Cited by 73Smoking Behavior and CessationChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Predictors of Smoking Reduction and Cessation in a Cohort of Danish Moderate and Heavy Smokers

Godtfredsen, Nina S, Prescott, Eva, Osler, Merete, Vestbo, Jørgen·2001·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to examine the extent and gender distribution of unassisted tobacco reduction and cessation in a cohort of moderate and heavy smokers and to identify possible predictor variables associated with these changes in smoking behavior. Methods This was a prospective population study of 3,791 moderate and heavy smokers, 15 g tobacco/day or more, who were enrolled in the Copenhagen City Heart Study in 1976-1978 and attended a reexamination 5 years later. Data on smoking behavior were collected at baseline and follow-up. Smoking reduction was defined as a decrease in mean daily tobacco consumption of 10 g or more. Using multivariate logistic regression, subjects who reported reduced smoking or who reported smoking cessation were compared with subjects who continued the habit unchanged. Results After 5 years 13% of the men and 9% of the women had reduced their tobacco consumption, and 9 and 7%, respectively, had quit altogether. Smoking reduction was strongly associated with high tobacco consumption (25+ g/day) at baseline and also with severely impaired lung function (FEV(1) 25). Predictors of smoking cessation included impaired lung function and a tobacco consumption of 15-24 g/day. Additional determinants of smoking reduction and cessation such as inhalation habits and sociodemographic variables differed by gender. Conclusions Several predictors of smoking reduction and cessation were identified, indicating that these subgroups of smokers differ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/pmed.2001.0852

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A positive association of BMI and successful smoking cessation was demonstrated.

    “A positive association of BMI and successful smoking cessation was demonstrated (Twardella et al. 2006, Godtfredsen et al. 2001).”

    From Effects of Smoking Cessation on Hormonal Levels in Men (2013) · cites this paper as Godtfredsen et al. 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godtfredsen, N. S., Prescott, E., Osler, M., & Vestbo, J.
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-07
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
46-52
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994480842
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
smoking cessation, smoking reduction, tobacco use, heavy smokers, lung function, impaired lung function, overweight, body mass index, gender differences, Copenhagen City Heart Study
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Aged, Denmark, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Smoking Cessation, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review