Monte Carlo Statistical Methods

Robert, Christian P., Casella, George·2004·Springer Texts in Statistics

DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 22,066
Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach
Kock, N. (2015) · International Journal of e-Collaboration · doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101 · Cited by 10,215
Rank-Normalization, Folding, and Localization: An Improved Rˆ for Assessing Convergence of MCMC (with Discussion)
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & Bürkner, P.-C. (2021) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/20-ba1221 · Cited by 1,810
Robust Anomaly Detection for Multivariate Time Series through Stochastic Recurrent Neural Network
Su, Y., Zhao, Y., Niu, C., Liu, R., Sun, W., & Pei, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330672 · Cited by 1,804
Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems
Toni, T., Welch, D., Strelkowa, N., Ipsen, A., & Stumpf, M. P. H. (2009) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0172 · Cited by 1,498
Riemann manifold langevin and hamiltonian monte carlo methods
Girolami, M., & Calderhead, B. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00765.x · Cited by 1,473
Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers
Del Moral, P., Doucet, A., & Jasra, A. (2006) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00553.x · Cited by 1,239
Untitled work
Vul (2014) · doi:10.1111/cogs.12101 · Cited by 502
Multiple models to capture the variability in biological neurons and networks
Marder, E., & Taylor, A. L. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2735 · Cited by 451
A trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease
Salloway, S., Farlow, M., McDade, E., Clifford, D. B., Wang, G., Llibre-Guerra, J. J., Hitchcock, J. M., Mills, S. L., Santacruz, A. M., Aschenbrenner, A. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01369-8 · Cited by 359
Significance Analysis of Spectral Count Data in Label-free Shotgun Proteomics
Choi, H., Fermin, D., & Nesvizhskii, A. I. (2008) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m800203-mcp200 · Cited by 364
Lack of confidence in approximate Bayesian computation model choice
Robert, C. P., Cornuet, J.-M., Marin, J.-M., & Pillai, N. S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102900108 · Cited by 317
Self-citation
A review on design of experiments and surrogate models in aircraft real-time and many-query aerodynamic analyses
Yondo, R., Andrés, E., & Valero, E. (2018) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.11.003 · Cited by 311
Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Bayesian Data Analysis in Astronomy
Sharma, S. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122339 · Cited by 298
A new analysis of experimental data on olivine rheology
Korenaga, J., & Karato, S. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2007jb005100 · Cited by 210
Multistability and perceptual inference
Gershman, S. J., Vul, E., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2012) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00226 · Cited by 140
Bayesian system identification based on hierarchical sparse Bayesian learning and Gibbs sampling with application to structural damage assessment
Huang, Y., Beck, J. L., & Li, H. (2017) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2017.01.030 · Cited by 147
ABC likelihood-free methods for model choice in Gibbs random fields
Grelaud, A., Marin, J.-M., Robert, C. P., Rodolphe, F., & Taly, J.-F. (2009) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/09-ba412 · Cited by 119
Self-citation
Joining forces of Bayesian and frequentist methodology: a study for inference in the presence of non-identifiability
Raue, A., Kreutz, C., Theis, F. J., & Timmer, J. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0544 · Cited by 119
Optimal pricing in e-commerce based on sparse and noisy data
Bauer, J., & Jannach, D. (2018) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2017.12.002 · Cited by 92
Variational Mixture-of-Experts Autoencoders for Multi-Modal Deep Generative Models
Shi, Y., Siddharth, N., Paige, B., & Torr, P. H. S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.03393 · Cited by 186
“…VAE (MMVAE) objective With the M O E joint posterior, we can extend the L IWAE in (2) to multiple modalities by employing stratiﬁed sampling (Robert and Casella, 2013) to average over M modalities: which has the effect of weighing the gradients of samples from different modalities equally…”
Method
Models of settlement hierarchy based on partial evidence
Bevan, A., & Wilson, A. (2013) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.025 · Cited by 87
Intensities, interactions and uncertainties: some new approaches to archaeological distributions
(2016) · Computational Approaches to Archaeological Spaces · doi:10.4324/9781315431932-8 · Cited by 64
Counting public transport passenger using WiFi signatures of mobile devices
Myrvoll, T. A., Hakegard, J. E., Matsui, T., & Septier, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2017.8317687 · Cited by 60
Assessing parameter identifiability in phylogenetic models using data cloning
Ponciano, J. M., Burleigh, J. G., Braun, E. L., & Taper, M. L. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys055 · Cited by 39
Using the Monte Carlo simulation methods in gauge repeatability and reproducibility of measurement system analysis
Yeh, T.-M., & Sun, J.-J. (2013) · Journal of Applied Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/s1665-6423(13)71585-2 · Cited by 39
Exploring Differences in Measurement and Reporting of Classroom Observation Inter-Rater Reliability
Wilhelm, A. G., Rouse, A. G., & Jones, F. (2018) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/at67-md25 · Cited by 20
Electric Vehicle Charging/Discharging Models for Estimation of Load Profile in Grid Environments
Kurukuru, V. S. B., Khan, M. A., & Singh, R. (2023) · Electric Power Components and Systems · doi:10.1080/15325008.2022.2146811 · Cited by 17
A Bayesian study for the comparison of generalized gamma model with its components
Mukherjee, B., Gupta, A., & Upadhyay, S. K. (2010) · Sankhya B · doi:10.1007/s13571-011-0006-z · Cited by 15
Adaptive Methods in Machine Learning
Clerc, M., Daucé, E., & Mattout, J. (2016) · Brain–Computer Interfaces 1 · doi:10.1002/9781119144977.ch10 · Cited by 12
Understanding repeat playing behavior in casual games using a Bayesian data augmentation approach
Hui, S. K. (2017) · Quantitative Marketing and Economics · doi:10.1007/s11129-017-9180-2 · Cited by 10

Authors: Robert, C. P., & Casella, G.
Venue: Springer Texts in Statistics
Publisher: Springer New York
Published: 2004
ISSN: 1431-875X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2
OpenAlex: W4292691288
Cited by: 4,271
References: 0
FWCI: 19.08
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review