waiting list, but small to moderate when it is care-as-usual or pill placebo”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More than 80% of trials in anxiety disorders used waiting list control groups, and the few studies using other control groups pointed at much smaller effect sizes for CBT.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a meta-analysis of 115 trials of psychotherapy for depression, only 11 met all basic indicators of quality, and the effect sizes of these trials were considerably smaller than those of lower quality ones 18 .”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > (World Psychiatry 2016;15:245-258)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [18] 18. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Bohlmeijer E et al. The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: a meta-analysis of study quality and effect size. Psychol Med 2010;40:211-23. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that CBT is probably effective in the treatment of MDD, GAD, PAD and SAD”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The assessment of the quality of included studies was conducted by two independent researchers, and disagreements were solved through discussion.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Quality assessment and data extraction
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in recent years, it has become clear that the effects of CBT and other psychotherapies have been considerably overestimated due to at least three reasons.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > (World Psychiatry 2016;15:245-258)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Publication bias mostly affected the outcomes of CBT in GAD (adjusted g50.59) and MDD (adjusted g50.65), but not those in PAD and SAD.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Psychological placebo conditions were not included, because they have considerable effects on depression 24 and probably also on anxiety disorders 19 .”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Identification and selection of studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [24] 24. Cuijpers P, Driessen E, Hollon SD et al. The efficacy of non-directive sup- portive therapy for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2012;32:280-91. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] 19. Mohr DC, Spring B, Freedland KE et al. The selection and design of con- trol conditions for randomized controlled trials of psychological inter- ventions. Psychother Psychosom 2009;78:275-84. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“because of the small number of high-quality trials, these effects are still uncertain and should be considered with caution.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One possible limitation is that we used strict inclusion criteria, only focusing on trials in which patients met diagnostic criteria for the disorder according to a structured interview and trials in which either a waiting list, care-as-usual or pill placebo control group was used.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The present study has several strengths, including the broad scope of the meta-analyses, covering four common mental disorders, the rigorous selection and assessment of the trials, and their relatively large number.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Waiting list is probably a”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [21] 21. Furukawa TA, Noma H, Caldwell DM et al. Waiting list may be a nocebo condition in psychotherapy trials: a contribution from network meta- analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2014;130:181-92. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in Table 2, very few predictors were significant in these analyses, possibly because of the relatively small number of studies per disorder and the relatively large number of predictors.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > Multivariate meta-regression analyses
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, we only focused on shortterm outcomes, because only few studies reported long-term outcomes and the follow-up periods differed considerably.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because of the small number of high-quality studies, these effects are still uncertain and should be considered with caution.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, care-as-usual control groups can vary considerably depending on the country and the treatment setting where the therapy is offered, and may therefore be too heterogeneous to allow a reliable assessment of the effects across studies.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the basis of our data, we conclude that CBT is probably effective in the treatment of MDD, GAD, PAD and SAD, and that the effects are large when compared to waiting list control groups, but small to moderate when compared to more conservative control groups, such as care-as-usual and pill placebo.”
§ How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“There is a substantial evidence for the efficacy of such targeted treatments 64-66 , and they are recommended as first-line psychological treatments for anxiety and related disorders in several guidelines, including those by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 67 .”
From The clinical characterization of the adult patient with an anxiety or related disorder aimed at personalization of management (2021) · cites this paper as [65]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“whilst the pharmacological [35,36] and psychotherapeutic approaches [37,38] are helpful for many, they do not result in full remission in all patients.”
From Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes (2020) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Meta-analyses 54,60,61 confirm findings from many prior ones 120-122 that when delivered to adults without cancer, CBT in particular, behavior therapy (BT), and BA are the most efficacious treatments for treating MDD.”
From Management of Anxiety and Depression in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update (2023) · cites this paper as [121]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Other meta-analyses have shown that evidence-based psychotherapies have large effect sizes on GAD outcomes. 3”
From Generalized anxiety disorder: 8 studies of psychosocial interventions (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These meta-analyses further suggest that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective in treating GAD.”
From Psychological interventions for generalized anxiety disorder: Effects and predictors in a naturalistic outpatient setting (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The effect sizes found in the current study were unusually large and contrasted with the weighted effect sizes found in a meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and ACT for major depression and GAD (e.g. Cuijpers et al., 2016; Bai et al., 2020).”
From A Multiple-Baseline Evaluation of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Focused on Repetitive Negative Thinking for Comorbid Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Depression (2020) · cites this paper as Cuijpers et al., 2016
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Researchers in this field often start by conducting a ran domized controlled trial (RCT), sometimes referred to as a”
From Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation (2019) · cites this paper as [44]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Use of waitlist controls might inadvertently and artificially inflate effect sizes for both anxiety and depression outcomes39,40.”
From The effectiveness of virtual reality based interventions for symptoms of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The GAD placebo result reverses the claimed control-group pattern
MinorThe discussion says waiting-list comparisons produced significantly larger effects than pill-placebo comparisons for every disorder. For GAD, the results report the opposite: the pill-placebo effect was significantly larger than the waiting-list effect.
“This was confirmed in our metaanalysis, in which we found for each of the disorders that studies with a waiting list control group resulted in significantly higher effect sizes than those with a care-as-usual or pill placebo control group.”
“Studies using a pill placebo control group (g51.32) had a significantly (p<0.001)larger effect than those using a waiting list (g50.85) or care-as-usual control group (g50.45).”
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,586
An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.893 · Cited by 14,407
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Carrington CH., 1979, A comparison of cognitive and analytically oriented brief treatment approaches to depression in black women
- Cullen JM., 2002, Dissertation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–571 of 571
Social Anxiety’s Failure to Establish, Develop, and Maintain Healthy Relationships
Mullen, R. F. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-94512-0_59
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432305
Ryan, G. K., Bauer, A., Endale, T., Qureshi, O., Doukani, A., Pashoja, A. C., Brar, S. K., Eaton, J., & Bass, J. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14478527
Lin, B., Prickett, C., & Woltering, S. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14302767
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432329
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432293
Ryan, G. K., Bauer, A., Endale, T., Qureshi, O., Doukani, A., Pashoja, A. C., Brar, S. K., Eaton, J., & Bass, J. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14478521
Leppänen, H., Kampman, O., Autio, R., Karolaakso, T., Näppilä, T., Rissanen, P., & Pirkola, S. P. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20416461
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432350
Tallon, D., Thomas, L., Brabyn, S., Ching, B. C. F., Hahn, J. S., Jude, B., Logan, M. X., Burrage, A., Fox, F. E., Gilbody, S., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26598524
Ryan, G. K., Bauer, A., Endale, T., Qureshi, O., Doukani, A., Pashoja, A. C., Brar, S. K., Eaton, J., & Bass, J. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14478530
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432290
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432344
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432323
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432308
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432317
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432281
Kappelmann, N., Rein, M., Fietz, J., Mayberg, H. S., Craighead, W. E., Dunlop, B. W., Nemeroff, C. B., Keller, M., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B. A., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12432338
Walter, K. H., Otis, N. P., Ray, T. N., Glassman, L. H., Beltran, J. L., Kobayashi Elliott, K. T., & Michalewicz-Kragh, B. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26569516
Kouri, A., Yamada, J., Lam Shin Cheung, J., Van de Velde, S., & Gupta, S. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19343060
Ryan, G. K., Bauer, A., Endale, T., Qureshi, O., Doukani, A., Pashoja, A. C., Brar, S. K., Eaton, J., & Bass, J. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14478524
Kopf‐Beck, J., Zimmermann, P., Egli, S., Rein, M., Kappelmann, N., Fietz, J., Tamm, J., Rek, K., Lucae, S., Brem, A.-K., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13093877
Kouri, A., Yamada, J., Lam Shin Cheung, J., Van de Velde, S., & Gupta, S. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19343057
Ryan, G. K., Bauer, A., Endale, T., Qureshi, O., Doukani, A., Pashoja, A. C., Brar, S. K., Eaton, J., & Bass, J. K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14478533
Carpati, A., Plutchik, J., Schupak, M., & Sala, M. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.90730
Thew, G. R., Lee, M., Wolsey, I., Giles, F., Hayden, E., Jell, G., Peacock, J., Pimm, J., Ryder, J., Salvadori, A., et al. (2026) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/68671
Hermeneutical injustice in CBT: towards an enactivist paradigm in psychiatric practice
Onstad, J. W. (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2604598 · Cited by 1
Ophir, Y. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08920-7 · Cited by 1
“Depression was chosen not only because of its high prevalence and global impact (WHO, 2022), but also because it has been the focus of extensive research within both CBT and PDT (e.g., Caselli et al., 2023; Cuijpers et al., 2016; Werson et al., 2022; Wienicke et al., 2023).”
Ahmad, F., Khalid, F., Khan, Z., Sanauddin, N., Rahim, M., Sultan, S., Rasool, S., Gul, M., Naeem, F., Khan, F., et al. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.02.12.26346137
Psilocybin-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy for major depressive disorder: A pilot trial
Weintraub, M. J., Jeffrey, J. K., Ichinose, M. C., Bergman, R. L., Shapiro, B., Barnett, G., Artin, H., Lynn, M., Salimian, A., Grody, S., et al. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.121423 · Cited by 1
Ip, V., Jegatheeswaran, S., Cheema, A. A., FitzGerald, M., Wakif, Z., Thind, J. K., Kyte, S., Yung, S., Raiker, R., Ansar, M. A., et al. (2026) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2026.2623505 · Cited by 2
Pavlov, C., Merrill, E., & Limbers, C. A. (2026) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646838.2026.2630338
Jaroszewski, A. C., Arcese, H. T., Ipek, S. I., & Wilhelm, S. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.93695
Noheda, S., Ramírez-Riveros, E., Rodriguez‐Moreno, S., Martín-Azañedo, C., Georgescu, A., & Roca, P. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.93893
Garg, B., Bolton, S.-L., Muthumuni, N., Perera, E., Sareen, J., Sala, T., & Mota, N. P. (2026) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/59700
“…(CBT), which focuses on making changes to maladaptive thoughts and behaviors to improve mental health, is the gold standard in terms of psychotherapy treatment for several mental health disorders and has been extensively researched as effectively reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression [6,7].”
Internet-based CBT for generalized anxiety: a pilot study
Bělohradová, K., Praško, J., Ocisková, M., Pasztor, J., Kantor, K., Maté, Z., Nesnídal, V., Vrbova, K., Vlček, F., Kwolek, D., et al. (2026) · Psychiatrie pro praxi · doi:10.36290/psy.2026.009
Pavani, J. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/16f34d7fz712dz43fbzbefdz3377aaaad9bc
Wang, X., He, H., Lan, J., Guo, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2026.2658745
Novel Psychological Interventions in the Treatment of Unipolar Major Depression
Patierno, C., Carrozzino, D., & Cosci, F. (2026) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6872-7_30
Schoemaker, T., Stevens, A.-E., Lam, D., Veer, J. V. D., Meyer, S., & de Jonghe, J. F. M. (2026) · Archives of Clinical Hypertension · doi:10.17352/ach.000039
Leigh, E., & Waite, F. (2026) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2026.105072
Sunzeri, E., & Sunzeri, F. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14465-2_17
Noheda, S., Ramírez-Riveros, E., Rodriguez‐Moreno, S., Martín-Azañedo, C., Georgescu, A., & Roca, P. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/93893
“Only one-third of treated patients achieve full remission, while a significant proportion does not receive any treatment at all [3,4].”
Methodology and logic of scientific research. Good clinical practice rules
Кожанова, И. Н., & Reutovich, M. Y. (2026) · Medical Journal · doi:10.51922/1818-426x.2026.2.132
Effectiveness and safety of cannabis on anxiety treatment outcomes: a systematic review
Kotecha, P., Pérez-Vilar, S., Lloyd, J. M., Sandhu, S. K., Schoeplein, R., Huang, W., Weiner, J., Naranjo, C., Spin, E., Chatila, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2026.101095
Lee, S., 송지혜, Suh, S. A., & 신윤미 (2026) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-026-08168-w
“This finding may reflect the well-documented paradox in adolescent depression treatment: while combination therapy effectively treats the underlying depressive disorder, its direct impact on suicidal behavior remains uncertain [36].”
Carpati, A., Plutchik, J., Schupak, M., & Sala, M. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/90730
CBT vs. Ericksonian Hypnotherapy for subclinical depression and anxiety: 12-month follow-up
Yılmazer, E., & Çınaroğlu, M. (2026) · American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00029157.2026.2680685
Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and First Nations Population: A Role for Nurses?
Batterbee, R., Doyle, A. K., Arii, K. T., & Hungerford, C. L. (2026) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.70290
“Across the United Kingdom, North America and much of Europe, CBT is endorsed as a primary treatment for depression and related conditions, reinforced by clinical guidelines and a substantial body of empirical support (Barkham et al. 2021; Cuijpers et al. 2016; David et al. 2018).”
Nacker, D., Kalus, L., Seth, A. K., Stone, J. M., Lawson, G., Simpson, J., Sander, J. W. A. S., Bremner, S., Jones, C. I., Wood, W., et al. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.06.17.26355864
Cognitive reappraisal is associated with reduced threat expectancy during social fear extinction
Miño, V., Bacigalupo, F., Quezada-Scholz, V. E., Herrera, L., & Martín, C. S. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107326
Dunne, M., & Moran, T. (2026) · Mental Health Review Journal · doi:10.1108/mhrj-03-2026-0035
Evolutionary Concepts in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Giosan, C., & Vlad, D. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-27009-2_8
Kucab, E., Szpanelewski, K., Kołodziej, R., Kołodziej, A., Klecha, J., Dziki, K., Kula, I. K., Ciemięga, J., Adamiec, W., Danilczuk, D., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science · doi:10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5707
Chow, C.-Y., Wong, V. W.-H., & Ho, F. Y. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.122319 · Cited by 1
Jaroszewski, A. C., Arcese, H., Ipek, S. I., & Wilhelm, S. (2026) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/93695
Ruiz-Muñoz, M., Jiménez‐Pavón, D., Garrido-Palomino, I., Escudier-Vázquez, J. M., de Lara, E. J. V. G., & España‐Romero, V. (2026) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-026-02330-x
“…fitness indicators such as cardiorespira - tory fitness (CRF) and muscular strength [ 13, 38 ]. iCBT has been widely acknowledged for its efficacy in manag - ing depressive disorders [ 39 ], offering not only acute relief but also sustained benefits that support relapse prevention [ 6, 18 ].”
Gray matter volume alterations in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder
Yu, J., Cui, S., Hu, Q., Li, Y., Zhu, D., & Wang, C. (2026) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2026.116426 · Cited by 1
Zhang, Y., Li, T., Chen, Z.-Y., Zeng, P., Su, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2026.1921356
“Psychotherapy is a first-line NPIs treatment for anxiety and depression (Cuijpers et al., 2016).”
Horký, M., & Linhartová, P. (2026) · Psychoterapie · doi:10.5817/psy2025-1-4
Tistuzza, S. H. B. (2026) · Open Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.4236/jss.2026.148043
Falade, T. A. (2026) · Noise and Health · doi:10.4103/nah.nah_249_25 · Cited by 1
Spalding, R., & Allen, C. (2026) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x26100877
“CBT has a strong evidence base for treating both anxiety and depression (Cuijpers et al ., 2016) and is a recommended treatment option by NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2020; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2022).”
Tsang, M. H. L., Chen, J. C., Jiang, H., & Becker, B. (2026) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2026.111918 · Cited by 2
Roepstorff, I. T., Elkjær, E., Arch, J. J., Michalak, J., & O'Toole, M. S. (2026) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-026-10777-4
Wang, T., Cui, S., Zheng, M., Li, Y., Xie, T., & Zhu, D. (2026) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2026.112327
Moreno-Peral, P., Campos-Paíno, H., Morejón, A. R., Cerón, S. C., Rodríguez-Bayón, A., Ballesta-Rodríguez, M. I., Rodríguez‐Sánchez, E., Mendive, J. M., del Hoyo, Y. L., Luna, J. D. D., et al. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0355675
Kaneva, M., Alguacil, D. E., van Genugten, C., & Kleiboer, A. M. (2026) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/98855
Interventions for reducing post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among nurses: A systematic review
Park, J., Park, G., Lee, S., & Lee, H. (2026) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2026.102906
Emery, J. B., Matheson, L. N., Shaw, O., Mannan, N., Cota, M. R., Fu, A., Haight, T. J., & Brody, D. L. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.09.24.26363933
Metadata
- Authors
- Cuijpers, P., Cristea, I. A., Karyotaki, E., Reijnders, M., & Huibers, M. J. H.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
- Venue
- World Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-09-22
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-258
- ISSN
- 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
- 2051-5545
- PMC
- PMC5032489
- OpenAlex
- W2522867222
- Semantic Scholar
- c3394bb499422118f0a59876c9a5e69800873bd2
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 208
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 70.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, anxiety disorders, treatment efficacy, waiting list control group, publication bias, trial quality, placebo comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review