The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Assessment of Goal Commitment: A Measurement Model Meta-Analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408 · cited 1×
“We chose to use a number of popular indices, including the goodness of fit index (GFI; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1984), the non-normed fit index (NNFI; Bentler & Bonett, 1980), the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990) and the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA; Steiger, 1990).”
MethodMethods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338 · Cited by 2,319 · cited 1×
“Goals have emerged as a central, pervasive construct in the motivation literature (Austin & Vancouver, 1996) and task goal theory (Locke & Latham, 1990) has received the bulk of this attention.”
BackgroundTHEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x · Cited by 926
Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: a meta-analysis
Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. (1987) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.416 · Cited by 598 · cited 1×
“For task complexity, the studies were classified as employing low (e.g., perceptual speed, anagrams), moderate (e.g., scholastic course work), or high (e.g., multiple cue probability learning) complexity tasks based on the categories provided by Wood et al. (1987).”
MethodAn Empirical Examination of the Antecedents of Commitment to Difficult Goals
Hollenbeck, J. R., Williams, C. R., & Klein, H. J. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.18 · Cited by 563
Self-citation
Cited by
Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022465 · Cited by 563
Groening, C., & Binnewies, C. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.026 · Cited by 249
APPLYING SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY TO ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH
Sheldon, K. M., Turban, D. B., Brown, K. G., Barrick, M. R., & Judge, T. A. (2004) · Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-7301(03)22008-9 · Cited by 214
Industrial and Organisation Research on Self‐Regulation: From Constructs to Applications
Vancouver, J. B., & Day, D. V. (2005) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00202.x · Cited by 190
The effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task
Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2001) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.70 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wright, P. M., & DeShon, R. P.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-55
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017390709
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Assessment of Goal Commitment: A Measurement Model Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/obhd.2000.2931
- The paper
- Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wright, P. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2001). The Assessment of Goal Commitment: A Measurement Model Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2931
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
