Cited by 102EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Neurofeedback Training for BCI Control

Neuper, Christa, Pfurtscheller, Gert·2009·The Frontiers Collection

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-02091-9_4

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extrapolation from neurofeedback to SMR BCI is not straightforward because neurofeedback typically exerts lesser demands, requiring control over predefined brain signals by direct observation, while SMR BCIs are complex pattern-recognition systems feeding back transformations of multivariate brain activity.

    “However, this extrapolation is by no means straightforward, as neurofeedback typically exerts lesser demands, requiring control over predefined brain signals by direct observation [56], while SMR BCIs are complex pattern-recognition systems feeding back transformations of multivariate brain activity [46].”
  • Subject learning in online MI BCI is most often hypothesized to occur "by default" in analogy to neurofeedback training.

    “To begin with, subject learning in online MI BCI is most often hypothesized to occur “by default” in analogy to neurofeedback training [1,46,54,55].”
  • The learning effects observed here correspond to instrumental learning, as traditionally hypothesized.

    “Several indications assert that the learning effects observed here correspond to instrumental learning, as traditionally hypothesized [46].”
  • Deriving an index of neuroimaging-based separability at the feature level to quantify the user's BCI aptitude and its evolution over time is a sine qua non prerequisite for corroborating the existence of subject learning.

    “Hence, we consider that deriving some index of neuroimaging-based separability at the feature level in order to quantify the user’s BCI aptitude (and its evolution over time) is a sine qua non prerequisite for corroborating the existence of subject learning [46].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neuper, C., & Pfurtscheller, G.
Affiliations
University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Neuper, Christa
Venue
The Frontiers Collection
Published
2009
Pages
65-78
ISSN
1612-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1891739631
Cited by
102
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.20
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The frontiers collection (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
neurofeedback, brain-computer interface, neural signal classification, EEG, electrocorticography, neural decoding, pattern recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review