Cited by 177Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Translation termination factor GSPT1 is a phenotypically relevant off-target of heterobifunctional phthalimide degraders

Ishoey, Mette, Chorn, Someth, Singh, Natesh, Jaeger, Martin G., Brand, Matthias, Paulk, Joshiawa, Bauer, Sophie, Erb, Michael A. +6 more·2018·ACS Chemical Biology

Abstract

Protein degradation is an emerging therapeutic strategy with a unique molecular pharmacology that enables the disruption of all functions associated with a target. This is particularly relevant for proteins depending on molecular scaffolding, such as transcription factors or receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). To address tractability of multiple RTKs for chemical degradation by the E3 ligase CUL4-RBX1-DDB1-CRBN (CRL4 CRBN ), we synthesized a series of phthalimide degraders based on the promiscuous kinase inhibitors sunitinib and PHA665752. While both series failed to induce degradation of their consensus targets, individual molecules displayed pronounced efficacy in leukemia cell lines. Orthogonal target identification supported by molecular docking led us to identify the translation termination factor G1 to S phase transition 1 (GSPT1) as a converging off-target, resulting from inadvertent E3 ligase modulation. This research highlights the importance of monitoring degradation events that are independent of the respective targeting ligand as a unique feature of small-molecule degraders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acschembio.7b00969

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ishoey, M., Chorn, S., Singh, N., Jaeger, M. G., Brand, M., Paulk, J., Bauer, S., Erb, M. A., Parapatics, K., Müller, A. C., Bennett, K. L., Ecker, G. F., Bradner, J. E., & Winter, G. E.
Affiliations
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Bradner, James E.
  • Winter, Georg E.
Venue
ACS Chemical Biology
Published
2018-01-22
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
553-560
ISSN
  • 1554-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8937
OpenAlex
W2785263247
Cited by
177
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P01-CA109901, R01-CA176745)
  • Carlsbergfondet (CF15-0518)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
GSPT1, heterobifunctional degraders, E3 ubiquitin ligase, translation termination factor, sunitinib, PHA-665752, receptor tyrosine kinase, leukemia cell lines, molecular docking
MeSH terms
Humans, Peptide Chain Termination, Translational, Peptide Termination Factors, Phthalimides, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proteolysis, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review