CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 363Social and Intergroup PsychologyViolence, Religion, and PhilosophyPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Groups in Mind: The Coalitional Roots of War and Morality

Tooby, John, Cosmides, Leda·2010·Human Morality and Sociality
DOI 10.1007/978-1-137-05001-4_8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-137-05001-4_8

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Chagnon, N. 1983. The Yanomamo. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  2. Ermer, E. 2007. Coalitional support and the regulation of welfare tradeoff ratios. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
  3. Freud, Sigmund. 1927[1923]. Das Ich und das Es, Internationaler Psychoanalytischer, translated as The Ego and the Id by Joan Riviere. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-analysis.
  4. Hauser, M. 2006. Moral minds. New York: Harper Collins.
  5. Heider, Karl 1970. The Dugum Dani. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
  6. Hobbes, T. 1651. Leviathan, The Matter, forme and power of a common wealth ecclesiasticall and civil. London: Andrew Crooke and William Cooke Publishers.
  7. Hrdy, S. B. 1980. The langurs of Abu. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  8. Sidanius, J., and F. Pratto. 2001. Social dominance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Tooby J. and I. DeVore. 1987. The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In Primate Models of Hominid Behavior, edited by W. Kinzey, 183–237. New York: SUNY Press.
  10. Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides. 1979. Adaptationist approaches to moral phenomena. Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report 79–1.
  11. Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides. 1988. The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report 88–1.
  12. Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides. 2000. Cognitive adaptations for kin-based coalitions: human kinship systems at the intersection between collective action and kin selection. Current Anthropology 41(5):803–4.
  13. Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides. 2008. The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In Handbook of Emotions, edited by M. Lewis and J. M. Haviland-Jones, 3rd edition, 91–115. New York: Guilford.
  14. Turney-High, H. 1949. Primitive war. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
  15. Zimmerman, L. 1981. The Crow Creek Site massacre: A preliminary report. US Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L.
ORCID
Venue
Human Morality and Sociality
Publisher
Macmillan Education UK
Published
2010
Pages
191-234
DOI
10.1007/978-1-137-05001-4_8
OpenAlex
W13376157
Cited by
363
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
48.18
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
coalitions, war, morality, group identity, collective action, political violence, social psychology of war

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review