The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
I-SceI-Based Assays to Examine Distinct Repair Outcomes of Mammalian Chromosomal Double Strand Breaks
Abstract
Chromosomal double strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by a number of mechanisms that result in diverse genetic outcomes. To examine distinct outcomes of chromosomal DSB repair, a panel of human cell lines has been developed that contain GFP-based reporters with recognition sites for the rare-cutting endonuclease I-SceI. One set of reporters is used to measure DSB repair events that require access to homology: homology-directed repair, homology-directed repair that requires the removal of a nonhomologous insertion, single strand annealing, and alternative end joining. An additional reporter (EJ5-GFP) is used to measure end joining (EJ) between distal DSB ends of two tandem I-SceI sites. These Distal-EJ events do not require access to homology, and thus are distinct from the repair events described above. Indeed, this assay provides a measure of DSB end protection during EJ, via physical analysis of Distal-EJ products to determine the frequency of I-SceI-restoration. The EJ5-GFP reporter can also be adapted to examine EJ of non-cohesive DSB ends, using co-expression of I-SceI with a non-processive 3' exonuclease (Trex2), which can cause partial degradation of the 4 nucleotide 3' cohesive overhangs generated by I-SceI. Such co-expression of I-SceI and Trex2 leads to measurable I-SceI-resistant EJ products that use proximal DSB ends (Proximal-EJ), as well as distal DSB ends (Distal-EJ). Therefore, this co-expression approach can be used to examine the relative frequency of Proximal-EJ versus Distal-EJ, and hence provide a measure of the fidelity of end utilization during repair of multiple DSBs. In this report, the repair outcomes examined by each reporter are described, along with methods for cell culture, transient expression of I-SceI and Trex2, and repair product analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway
Lieber, M. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131 · Cited by 2,882
XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells
Pierce, A. J., Johnson, R. D., Thompson, L. H., & Jasin, M. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.20.2633 · Cited by 1,379
Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection
Sartori, A. A., Lukas, C., Coates, J., Mistrik, M., Fu, S., Bartek, J., Baer, R., Lukas, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06337 · Cited by 1,362
Alternative-NHEJ Is a Mechanistically Distinct Pathway of Mammalian Chromosome Break Repair
Bennardo, N., Cheng, A., Huang, N., & Stark, J. M. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000110 · Cited by 870
Self-citationDNA Double-Strand Break Repair: All's Well that Ends Well
Wyman, C., & Kanaar, R. (2006) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090451 · Cited by 803
The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends
Stracker, T. H., & Petrini, J. H. J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3047 · Cited by 734
Johnson, R. D. (2000) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/19.13.3398 · Cited by 587
Genetic Steps of Mammalian Homologous Repair with Distinct Mutagenic Consequences
Stark, J. M., Pierce, A. J., Oh, J., Pastink, A., & Jasin, M. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.24.21.9305-9316.2004 · Cited by 501
Self-citationHuman Fanconi anemia monoubiquitination pathway promotes homologous DNA repair
Nakanishi, K., Yang, Y.-G., Pierce, A. J., Taniguchi, T., Digweed, M., D'Andrea, A. D., Wang, Z.-Q., & Jasin, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0407796102 · Cited by 384
Impact of the KU80 Pathway on NHEJ-Induced Genome Rearrangements in Mammalian Cells
Guirouilh-Barbat, J., Huck, S., Bertrand, P., Pirzio, L., Desmaze, C., Sabatier, L., & Lopez, B. S. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.008 · Cited by 335
Cited by
Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination
Jasin, M., & Rothstein, R. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012740 · Cited by 887
Pessina, F., Giavazzi, F., Yin, Y., Gioia, U., Vitelli, V., Galbiati, A., Barozzi, S., Garre, M., Oldani, A., Flaus, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0392-4 · Cited by 360
Peng, Y., Liao, Q., Tan, W., Peng, C., Hu, Z., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Li, J., Zhen, B., Zhu, W., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09232-8 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Gunn, A., & Stark, J. M.
- Venue
- Methods in Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Humana Press
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 920
- Pages
- 379-391
- ISSN
- 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6029
- OpenAlex
- W2413931725
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 20.32
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: I-SceI-Based Assays to Examine Distinct Repair Outcomes of Mammalian Chromosomal Double Strand Breaks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-61779-998-3_27
- The paper
- Gunn, A., & Stark, J. M. (2012). I-SceI-Based Assays to Examine Distinct Repair Outcomes of Mammalian Chromosomal Double Strand Breaks. Methods in Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-998-3_27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.