The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys
Open accessAbstract
The social behaviour of many species of non-human primates suggests a capacity for both individual and kin recognition. In these species, the ability to signal and perceive identity at a distance may be an important adaptation facilitating intra-group social communication. Variation in vocalizations is hypothesized to provide a basis for this ability. Playback experiments were conducted to test for vocal recognition of contact calls between adult female rhesus macaques,Macaca mulatta. Single-trial playbacks of the contact call of either a matrilineal relative or a familiar, non-relative group member were used to test for discrimination of kin from non-kin. Females responded significantly faster and longer to the contact calls of matrilineal relatives. A habituation–discrimination paradigm was then used to test for individual recognition. Females habituated to successive presentations of different exemplars of the contact calls of one matrilineal relative, then showed a significant rebound in response to the subsequent presentation of a contact call from a second matrilineal relative. These results indicate an ability for vocal recognition of both individuals and kin. Females' responses to playbacks suggested the additional possibility for categorical recognition of matrilineal kinship, or its correlates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226218526.001.0001 · Cited by 2,268
Cited by
Fitch, W. T. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817779 · Cited by 594
The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research
Taylor, A. M., & Reby, D. (2010) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00661.x · Cited by 407
Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants
McComb, K., Moss, C., Sayialel, S., & Baker, L. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1406 · Cited by 348
Clan mentality: evidence that the medial prefrontal cortex responds to close others
Krienen, F. M., Tu, P.-C., & Buckner, R. L. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2180-10.2010 · Cited by 256
“There is considerable evidence that social species develop mechanisms to aid in identifying and evaluating kin, in-group members, and individuals otherwise relevant to one’s survival (Trivers, 1971; Rendall et al., 1996).”
BackgroundThe behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation.
Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E. W., & Kenrick, D. T. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000104 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- RENDALL, D., RODMAN, P. S., & EMOND, R. E.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1007-1015
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074103494
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/anbe.1996.0103
- The paper
- RENDALL, D., RODMAN, P. S., & EMOND, R. E. (1996). Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Animal Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.