Cited by 272Educational Games and GamificationOnline Learning and AnalyticsDigital Games and Media

Casual Social Games as Serious Games: The Psychology of Gamification in Undergraduate Education and Employee Training

Landers, Richard N., Callan, Rachel C.·2011·Serious Games and Edutainment Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_20

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landers, R. N., & Callan, R. C.
Affiliations
Old Dominion University (US)
Corresponding author
Landers, Richard N.
Venue
Serious Games and Edutainment Applications
Published
2011
Pages
399-423
OpenAlex
W2133209125
Cited by
272
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
43.66
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
gamification, serious games, social games, student motivation, online quizzes, social reward, social networking sites, goal setting theory, social media, instructional design, undergraduate education, employee training, psychology of learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review