Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 833

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations

Paulus, Paul B, Yang, Huei-Chuan·2000·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
DOI 10.1006/obhd.2000.2888
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/obhd.2000.2888

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Antoszkiewicz, 1992, Brainstorming—Experiences from two thousand teams, Organization Development Journal, 10, 33
  2. Brown, 1998, Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming, Small Group Research, 29, 495, 10.1177/1046496498294005 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Camacho, 1995, The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071, 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071 · Paper page
  4. Diehl, 1987, Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497, 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497 · Paper page
  5. Diehl, 1991, Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392, 10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.392 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.392 · Paper page
  6. Geschka, 1976, Modern techniques for solving problems, International Studies of Managament and Organization, 6, 45, 10.1080/00208825.1976.11656211 · doi:10.1080/00208825.1976.11656211
  7. Greene, 1987, Brainwriting: An effective way to create more ideas, The Quality Circles Journal, 10, 33
  8. Kelly, 1993, Entrainment in small groups, Small Group Research, 24, 179, 10.1177/1046496493242002 · DOI
  9. Kerr, 1983, Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78, 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78 · Paper page
  10. Lamm, 1973, Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming), European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361, 10.1002/ejsp.2420030402 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Madsen, 1978, Comparison of a written feedback procedure, group brainstorming, and individual brainstorming, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 120, 10.1037/0021-9010.63.1.120 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.1.120
  12. Mullen, 1991, Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3, 10.1207/s15324834basp1201_1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mulligan, 1996, Divided attention and indirect memory tests, Memory and Cognition, 24, 453, 10.3758/BF03200934 · DOI
  14. Nagasundaram, 1993, When a group is not a group: The cognitive foundation of group idea generation, Small Group Research, 24, 463, 10.1177/1046496493244003 · DOI
  15. Offner, 1996, The effects of facilitation, recording, and pauses on group brainstorming, Small Group Research, 27, 283, 10.1177/1046496496272005 · doi:10.1177/1046496496272005
  16. Parnes, 1959, Effect of “brainstorming” instructions on creative problem-solving by trained and untrained subjects, Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 171, 10.1037/h0047223 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Paulus, 2000, Groups, teams and creativity: The creative potential of idea generating groups, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 237, 10.1111/1464-0597.00013 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Paulus, 1993, Social influence processes in group brainstorming, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575, 10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.575 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.575 · Paper page
  19. Paulus, 1995, Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 249, 10.1080/01973533.1995.9646143 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Paulus, 1996, Social influence process in computer brainstorming, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 3, 10.1207/s15324834basp1801_2 · DOI
  21. Straus, 1996, Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups, Small Group Research, 27, 115, 10.1177/1046496496271006 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Sutton, 1996, Brainstorming groups in context, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685, 10.2307/2393872 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Valacich, 1994, Idea generation in computer based groups: A new ending to an old story, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448, 10.1006/obhd.1994.1024 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Van de Ven, 1974, The effectiveness of nominal, delphi, and interacting group decision making process, Academy of Management Journal, 117, 605, 10.2307/255641 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 833

Metadata

Authors
Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H.-C.
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-05
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
76-87
ISSN
0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1006/obhd.2000.2888
OpenAlex
W1980974094
Cited by
833
References
2
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/obhd.2000.2888
The paper
Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H.-C. (2000). Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2888

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.