Cited by 115Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsSocial Representations and Identity

"Social" Cognition and Social Cognition: From the Subjective to the Intersubjective

Ickes, William, Gonzalez, Richard·1994·Small Group Research

Abstract

Following Kuhn, it is proposed that there are two major paradigms for the study of social cognition. The first and most traditional paradigm relies on single-subject designs, and is therefore limited to the study of subjective phenomena. It prescribes that subjects 'responses be kept independent, and treats any interdependence in these responses as a statistical nuisance. In contrast, the second paradigm relies on dyadic and small group designs and addresses both subjective and intersubjective phenomena It prescribes that the naturally occurring interdependence in the subjects' responses be preserved and studied as an important set of phenomena in their own right. This second, intersubjective paradigm may be especially conducive to the integration of research on social cognition with research on social interaction and group dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1046496494252008

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Ickes, W., & Gonzalez, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Small Group Research
Published
1994-05
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
294-315
ISSN
  • 1046-4964 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8278
OpenAlex
W2111698562
Cited by
115
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Small Group Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
social cognition, paradigm shift, single-case experimental design, intersubjectivity, social interaction, group dynamics, Thomas Kuhn

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review