Cited by 1Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsRobot Manipulation and Learning3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

E3VS-Bench: A Benchmark for Viewpoint-Dependent Active Perception in 3D Gaussian Splatting Scenes

Open access
Sakamoto, Koya, Miyanishi, Taiki, Azuma, Daichi, Kurita, Shuhei, Morikuni, Shu, Chiba, Naoya, Kawanabe, Motoaki, Iwasawa, Yusuke +1 more·2026·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

E3VS-Bench is a new benchmark for embodied 3D visual search in which agents must move a camera with five degrees of freedom inside photorealistic 3D Gaussian Splatting reconstructions to gather evidence that is only visible from particular viewpoints. Across 99 scenes and 2,014 episodes, state-of-the-art vision-language models score far below humans, with the best model averaging 2.79 versus 3.53 on a 1–5 judge scale.

Key findings

  • Human performance averaged 3.53 across the six question categories, while the strongest model, Gemini 3.0 Flash, reached 2.79 and GPT 5.1 reached 2.42 — only modestly above the Random Action baseline of 2.28.
  • Static baselines show the value of viewpoint control: VQA at Goal averaged 3.60 for GPT 5.1 and 4.12 for humans, versus roughly 2.0–2.1 for VQA at Start, blind VLMs, and 2D visual search methods such as SEAL and DyFo.
  • Counting was the hardest category (Gemini 3.0 Flash 1.88; humans 3.59 at goal viewpoints), and the authors attribute this to the need to accumulate evidence along a trajectory rather than from one observation.
  • When episodes were initialized at a goal viewpoint so no exploration was needed, Gemini 3.0 Flash averaged 3.41 with 6.60 steps, whereas Qwen3-VL-8B averaged 3.38 but took 12.06 steps, indicating weaker stopping behavior.
  • Adding input frames (1, 3, 5) did not clearly improve judge scores but consistently reduced navigation steps and collision rates.

Methods

  • The benchmark was built from 105 manually curated 3DGS reconstructions from SceneSplat++ (ScanNet++ scenes), reduced after filtering to 99 scenes and 2,014 episodes drawn from 1,290 unique question-answer pairs; an automated Gemini 2.5 Flash pipeline produced 27,877 candidate QAs over 7,578 instances, followed by human verification, viewpoint labeling, and answerability filtering with GPT-5.1.
  • Episodes are triplets of scene, question, and initial viewpoint; the agent acts in a discrete 5-DoF space (translation, rotation, stop) with 0.25 m moves and 30° rotations, 512×512 images at 90° field of view, and a 25-step budget.
  • Answers are scored 1–5 by a VLM-as-a-judge (GPT 5.1) that sees the question, prediction, ground truth, the agent's final image, and a human-annotated goal image; the paper reports a Spearman correlation of ρ = 0.54 with human evaluation. Splits are scene-level: 1,406 train episodes (68 scenes), 231 validation (10 scenes), 377 test (21 scenes).

Limitations

  • Stated: the VLM-as-a-judge metric correlates only weakly with human judgment, and agents sometimes received similar scores while stopping at viewpoints quite different from the annotated goal, so automated evaluation may not adequately capture viewpoint adequacy.
  • Stated: the work is limited to zero-shot evaluation, with the train and validation splits released but not used for optimization.
  • Evident from the text: answerability filtering used only GPT-5.1, so episodes solvable from the start viewpoint by other models (e.g., Qwen or Gemini) were not removed, which the authors note inflates VQA-at-Start scores for those models and complicates interpretation of categories such as object state.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-032-37464-6_4

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

2 of 6 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    The QA generation pipeline produced 27,877 question-answer pairs across 7,578 instances.

    “This pipeline generates 27,877 QAs across 7,578 instances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The authors manually curated 105 high-quality reconstructed scenes from SceneSplat++, which represents 3D environments from ScanNet++ using 3DGS.

    “First, we manually curate 105 high quality reconstructed scenes from SceneSplat++ [20], which represents 3D environments from Scan-Net++ [38] using 3DGS [13].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Models often perform better on CGS than on explicit OS.

    “Models often perform better on CGS than on explicit OS (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    For SR, Gemini 3.0 Pro achieves E3VS performance comparable to its VQA at Goal performance.

    “For SR, Gemini 3.0 Pro achieves performance on E3VS (Table 2) that is comparable to its VQA at Goal performance (Table 3), which serves as an upper bound given sufficient visual evidence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: VQA at Goal performance serves as an upper bound on performance given sufficient visual evidence.
  • Findingown data

    In some cases, the agent's final observation differs substantially from the human-annotated goal viewpoint while receiving a similar judge score.

    “In some cases, the agent's final observation differs substantially from the human-annotated goal viewpoint while receiving a simi-lar judge score, indicating that current automated evaluation may insufficiently capture viewpoint adequacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 41
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 37
  • Not yet classified. 2
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Traditional mesh-based representations often suffer from texture degradation and geometric oversmoothing, whereas 3DGS preserves the photometric fidelity needed for reliable viewpoint-dependent reasoning.

    “Unlike traditional mesh-based representations that often suffer from texture degradation and geometric oversmoothing, 3DGS preserves the photometric fidelity necessary for reliable viewpoint-dependent reasoning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Ginting, M.F., et al.: Enter the mind palace: reasoning and planning for long-term active embodied question answering. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) (2025) source

      The Related Work section (p. 3) discusses dense 3D representations and scene graphs, while Mind Palace Generation (p. 4) describes viewpoint images stored in a scene graph. Neither passage compares meshes with 3DGS or addresses texture degradation, oversmoothing, or photometric fidelity. Searches for 3DGS, Gaussian splatting, and mesh rendering found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    3D Gaussian Splatting provides photorealistic free-viewpoint rendering that maintains fine visual details such as small text and subtle attributes, which are often lost in mesh-based simulators.

    “3D Gaussian Splatting enables photorealistic free-viewpoint rendering that preserves fine-grained visual details (e.g., small text and subtle attributes) often degraded in mesh-based simulators, thereby allowing the construction of questions that cannot be answered from a single view and instead require active inspection across viewpoints in 5-DoF.”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
      “3DGS enables photorealistic free-viewpoint rendering that preserves subtle visual details, such as fine-grained text and brand logos, which are often degraded in traditional mesh-based representations; importantly, this high-fidelity rendering makes it possible to define tasks where critical visual evidence is only observable from specific viewpoints, thereby necessitating active viewpoint control”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Ginting, M.F., et al.: Enter the mind palace: reasoning and planning for long-term active embodied question answering. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) (2025) source

      Section 4.1 (p. 4) describes storing images from multiple viewpoints, and Section 4.2 (p. 5) describes exploring those viewpoints to answer questions. Neither passage addresses 3D Gaussian Splatting, photorealistic rendering, preservation of small text or subtle attributes, or a comparison with mesh-based simulators. Searches for “Gaussian Splatting” and “mesh-based simulators” found no passage supporting that attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The dataset covers diverse scene categories and has a wide distribution of question and answer lengths.

    “Fig. 4 shows that the dataset covers diverse scene categories and exhibits a wide distribution of question and answer lengths.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After filtering, the dataset contains 99 scenes, 2,014 episodes derived from 1,290 unique question-answer pairs.

    “After meticulous filtering, our dataset contains 99 scenes, 2,014 episodes derived from 1290 unique question-answer pairs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The human annotation process required approximately 1,120 hours of manual effort.

    “The overall human annotation process required approximately 1,120 hours of manual effort.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All evaluated state-of-the-art VLMs show a large performance gap compared to humans despite strong 2D reasoning, indicating limitations in active perception and coherent viewpoint planning under full 5-DoF viewpoint changes.

    “Despite strong 2D reasoning ability, all models exhibit a substantial gap from humans, highlighting limitations in active perception and coherent viewpoint planning specifically under full 5-DoF viewpoint changes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The distribution of actions indicates that every action type is used, even those outside planar movement, which points to a need for 5-DoF active viewpoint control.

    “In addition, the action distribution in Fig. 4(c) shows that all action types are well utilized, including those beyond planar navigation, suggesting the need for 5-DoF active viewpoint control.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The upward movement action is used most often, and looking down is more common than looking up, which implies that useful visual evidence is frequently found by viewing targets from the side or from a slightly higher angle rather than from below.

    “Moreover, move_up is the most frequent action, and look_down appears more often than look_up, suggesting that relevant visual evidence is often obtained by observing target objects from lateral or slightly elevated viewpoints rather than from below.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The backward movement action occurs more often than forward movement, which suggests that moving away from the target to gain context is frequently needed.

    “Notably, move_backward is more frequent than move_forward, indicating that gaining context by moving away from the target is often necessary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    E3VS-Bench contains 99 high-fidelity 3D scenes reconstructed with 3D Gaussian Splatting and 2,014 question-driven episodes.

    “E3VS-Bench consists of 99 high-fidelity 3D scenes reconstructed using 3D Gaussian Splatting and 2,014 question-driven episodes.”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
      “The benchmark contains 99 high-fidelity reconstructed scenes and 2,014 question-driven episodes.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.3 Dataset Statistics and Analysis · plain
      “After meticulous filtering, our dataset contains 99 scenes, 2,014 episodes derived from 1290 unique question-answer pairs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The starting camera position is centered on the target object, yet other objects in the scene may partially or completely block it.

    “The initial viewpoint v 0 is centered on the target object; however, the target may be partially or fully occluded by other objects in the scene.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Gemini 3.0 Flash terminates efficiently, requiring only 6.60 steps on average, whereas Qwen3-VL-8B takes nearly twice as many steps (12.06).

    “Gemini 3.0 Flash terminates efficiently, requiring only 6.60 steps on average, whereas Qwen3-VL-8B takes nearly twice as many steps (12.06), suggesting that Qwen3-VL-8B tends to continue exploring even when sufficient visual evidence is already available.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The benchmark consists of 99 high-fidelity scenes and 2,014 episodes covering diverse reasoning types, including object search, spatial reasoning, attribute recognition, and counting.

    “The benchmark consists of 99 high-fidelity scenes and 2,014 episodes covering diverse reasoning types, including object search, spatial reasoning, attribute recognition, and counting.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Random Action baseline achieves an average score of 2.28.

    “Random Action | 2.38 | 2.18 | 2.60 | 2.20 | 2.50 | 2.00 | 2.28 | 10.15 | | 0.39”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The VLM-as-a-judge scoring provides a valid measure of answer correctness.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Several models demonstrate strong 2D visual reasoning ability.

    “While several models demonstrate strong 2D visual reasoning ability, all evaluated systems exhibit a substantial performance gap compared to human performance on E3VS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Gemini 3.0 models achieve relatively high performance on OA, while other models perform at or below the Random Action baseline.

    “Empirically, while Gemini 3.0 models achieve relatively high performance on OA, other models perform at or below the Random Action baseline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    More input frames do not significantly impact the VLM judge score, but consistently lead to more efficient navigation (fewer steps) and safer trajectories (lower collision rates).

    “While more frames do not significantly impact the VLM judge score, they consistently lead to more efficient navigation (fewer steps) and safer trajectories (lower collision rates).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Multi-frame inputs do not significantly improve VLM Judge scores, but consistently reduce navigation steps and collision rates.

    “As shown in Fig. 6, multi-frame inputs do not significantly improve VLM Judge scores, but consistently reduce navigation steps and collision rates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Models already struggle in the 2D single-view setting, and performance further degrades in the full E3VS setting.

    “Table 3 indicates that models already struggle in the 2D single-view setting, and performance further degrades in the full E3VS setting (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Not yet classified.

    Finding

    The VQA at Start performance of Qwen3-VL-8B is comparable to the E3VS performance of Gemini 3.0 Flash evaluated with GPT 5.1 as the judge.

    “Empirically, we observe that the VQA at Start performance of Qwen3-VL-8B is comparable to the E3VS performance of Gemini 3.0 Flash evaluated with GPT 5.1 as the judge.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Gemini 3.0 Flash achieves the highest average score among evaluated models (2.79).

    “Gemini 3.0 Flash | 3.21 | 2.82 | 3.18 | 3.53 | 2.75 | 1.88 | 2.79 | 11.29 | | 0.43”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The VLM-as-a-judge scoring provides a valid measure of answer correctness.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    E3VS-Bench contains 2,014 episodes.

    “E3VS-Bench | ✓ | 3D-GS SceneSplat++ | 6 DoF | 2,014”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Answers in E3VS-Bench are often longer and contain more descriptive expressions compared to OpenEQA.

    “Compared to OpenEQA, where ground-truth answers typically consist of short phrases or single words, the answers in E3VS-Bench are often longer and contain more descriptive expressions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    VQA at Goal with GPT 5.1 achieves an average score of 3.60.

    “GPT 5.1 | 4.17 | 3.36 | | 3.91 | 4.20 | 3.00 | 2.88 | | 3.60 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The VLM-as-a-judge scoring provides a valid measure of answer correctness.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    VQA at Goal with Human achieves an average score of 4.12.

    “Human | 4.25 | 3.82 | | 4.47 | 4.25 | 4.14 | 3.82 | | 4.12 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The VLM-as-a-judge scoring provides a valid measure of answer correctness.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The high-fidelity rendering from 3DGS allows the creation of tasks where critical visual evidence is only visible from specific viewpoints, thus requiring active viewpoint control in 3D space.

    “thereby allowing the construction of questions that cannot be answered from a single view and instead require active inspection across viewpoints in 5-DoF.”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
      “importantly, this high-fidelity rendering makes it possible to define tasks where critical visual evidence is only observable from specific viewpoints, thereby necessitating active viewpoint control in 3D space.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A large number of questions in E3VS-Bench need detailed, viewpoint-specific evidence like text, object states, or occluded areas, and these cannot be answered without moving to suitable viewpoints.

    “Despite this global visibility, many questions in E3VS-Bench require fine-grained, viewpoint-dependent evidence (e.g., text, object states, or occluded regions), which cannot be resolved without moving to appropriate viewpoints.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing visual search and embodied AI benchmarks, including EQA, generally use static observations or limited egocentric motion, so they do not directly assess fine-grained viewpoint-dependent effects that occur with unrestricted 5-DoF viewpoint control in real 3D environments.

    “However, existing benchmarks and agents remain largely constrained to two-dimensional behaviors [23,32], and therefore do not fully capture or evaluate these capabilities in real-world 3D environments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] Ma, M., et al.: SceneSplat++: a large dataset and comprehensive benchmark for language gaussian splatting. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2025) source
    • cites [32] Su, A., Wang, H., Ren, W., Lin, F., Chen, W.: Pixel reasoner: incentivizing pixel-space reasoning with curiosity-driven reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2025) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The episodes that remain are not solvable using only prior knowledge or the first observation; they demand active 5-DoF viewpoint changes and intentional information gathering to answer correctly.

    “The remaining episodes cannot be solved from prior knowledge or the initial observation alone, and require active 5-DoF viewpoint transitions and deliberate information gathering for accurate answers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Counting requires evidence to be accumulated across a 5-DoF trajectory, which standard EQA approaches based on a single observation cannot handle effectively.

    “Counting requires evidence to be accumulated across a 5-DoF trajectory, which standard EQA approaches based on a single observation cannot handle effectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A viewpoint is considered answerable if the image provides sufficient visual evidence to determine the answer without relying on additional viewpoints.

    “A viewpoint is considered answerable if the image provides sufficient visual evidence to determine the answer without relying on additional viewpoints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Viewpoints that involve camera penetration through scene geometry (e.g., walls or objects) were filtered out and marked red.

    “Viewpoints are marked red if they are filtered out due to camera penetration through scene geometry (e.g., walls or objects).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    OA is highly sensitive to viewpoint selection and requires both exploratory viewpoint discovery and detailed visual recognition.

    “This highlights the difficulty of acquiring fine-grained visual evidence through 5-DoF active viewpoint control, suggesting that OA is highly sensitive to viewpoint selection and requires both exploratory viewpoint discovery and detailed visual recognition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The evaluation protocol requires the judge to verify whether the predicted answer is supported by the available visual evidence in the end image, which further increases the difficulty of automated assessment.

    “In addition, our evaluation protocol requires the judge to verify whether the predicted answer is supported by the available visual evidence in the end image, which further increases the difficulty of automated assessment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    OS requires not only recognizing the target object but also understanding its spatial relations and placement in the scene.

    “In contrast, OS requires not only recognizing the target object but also understanding its spatial relations and placement in the scene.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The model is not only capable of recognizing spatial relationships but also of selecting viewpoints that improve the observability of such relationships.

    “This suggests that the model is not only capable of recognizing spatial relationships but also of selecting viewpoints that improve the observability of such relationships.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    3D scene curation for E3VS-Bench was performed from SceneSplat++.

    “(1) 3D scene curation from SceneSplat++ [20]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Li, G., Xu, J., Zhao, Y., Peng, Y.: DyFo: a training-free dynamic focus visual search for enhancing LMMs in fine-grained visual understanding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 9098–9108 (2025) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The additional spatial reasoning in OS likely increases task complexity and leads to lower performance.

    “This additional spatial reasoning likely increases task complexity and leads to lower performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Answers are required to be concise, objective, and based only on visually observable information.

    “Answers are required to be concise, objective, and based only on visually observable information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    This criterion also implicitly removes many invalid viewpoints, such as those outside the scene or penetrating scene geometry.

    “This criterion also implicitly removes many invalid viewpoints, such as those outside the scene or penetrating scene geometry, where the target object cannot be clearly observed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Human annotators verify automatically generated QA pairs and remove invalid questions, and correct answers when necessary.

    “In Step 3 of the dataset construction pipeline, human annotators verify automatically generated question-answer (QA) pairs and remove invalid questions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    QA generation for E3VS-Bench was performed using a VLM.

    “(2) QA generation using a VLM”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The quality of geometric evidence is highly viewpoint-dependent; comparing object heights is significantly easier from a lateral viewpoint than from an oblique or top-down view.

    “Crucially, the quality of such geometric evidence is highly viewpoint-dependent; for example, comparing object heights is significantly easier from a lateral viewpoint than from an oblique or top-down view.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    A Spearman correlation of ρ = 0.54 with human evaluation supports the validity of the VLM-as-a-judge metric, indicating reasonable agreement with human judgments.

    “The validity of this metric is supported by a Spearman correlation coefficient of ρ = 0.54 with human evaluation, suggesting reasonable agreement with human judgments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Answerability filtering was performed to remove questions solvable without viewpoint transitions.

    “(5) answerability filtering to remove questions solvable without viewpoint transitions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    OA questions require identifying fine-grained, instance-specific properties of a target object, such as text, material, color, or subtle visual features.

    “OA questions require identifying finegrained, instance-specific properties of a target object, such as text, material, color, or subtle visual features.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Invalid QA filtering for E3VS-Bench was performed with human verification.

    “(3) invalid QA filtering with human verification”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The human verification of invalid QA filtering is reliable.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Viewpoint-specific phrases were removed from counting questions to reformulate them to reflect structural properties of target objects.

    “This modification reformulates the questions to reflect the structural properties of the target objects rather than a specific viewpoint (Fig. 13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Annotators identify viewpoints that are physically implausible or visually corrupted and mark them as invalid.

    “Annotators also identify viewpoints that are physically implausible or visually corrupted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Current VLMs possess strong 2D image recognition capabilities.

    “This suggests that while current VLMs possess strong 2D image recognition capabilities, they show”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The VLM-as-a-judge scoring provides a valid measure of answer correctness.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Since answers in E3VS-Bench are open-vocabulary, exact string matching is inadequate for evaluation.

    “Since answers in E3VS-Bench are open-vocabulary, exact string matching is inadequate for evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The end image corresponds to the final observation used by the agent to generate its answer, enabling the judge to verify whether the prediction is supported by the available visual evidence.

    “The end image corresponds to the final observation used by the agent to generate its answer, enabling the judge to verify whether the prediction is supported by the available visual evidence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Models still struggle either to identify the appropriate target viewpoint or to predict the sequence of actions required to reach it, even when the desired viewpoint is relatively clear.

    “This indicates that models still struggle either to identify the appropriate target viewpoint or to predict the sequence of actions required to reach it, even when the desired viewpoint is relatively clear.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Initial viewpoints are often insufficient, which necessitates active exploration.

    “The large performance gap between 'VQA at Start' and 'VQA at Goal' indicates that initial viewpoints are often insufficient, necessitating active exploration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The performance difference between VQA at Start and VQA at Goal is due to the sufficiency of the initial viewpoint.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Steps and Coll. denote the average number of Navigation Steps and collision rate, respectively.

    “Steps and Coll.denote the average number of Navigation Steps and collision rate respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    SR questions require understanding geometric relationships such as relative positions, distances, and size comparisons between objects.

    “SR questions require understanding geometric relationships such as relative positions, distances, and size comparisons between objects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Viewpoints not filtered out are marked green as valid initial viewpoints for E3VS.

    “Otherwise, they are marked green to indicate valid initial viewpoints for E3VS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The model can actively adjust its viewpoint to acquire geometrically informative observations, effectively integrating viewpoint selection as part of SR.

    “These results indicate that the model can actively adjust its viewpoint to acquire geometrically informative observations, effectively integrating viewpoint selection as part of SR.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Viewpoints that satisfy the same_object condition (target object class clearly visible) are retained; others are discarded.

    “We retain viewpoints that satisfy the same_object condition, which requires that the target object class is clearly visible in the image rather than ambiguous.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The preservation of sharp textures for small text by 3DGS is crucial for viewpoint-dependent visual reasoning.

    “which is crucial for viewpointdependent visual reasoning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Each example in the E3VS dataset illustrates a distinct reasoning type that requires viewpoint control in reconstructed 3D environments.

    “Each example illustrates a distinct reasoning type that requires viewpoint control in reconstructed 3D environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Once the target object is identified, it is often clear whether the current viewpoint is sufficient to determine its state, and the viewpoint required to resolve the uncertainty is relatively predictable.

    “Furthermore, once the target object is identified, it is often clear whether the current viewpoint is sufficient to determine its state, and the viewpoint required to resolve the uncertainty is relatively predictable (e.g., as shown in Fig. 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Not yet classified.

    Study design and conduct

    Because the dataset filtering removed episodes that GPT-5.1 could answer from the starting viewpoint, employing another model for answer generation would add model-specific bias and harm comparability.

    “Since episodes answerable by GPT-5.1 from the start viewpoint were removed during dataset filtering (see Section 3.2), using a different model for answer generation would introduce model-specific bias and compromise comparability.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Viewpoint labeling was performed to identify answerable viewpoints for E3VS-Bench.

    “(4) viewpoint labeling to identify answerable viewpoints”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The evaluation uses VLM judge scores on a scale of 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better performance.

    “All values except Steps and Coll.are VLM judge scores on a scale of 1 to 5 where a higher score indicates better performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The VLM-as-a-judge scoring provides a valid measure of answer correctness.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Qwen3-VL-8B has a stronger ability to recognize fine-grained object properties and make stopping decisions based on such cues.

    “implying a stronger ability to recognize fine-grained object properties and make stopping decisions based on such cues.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Annotators label candidate viewpoints associated with each question to identify which viewpoints allow the question to be answered and to remove physically invalid viewpoints.

    “After QA verification and answer correction, annotators label the candidate viewpoints associated with each question.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    OST questions typically involve binary decisions, which can often be predicted from prior knowledge or dataset bias even without sufficient visual evidence.

    “OST questions typically involve binary decisions (e.g., open vs. closed), which can often be predicted from prior knowledge or dataset bias even without sufficient visual evidence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This characteristic makes exact or near-exact matching more difficult and can naturally reduce the correlation between automated judging and human evaluation.

    “This characteristic makes exact or near-exact matching more difficult and can naturally reduce the correlation between automated judging and human evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The goal image is additionally provided to account for valid but unannotated answers.

    “The goal image is additionally provided to account for valid but unannotated answers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The evaluation covers six question types: Object Search (OS), Object State (OST), Object Attribute (OA), Context-guided Search (CGS), Spatial Reasoning (SR), and Counting (CNT).

    “Model | OS | OST | OA | CGS | SR | CNT | Avg. | Steps | Coll.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The paper evaluates various baseline models across six fine-grained question types.

    “We evaluate various baseline models across six fine-grained question types.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study conducted an ablation on the effect of the thinking process on E3VS-Bench.

    “Ablation study on the effect of the thinking process on E3VS-Bench.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The paper's dataset construction pipeline for E3VS-Bench consists of five stages.

    “The pipeline consists of five stages: (1) 3D scene curation from SceneSplat++ [20], (2) QA generation using a VLM, (3) invalid QA filtering with human verification, (4) viewpoint labeling to identify answerable viewpoints, and (5) answerability filtering to remove questions solvable without viewpoint transitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
74 of 74
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    VQA at Goal performance serves as an upper bound on performance given sufficient visual evidence.

    “which serves as an upper bound given sufficient visual evidence”
    “which represents an upper bound with sufficient visual evidence”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The performance difference between VQA at Start and VQA at Goal is due to the sufficiency of the initial viewpoint.

    “The large performance gap between 'VQA at Start' and 'VQA at Goal' indicates that initial viewpoints are often insufficient, necessitating active exploration.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The VLM-as-a-judge scoring provides a valid measure of answer correctness.

    “Your goal is to determine if the Model's RESPONSE provides a visually grounded and correct answer to the QUESTION.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The human verification of invalid QA filtering is reliable.

    “(3) invalid QA filtering with human verification”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Claimed Gemini 3.0 Pro goal-view result is absent

    Minor

    The paper compares Gemini 3.0 Pro's E3VS result with its VQA-at-Goal result in Table 3, but that table reports no VQA-at-Goal result for Gemini 3.0 Pro.

  • Viewpoint control is described as both five and six DoF

    Minor

    The task formulation defines a five-component viewpoint and calls the action space 5-DoF, while Table 1 describes E3VS-Bench as providing 6-DoF viewpoint control.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sakamoto, K., Miyanishi, T., Azuma, D., Kurita, S., Morikuni, S., Chiba, N., Kawanabe, M., Iwasawa, Y., & Matsuo, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • National Institute of Informatics (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (JP)
Corresponding author
Sakamoto, Koya
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2026
Pages
60-78
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W7155043732
Cited by
1
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
8.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25K03177)
  • Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
active perception, 3D Gaussian Splatting, free-viewpoint rendering, vision-language models, question answering, viewpoint planning, human-AI comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review