Cited by 58Obesity, Physical Activity, DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Education

Effects of a community-based diabetes prevention program for latino youth with obesity: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Soltero, Erica G., Olson, Micah L., Williams, Allison N., Konopken, Yolanda P., Castro, Felipe G., Arcoleo, Kimberly J., Keller, Colleen S., Patrick, Donald L. +3 more·2018·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the short‐ and long‐term effects of a community‐based lifestyle intervention among Latino youth with obesity. Methods: Latino adolescents (14‐16 years old) were randomized to a 3‐month lifestyle intervention (n = 67) or comparison control (n = 69) and followed for 12 months. The intervention included weekly nutrition and health classes delivered to groups of families and exercise sessions (3 days/week) delivered to groups of adolescents. Comparison youth received laboratory results and general health information. Primary outcomes included insulin sensitivity and weight‐specific quality of life (QoL) with secondary outcomes of BMI percentile (BMI%), waist circumference, and percent body fat. Results: At 3 months, youth in the intervention group exhibited significant increases in insulin sensitivity (P < 0.05) and weight‐specific QoL (P < 0.001), as well as reductions in BMI%, waist circumference, and percent body fat compared with controls. Increases in weight‐specific QoL and reductions in BMI% and percent body fat remained significant at 12 months (P < 0.001), while changes in insulin sensitivity did not. In a subsample of youth with prediabetes at baseline, insulin sensitivity (P = 0.01), weight‐specific QoL (P < 0.001), and BMI% (P < 0.001) significantly improved at 3 months. Conclusions: Lifestyle intervention can improve cardiometabolic and psychosocial health in a vulnerable population of Latino adolescents at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.22300

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parental involvement in diabetes care and monitoring improves adherence to treatment plans and glycemic control in childhood.

    “Parental involvement in DM care and monitoring has been shown to improve adherencetotreatmentplans as wellasglycemiccontrol in childhood,1498–1500”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1499]

    The Intervention and Discussion sections (pages unavailable) describe family monitoring of lifestyle goals and parents’ role in supporting behavior change. They do not show that parental involvement in diabetes care improves treatment adherence or glycemic control: the Procedures section says youth with diabetes were excluded, and the Discussion reports no significant between-group difference in 2-hour glucose. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soltero, E. G., Olson, M. L., Williams, A. N., Konopken, Y. P., Castro, F. G., Arcoleo, K. J., Keller, C. S., Patrick, D. L., Ayers, S. L., Barraza, E., & Shaibi, G. Q.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Phoenix Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Shaibi, Gabriel Q.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-14
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
1856-1865
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2901302684
Cited by
58
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK10757901)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P20MD002316, U54MD002316)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
Latino adolescents, youth obesity, diabetes prevention, lifestyle intervention, community-based intervention, insulin sensitivity, prediabetes, type 2 diabetes risk, family nutrition education, physical activity, waist circumference, fat mass, cardiometabolic health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review