Cited by 66Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationSocial Science and Policy ResearchResearch, Science, and Academia

Learning about transdisciplinarity: Where are we? Where have we been? Where should we go?

Scholz, Roland W., Marks, David·2001·Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society

Abstract

Scholz, a social scientist and decision theorist interested in theoretical basics, and Marks, a systems engineer with experience in real-world problem solving, offer insights on the epistemology, methodology, organization, societal and professional-practice dimensions of transdisciplinarity. Transdisciplinarity represents a move from science on/about society towards science for/with society. Their detailed recommendations include more work on theory, standards of quality, and creating strong institutional frameworks. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-0348-8419-8_17

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The idea to introduce transdisciplinary research institutions was already suggested at the Zürich 2000 transdisciplinarity conference under the label 'Transdisciplinarity Colleges'.

    “The idea to introduce such institutions has already been suggested at the Zürich 2000 transdisciplinarity conference under the label “Transdisciplinarity Colleges” (Scholz and Marks 2001).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scholz, R. W., & Marks, D.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society
Published
2001
Pages
236-252
OpenAlex
W201093207
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
23.43
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Birkhäuser Basel eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
transdisciplinarity, science and society, research methodology, institutional framework, quality standards, professional practice, systems engineering, decision theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review