Cited by 133Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 16 are not checked yet; none of the 43 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Bilaterian Origins: Significance of New Experimental Observations

Open access
Peterson, Kevin J., Cameron, R.Andrew, Davidson, Eric H.·2000·Developmental Biology

Abstract

Several recent laboratory observations that bear on the origin of the Bilateria are reviewed and interpreted in light of our set-aside cell theory for bilaterian origins. We first discuss new data concerning the phylogeny of bilaterian phyla. Next, we use systematic, molecular, and paleontological lines of evidence to argue that the latest common ancestor of echinoderms plus hemichordates used a maximal indirect mode of development. Furthermore, the latest common ancestor of molluscs and annelids was also indirectly developing. Finally, we discuss new data on Hox gene expression patterns which suggest that both sea urchins and polychaete annelids use Hox genes in a very similar fashion. Neither utilizes the complete Hox complex in the development of the larva per se, while the Hox complex is expressed in the set-aside cells from which the adult body plan is formed. Our current views on the ancestry of the bilaterians are summarized in phylogenetic terms, incorporating the characters discussed in this paper.

Checked 2026-10-06 · 16 references not checked yet

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/dbio.1999.9475

Cites

113 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 43 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 71 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 26
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 3
28 of 28
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Hox complex is a vectorial patterning system composed of a linked set of genes encoding similar transcription factors.

    “The Hox complex is essentially a vectorial patterning system consisting of a linked set of genes encoding similar transcription factors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The developmental expression of Hox regulators in a linear positional array depends on their chromosomal order.

    “The developmental expression of these regulators in a linear positional array depends in some way yet unclear on their chromosomal order.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Hox complex function is always to specify regulatory states in populations of growing cells.

    “Hox complex function is always to specify regulatory states in populations of growing cells.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The cited tubulin gene changes from beta to alpha

    Minor

    The discussion identifies the gene studied by Damen and van Loon (1996) as beta-tubulin, but the paper's reference entry identifies it as alpha-tubulin-4.

  • Ayala citation year disagrees with the reference list

    Minor

    The figure caption cites Ayala et al. as a 1997 study, whereas the corresponding reference entry gives 1998.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 131 references

2 of the 131 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Haeckel, 1874, die Gastrea-Theorie, die phylogenetische Classification des Thierreichs und die Homologie der Keimblätter, Jena. Z. Naturw., 8, 1
  2. Hyman, L. H. 1959, The Invertebrates, Vol, 5, Smaller Coelomate Groups, McGraw–Hill, New York.
  3. Jablonski, 1986, Larval ecology and macroevolution in marine invertebrates, Bull. Mar. Sci., 39, 565

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peterson, K. J., Cameron, R. A., & Davidson, E. H.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
219
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022880235
Cited by
133
References
131
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9604454)
  • Yale University
  • California Institute of Technology
  • State University of New York
  • University of Washington
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD05753)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Keywords
bilaterian origin, indirect development, Echinodermata, hemichordates, Mollusca, Annelida, Hox genes, sea urchins, Polychaeta, larval development, body plan evolution, common ancestor
MeSH terms
Animals, Annelida, Chordata, Nonvertebrate, Echinodermata, Biological Evolution, Genes, Homeobox, Multigene Family, Invertebrates, Models, Biological, Mollusca, Phylogeny, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review