Cited by 361DNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsRNA Research and Splicing

Functional transcription promoters at DNA double-strand breaks mediate RNA-driven phase separation of damage-response factors

Open access
Pessina, Fabio, Giavazzi, Fabio, Yin, Yandong, Gioia, Ubaldo, Vitelli, Valerio, Galbiati, Alessandro, Barozzi, Sara, Garre, Massimiliano +6 more·2019·Nature Cell Biology

Abstract

Damage-induced long non-coding RNAs (dilncRNA) synthesized at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by RNA polymerase II are necessary for DNA-damage-response (DDR) focus formation. We demonstrate that induction of DSBs results in the assembly of functional promoters that include a complete RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex, MED1 and CDK9. Absence or inactivation of these factors causes a reduction in DDR foci both in vivo and in an in vitro system that reconstitutes DDR events on nucleosomes. We also show that dilncRNAs drive molecular crowding of DDR proteins, such as 53BP1, into foci that exhibit liquid-liquid phase-separation condensate properties. We propose that the assembly of DSB-induced transcriptional promoters drives RNA synthesis, which stimulates phase separation of DDR factors in the shape of foci.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41556-019-0392-4

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SA-β-gal reflects the activity of a lysosomal enzyme that cleaves terminal β-D-galactose residues from β-D-galactosides.

    “One of the most recognizable and common markers of cellular senescence is senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-β-gal)37, which reflects the activity of a lysosomal enzyme that cleaves terminal β-d-galactose residues from β-D-galactosides38.”

    From Guidelines for minimal information on cellular senescence experimentation in vivo (2024) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results passages concern transcription and DNA-damage responses, not SA-β-gal or its enzymatic activity. Searches for SA-β-gal, lysosomal enzyme, galactose, and galactosides found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed cleavage reaction; the References section does not establish it. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pessina, F., Giavazzi, F., Yin, Y., Gioia, U., Vitelli, V., Galbiati, A., Barozzi, S., Garre, M., Oldani, A., Flaus, A., Cerbino, R., Parazzoli, D., Rothenberg, E., & d’Adda di Fagagna, F.
Affiliations
  • IFOM (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • New York University (US)
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Venue
Nature Cell Biology
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1286-1299
ISSN
  • 1465-7392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4679
OpenAlex
W2975196800
Cited by
360
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 2
FWCI
14.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Marie Curie international mobility fellowship part of Structured International Post Doc Program
  • Fondazione Cariplo (2016-0998)
  • Regione Lombardia
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (MFAG 2018-22083)
  • AriSLA
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
DNA double-strand breaks, MED1, CDK9, 53BP1, liquid-liquid phase separation, condensate, macromolecular crowding, nucleosome reconstitution, transcriptional promoter
MeSH terms
Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1, DNA, DNA Repair, Gene Expression Regulation, HeLa Cells, Histones, Humans, Osteoblasts, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA Polymerase II, Transcription, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 9, Cell Line, Tumor, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, Mediator Complex Subunit 1, HEK293 Cells, RNA, Long Noncoding, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review