The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A World of States of Affairs
Abstract
In this important study D. M. Armstrong offers a comprehensive system of analytical metaphysics that synthesises but also develops his thinking over the last twenty years. Armstrong's analysis, which acknowledges the 'logical atomism' of Russell and Wittgenstein, makes facts (or states of affairs, as the author calls them) the fundamental constituents of the world, examining properties, relations, numbers, classes, possibility and necessity, dispositions, causes and laws. All these, it is argued, find their place and can be understood inside a scheme of states of affairs. This is a comprehensive and rigorously this-worldly account of the most general features of reality, argued from a distinctive philosophical perspective, and it will appeal to a wide readership in analytical philosophy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Anscombe, G.E.M. 1971: “Causality and determination”, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Sosa 1975.
- Armstrong, D.M. 1983: What is a law of nature?, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- Armstrong, D.M. 1989: A combinatorial theory of possibility, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Armstrong, D.M. 1991: “Classes are states of affairs”, Mind 100, 189–200. · doi:10.1093/mind/c.398.189
- Bigelow, J. and Pargetter R. 1990: Science and necessity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Campbell, K., Bacon J. and Reinhardt, L. (eds.) 1993: Ontology, causality and mind: essays on the philosophy of D.M. Armstrong, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Capitan, W.H. and Merrill, D.D. (eds.): Metaphysics and explanation, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Fine, K. 1982: “First -order modal theories — facts”, Synthese 53, 43–122. · DOI
- Forrest, P. 1986: “Ways worlds could be”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64, 15–24.. · doi:10.1080/00048408612342201
- Forrest P. and Armstrong, D.M. 1987: “The nature of number”, Philosophical Papers 16, 165–86. · DOI
- Grossmann, R. 1983: The categorial structure of the world, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
- Heathcote, A. and Armstrong, D.M. 1991: “Causes and laws”, Nous 25, 63–73. · DOI
- Hochberg, H. n.d.: “Things and qualities”, in Capitan and Merrill, 82–97. · doi:10.2307/jj.11895537.14
- Lewis, D. K. 1983: “New work for a theory of universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, 343–77. · DOI · Paper page
- Lewis, D. K. 1986: “Against structural universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64, 25–46. · doi:10.1080/00048408612342211
- Lewis, D. K. (1993): “Many, but almost one”, in Campbell, Bacon and Reinhardt 1993.
- Putnam, H. 1967: “The thesis that mathematics is logic”, in Shoenman 1976. Reprinted in Putnam, H.: Philosophical papers, vol. 1, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Shoenman, R. (ed.) 1967: Bertrand Russell, philosopher of the century, London, Allen & Unwin.
- Skyrms, B. 1981: “Tractarian nominalism”, Philosophical Studies 40, 199–206. Reprinted as “Appendix” in Armstrong 1989. · doi:10.1007/bf00353791
- Sosa, E. 1975: Causation and Conditionals, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Schaffer, J. (2009) · Metametaphysics · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199546046.003.0012 · Cited by 1,382
Monism: The Priority of the Whole
Schaffer, J. (2010) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-2009-025 · Cited by 925
From an Ontological Point of View
Heil, J. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199259747.001.0001 · Cited by 888
What Not to Multiply Without Necessity
Schaffer, J. (2015) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2014.992447 · Cited by 259
Construction area (no hard hat required)
Bennett, K. (2011) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9703-8 · Cited by 252
deRosset, L. (2010) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9538-8 · Cited by 155
Making Sense of Divine Simplicity
Brower, J. E., & The Society of Christian Philosophers (2008) · Faith and Philosophy · doi:10.5840/faithphil20082511 · Cited by 137
Laws for Metaphysical Explanation
Schaffer, J. (2017) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12111 · Cited by 133
Humean laws and circular explanation
Hicks, M. T., & van Elswyk, P. (2015) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0310-3 · Cited by 79
The Divine Lawmaker: Lectures on Induction, Laws of Nature, and the Existence of God
Foster, J. (2004) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/0199250596.001.0001 · Cited by 78
Did the universe design itself?
Goff, P. (2019) · International Journal for Philosophy of Religion · doi:10.1007/s11153-018-9692-z · Cited by 62
Qualitative research meets the ghost of Pythagoras
Michell, J. (2011) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354310391351 · Cited by 56
Why Truthmaking Is Not a Case of Grounding
Audi, P. (2020) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12605 · Cited by 47
Tugby, M. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1036-x · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Armstrong, D. M.
- Venue
- Nijhoff International Philosophy Series
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 159-171
- ISSN
- 0924-4530 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050691920
- Cited by
- 1,971
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.