Cited by 204Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Linking self-regulation and risk proneness to risky sexual behavior: pathways through peer pressure and early substance use

Crockett, Lisa J., Raffaelli, Marcela, Shen, Yuh‐Ling·2006·Journal of Research on Adolescence

Abstract

The linkages between self‐regulation in childhood, risk proneness in early adolescence, and risky sexual behavior in mid‐adolescence were examined in a cohort of children (N=518) from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. The possible mediating role of two early adolescent variables (substance use and negative peer pressure) was also examined. Self‐regulation was assessed by maternal report at ages 8–9, and risk proneness, comprising aspects of sensation seeking and decision making, was assessed by adolescent self‐report at ages 12–13. Structural equation models predicting risky sexual behavior at ages 16–17 indicated that self‐regulation operated partly through early adolescent substance use, whereas risk proneness operated through early adolescent substance use and negative peer pressure. The overall model did not differ significantly for boys and girls, although there were gender differences in the strength of particular paths. These long‐term longitudinal results support the importance of early self‐regulation and risk proneness in setting the stage for adolescent sexual risk taking and implicate substance use and negative peer pressure as processes through which risk proneness and poor self‐regulation lead to risky sexual behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00505.x

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both platonic and romantic peers influence adolescent sexual behavior and adolescents' decisions to engage in romantic and sexual relationships.

    “Both platonic and romantic peers influence adolescent sexual behavior and adolescents’ decisions to engage in romantic and sexual relationships”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crockett, L. J., Raffaelli, M., & Shen, Y.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Crockett, Lisa J.
Venue
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-13
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
503-525
ISSN
  • 1050-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7795
OpenAlex
W2094681130
Cited by
204
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
self-regulation, sexual risk behavior, peer pressure, substance use, sensation seeking, decision-making, mediation, gender differences, early adolescence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review