Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fairness and Retaliation

Fehr, Ernst, Gächter, Simon·2000·The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism
DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-62745-5_7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this chapter we examine evidence from different social sciences and argue that considerations of fairness and retaliation shape human behaviour to a very large degree. We contend that the importance of fairness and retaliation also extends to many important economic decisions. The incorporation of these motivations therefore helps us to understand economic outcomes in many different institutional environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-349-62745-5_7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S.
Venue
The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Published
2000
Pages
153-173
DOI
10.1007/978-1-349-62745-5_7
OpenAlex
W2486146070
Cited by
303
References
4
FWCI
35.56
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fairness and Retaliation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-62745-5_7
The paper
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and Retaliation. The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62745-5_7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.