The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhanced Biotransformation of Furfural and Hydroxymethylfurfural by Newly Developed Ethanologenic Yeast Strains
Abstract
Furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) are representative inhibitors among many inhibitive compounds derived from biomass degradation and saccharification for bioethanol fermentation. Most yeasts, including industrial strains, are susceptible to these inhibitory compounds, especially when multiple inhibitors are present. Additional detoxification steps add cost and complexity to the process and generate additional waste products. To promote efficient bioethanol production, we studied the mechanisms of stress tolerance, particularly to fermentation inhibitors such as furfural and HMF. We recently reported a metabolite of 2,5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran as a conversion product of HMF and characterized a dose-dependent response of ethanologenic yeasts to inhibitors. In this study, we present newly adapted strains that demonstrated higher levels of tolerance to furfural and HMF. Saccharomyces cerevisiae 307-12H60 and 307-12H120 and Pichia stipitis 307 10H60 showed enhanced biotransformation ability to reduce HMF to 2,5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran at 30 and 60 mM, and S. cerevisiae 307-12-F40 converted furfural into furfuryl alcohol at significantly higher rates compared to the parental strains. Strains of S. cerevisiae converted 100% of HMF at 60 mM and S. cerevisiae 307-12-F40 converted 100% of furfural into furfuryl alcohol at 30 mM. The results of this study suggest a possible in situ detoxification of the inhibitors by using more inhibitor-tolerant yeast strains for bioethanol fermentation. The development of such tolerant strains provided a basis and useful materials for further studies on the mechanisms of stress tolerance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bothast, R. J. and Saha, B. C. (1997), Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 44, 261–286. · DOI
- Saha, B. C. (2003), J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30, 279–291. · DOI · Paper page
- Luo, G., Brink, D. L., and Blanch, H. W. (2002), Biomass. Bioenergy 22, 125–138. · DOI
- Taherzadeh, M. J., Gustafsson, L., and Niklasson, C. (2000), Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 53, 701–708. · DOI · Paper page
- Martin, C. and Jonsson, L. J. (2003), Enzyme. Microb. Technol. 32, 386–395. · DOI · Paper page
- Sanchez, B., and Bautista, J. (1988), Enzyme. Microb. Technol. 10, 315–318. · DOI · Paper page
- Khan, Q. A., and Hadi, S. M. (1994), Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 32, 379–385.
- Modig, T., Liden, G., and Taherzadeh, M. J. (2002), Biochem. J. 363, 769–776. · doi:10.1042/0264-6021:3630769 · Paper page
- Liu, Z. L., Slininger, P. J., Dien, B. S., Berhow, M. A., Kurtzman, C. P., and Gorsich, S. W. (2004), J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31, 345–352. · doi:10.1007/s10295-004-0148-3
- Ho, N. W. Y, Chen, Z., and Brainard, A. P. (1998), Appl. Enviro. Microbiol. 64, 1852–1859. · DOI · Paper page
- Jeffries, T. W. and Shi, N. Q. (1999), Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 65, 117–161.
- Ostergaard, S., Olsson, L. and Nielsen, J. (2000), Microbiol. Mol. Bio. Rev. 64, 34–50. · DOI · Paper page
- Hahn-Hagerdal, B., Wahlbom, C. R, Gardony, M., Van Zyl, W. H., Otero, R. R. C, and Jonsson, L. J. (2001), Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 73, 53–84.
- Nigam, J. N. (2001), J. Biotechnol. 87, 17–27. · DOI · Paper page
- Causton, H. C, Ren, B., Koh, S. S., Harbison, C. T., Kanin, E., Jennings, E. G., Lee, T. I., True, H. L., Lander, E. S., and Young, R. A. (2001), Mol. Biolol. Cell. 12, 323–337. · DOI · Paper page
- Hohmann, S. (2002), Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 300–372. · DOI · Paper page
- Gasch, A. P., and Werner-Washbume, M. (2002), Fund. Integr. Genomics 2, 181–192. · DOI · Paper page
- Erasmus, D. J., van der Merwe, G. K., and van Vuuren, H. J. J. (2003), Yeast Res. 3, 375–399. · DOI · Paper page
- Blomberg, A. (2000), Microbiol. Lett. 182, 1–8. · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb08864.x · Paper page
- Mager, W. H. and Siderivs, M. (2002), Yeast. Res. 2, 251–257. · DOI
Cited by
Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M., & Negro, M. J. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093 · Cited by 3,912
Almeida, J. R., Modig, T., Petersson, A., Hähn‐Hägerdal, B., Lidén, G., & Gorwa‐Grauslund, M. F. (2007) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.1676 · Cited by 987
Nicolaou, S. A., Gaida, S. M., & Papoutsakis, E. T. (2010) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2010.03.004 · Cited by 538
Pretreatment and Lignocellulosic Chemistry
Hu, F., & Ragauskas, A. (2012) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9208-0 · Cited by 462
Parawira, W., & Tekere, M. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/07388551003757816 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Z. L., Slininger, P. J., & Gorsich, S. W.
- Venue
- Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals
- Publisher
- Humana Press
- Published
- 2009-03-06
- Volume
- 121-124
- Pages
- 451-460
- OpenAlex
- W2081384796
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced Biotransformation of Furfural and Hydroxymethylfurfural by Newly Developed Ethanologenic Yeast Strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-59259-991-2_39
- The paper
- Liu, Z. L., Slininger, P. J., & Gorsich, S. W. (2009). Enhanced Biotransformation of Furfural and Hydroxymethylfurfural by Newly Developed Ethanologenic Yeast Strains. Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-991-2_39
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.