Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enhanced Biotransformation of Furfural and Hydroxymethylfurfural by Newly Developed Ethanologenic Yeast Strains

Liu, Z. Lewis, Slininger, Patricia J., Gorsich, Steve W.·2009·Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals

Abstract

Furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) are representative inhibitors among many inhibitive compounds derived from biomass degradation and saccharification for bioethanol fermentation. Most yeasts, including industrial strains, are susceptible to these inhibitory compounds, especially when multiple inhibitors are present. Additional detoxification steps add cost and complexity to the process and generate additional waste products. To promote efficient bioethanol production, we studied the mechanisms of stress tolerance, particularly to fermentation inhibitors such as furfural and HMF. We recently reported a metabolite of 2,5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran as a conversion product of HMF and characterized a dose-dependent response of ethanologenic yeasts to inhibitors. In this study, we present newly adapted strains that demonstrated higher levels of tolerance to furfural and HMF. Saccharomyces cerevisiae 307-12H60 and 307-12H120 and Pichia stipitis 307 10H60 showed enhanced biotransformation ability to reduce HMF to 2,5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran at 30 and 60 mM, and S. cerevisiae 307-12-F40 converted furfural into furfuryl alcohol at significantly higher rates compared to the parental strains. Strains of S. cerevisiae converted 100% of HMF at 60 mM and S. cerevisiae 307-12-F40 converted 100% of furfural into furfuryl alcohol at 30 mM. The results of this study suggest a possible in situ detoxification of the inhibitors by using more inhibitor-tolerant yeast strains for bioethanol fermentation. The development of such tolerant strains provided a basis and useful materials for further studies on the mechanisms of stress tolerance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-59259-991-2_39

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Bothast, R. J. and Saha, B. C. (1997), Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 44, 261–286. · DOI
  2. Saha, B. C. (2003), J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30, 279–291. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Luo, G., Brink, D. L., and Blanch, H. W. (2002), Biomass. Bioenergy 22, 125–138. · DOI
  4. Taherzadeh, M. J., Gustafsson, L., and Niklasson, C. (2000), Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 53, 701–708. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Martin, C. and Jonsson, L. J. (2003), Enzyme. Microb. Technol. 32, 386–395. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Sanchez, B., and Bautista, J. (1988), Enzyme. Microb. Technol. 10, 315–318. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Khan, Q. A., and Hadi, S. M. (1994), Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 32, 379–385.
  8. Modig, T., Liden, G., and Taherzadeh, M. J. (2002), Biochem. J. 363, 769–776. · doi:10.1042/0264-6021:3630769 · Paper page
  9. Liu, Z. L., Slininger, P. J., Dien, B. S., Berhow, M. A., Kurtzman, C. P., and Gorsich, S. W. (2004), J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31, 345–352. · doi:10.1007/s10295-004-0148-3
  10. Ho, N. W. Y, Chen, Z., and Brainard, A. P. (1998), Appl. Enviro. Microbiol. 64, 1852–1859. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Jeffries, T. W. and Shi, N. Q. (1999), Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 65, 117–161.
  12. Ostergaard, S., Olsson, L. and Nielsen, J. (2000), Microbiol. Mol. Bio. Rev. 64, 34–50. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hahn-Hagerdal, B., Wahlbom, C. R, Gardony, M., Van Zyl, W. H., Otero, R. R. C, and Jonsson, L. J. (2001), Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 73, 53–84.
  14. Nigam, J. N. (2001), J. Biotechnol. 87, 17–27. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Causton, H. C, Ren, B., Koh, S. S., Harbison, C. T., Kanin, E., Jennings, E. G., Lee, T. I., True, H. L., Lander, E. S., and Young, R. A. (2001), Mol. Biolol. Cell. 12, 323–337. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hohmann, S. (2002), Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 300–372. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gasch, A. P., and Werner-Washbume, M. (2002), Fund. Integr. Genomics 2, 181–192. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Erasmus, D. J., van der Merwe, G. K., and van Vuuren, H. J. J. (2003), Yeast Res. 3, 375–399. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Blomberg, A. (2000), Microbiol. Lett. 182, 1–8. · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb08864.x · Paper page
  20. Mager, W. H. and Siderivs, M. (2002), Yeast. Res. 2, 251–257. · DOI

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Z. L., Slininger, P. J., & Gorsich, S. W.
Venue
Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
2009-03-06
Volume
121-124
Pages
451-460
OpenAlex
W2081384796
Cited by
182
References
0
FWCI
37.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced Biotransformation of Furfural and Hydroxymethylfurfural by Newly Developed Ethanologenic Yeast Strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-59259-991-2_39
The paper
Liu, Z. L., Slininger, P. J., & Gorsich, S. W. (2009). Enhanced Biotransformation of Furfural and Hydroxymethylfurfural by Newly Developed Ethanologenic Yeast Strains. Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-991-2_39

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.