Cited by 257Action Observation and SynchronizationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning Development

Clan mentality: evidence that the medial prefrontal cortex responds to close others

Open access
Krienen, Fenna M., Tu, Pei-Chi, Buckner, Randy L.·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Kinship, friendship alliances, and perceptions of others' beliefs guide social interactions and are central to cohesive group behavior. Under certain conditions, brain systems that involve regions along the frontal midline increase activity when inferences are drawn about others who share a similar view to one's own (similarity). A prominent hypothesis is that these regions contribute to social cognition by simulating the other person's perspective based on one's own experience. An alternative is that certain regions process the social relevance of the person (closeness) to oneself and contribute to the assessment akin to signals that govern behavioral approach responses. These alternatives were explored across four functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments (n= 98). Experiment 1 localized the target midline regions in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex and anterior medial prefrontal cortex by having participants make personal judgments. The two dimensions (similarity, closeness) were crossed in experiment 2 using actual friends of the participant and unknown others. Making judgments about oneself and friends resulted in increased midline response relative to unknown others regardless of whether the friends shared similar views as the participant. Experiment 3 revealed that similarity was not a factor even when close others were not included. Experiment 4 directly contrasted two extremes: participants made inferences about similar, unknown others and dissimilar friends. Judgments about the close others again increased blood oxygenation level-dependent response along the frontal midline. These results encourage further exploration of the idea that frontal systems linked with limbic circuits facilitate assessment of the relevance or personal significance in social contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2180-10.2010

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Framing vmPFC function in terms of meaning helps explain its involvement in complex processes such as courage, closeness, social standing, and the emergence of concepts.

    “Thinking of vmPFC in terms of meaning rather than more basic concepts like affect, value, memory, or visceromotor control also help explain its role in more complex processes not reviewed in depth here, such as ‘courage’ [75], ‘closeness’ [76], ‘social standing’ [77] and ‘the emergence of concepts’ [78] (figure 1m).”
  • The prefrontal cortex is a multimodal structure involved in social cognition, moral judgements, clan mentality, introspection as well as goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention.

    “The prefrontal cortex is a multimodal structure involved in social cognition [44], moral judgements [45], clan mentality [46], introspection [47] as well as goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention [48].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fiske ST Taylor SE 1984 Social Cognition Reading, MA Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
  2. Lorenzi-Cioldi F 1993 They all look alike, but so do we... sometimes: Perceptions of in-group and out-group homogeneity as a function of sex and context British Journal of Social Psychology 32 111 124

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krienen, F. M., Tu, P.-C., & Buckner, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-10-13
Volume
30
Issue
41
Pages
13906-13915
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2005288839
Cited by
256
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 21
FWCI
25.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Simons Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (AG021910, AG-034556, R01AG021910, R01AG034556)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, social cognition, similarity judgments, kinship, friendship, perspective taking, personal meaning, approach behavior, social relevance
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Prefrontal Cortex, Friends, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review