Cited by 265Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational and Psychological AssessmentsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning

Open access
Kalyuga, Slava, Sweller, John·2005·Educational Technology Research and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02504800

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Channeling novices into worked examples and advanced students directly into problem solving yielded more efficient learning outcomes.

    “Kalyuga and Sweller (2005) addressed this variability by developing pretests that categorize students as novices or advanced students and showed that channeling the novices into worked examples and the advanced students directly into problem solving yielded more efficient learning outcomes.”
  • For more experienced students, straight problem solving yielded better learning than interleaved worked examples and problem solving.

    “In contrast to the positive results of worked examples for novice students, a number of studies (e.g., Kalyuga et al., 2003Kalyuga et al., , 2005) ) have demonstrated that for more experienced students, straight problem solving yielded better learning than interleaved worked examples and problem solving.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Kalyuga, Slava
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2005-09
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
83-93
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W2166550729
Cited by
265
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 20
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
adaptive e-learning, working memory, cognitive load, long-term memory retrieval, cognitive efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review