Cited by 68Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

The Expertise Reversal Effect

Open access
Sweller, John, Ayres, Paul, Kalyuga, Slava·2011·Cognitive Load Theory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_12

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The expertise reversal effect is particularly relevant.

    “The expertise reversal effect is particularly relevant 24 .”

    From AI-induced never-skilling in medical education (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Instructional support that benefits novice learners can be neutral or harmful for experts, because experts bring existing schemas that make additional guidance redundant.

    “Instructional support that benefits novice learners can be neutral or harmful for experts, because experts bring existing schemas that make additional guidance redundant.”

    From AI-induced never-skilling in medical education (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Sweller, John
Venue
Cognitive Load Theory
Published
2011
Pages
155-170
OpenAlex
W4249753135
Cited by
68
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.64
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
expertise reversal effect, cognitive load theory, redundancy effect, expertise level, novice learners, expert learners, instructional design, diagrams, textual explanations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review