The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Item Response Theory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Item Response Theory (IRT), regarded as a modern test theory, models the probability of a correct response as a function of an examinee’s latent proficiency (θ) and item characteristics, independent of the specific test-taker sample—unlike Classical Test Theory, which yields sample-dependent scores24,25.”
From Leveraging computerized adaptive testing for cost-effective evaluation of large language models in medical benchmarking (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
Garrido, S. J., Cupani, M., & Arbach, K. (2017) · Psykhe (Santiago) · doi:10.7764/psykhe.26.2.980 · Cited by 9
Yaşar, M., & Aybek, E. C. (2019) · İlköğretim Online · doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2019.635031 · Cited by 9
A Comparison of Score Equating Conducted Using Haebara and Stocking Lord Method for Polytomous
Setiawan, R. (2019) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1071 · Cited by 9
Design and Key Features of the PIAAC Survey of Adults
Kirsch, I. S., Yamamoto, K., & Khorramdel, L. (2020) · Methodology of educational measurement and assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47515-4_2 · Cited by 12
PSİKOLOJİK ÖLÇMELERİN KISA TARİHİ VE 21. YÜZYILDA SINIF İÇİ DURUM BELİRLEME ANLAYIŞI
Kutlu, Ö., & Altıntaş, Ö. (2021) · Trakya Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.24315/tred.896121 · Cited by 9
Gender Issues in Psychological Testing of Personality and Abilities
Baker, N. L., & Mason, J. L. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_4 · Cited by 9
Baldwin, P. (2011) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00127.x · Cited by 9
Students Ranking, Based on their Abilities on Objective Type Test: Comparison of CTT and IRT
Zaman, A., Kashmiri, A.-U.-R., Mubarak, M. K., & Ali, A. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Paramedicine · Cited by 9
Matteucci, M., Mignani, S., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2012) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2012.725034 · Cited by 9
A Comparison of the Common‐Item and Random‐Groups Equating Designs Using Empirical Data
Kim, D., Choi, S. W., Lee, G., & Um, K. R. (2008) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00413.x · Cited by 9
Hurtz, G. M., & Jones, J. P. (2009) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957340902754601 · Cited by 9
Kim, S., & Moses, T. P. (2016) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12111 · Cited by 9
Selecting symptom instruments for cardiovascular populations
Zimmerman, L. M., Pozehl, B., Vuckovic, K. M., Barnason, S. A., Schulz, P., Seo, Y., Ryan, C. J., Zerwic, J. J., & DeVon, H. A. (2016) · Heart & Lung · doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.08.012 · Cited by 10
Rajeziesfahani, S., Federici, S., Bacci, S., Meloni, F., Bartolucci, F., Zahiroddin, A., Shams, J., & Noorbakhsh, S. (2019) · International Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/00207411.2019.1568172 · Cited by 10
Multilevel Reliability Measures of Latent Scores Within an Item Response Theory Framework
Cho, S., Shen, J., & Naveiras, M. (2019) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2019.1596780 · Cited by 9
A “Devil” Hidden in the Details
Nugent, W. R., White, L. G., & Basham, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Service Research · doi:10.1300/j079v27n01_03 · Cited by 9
A Psychometric Study of the MPSI Suicidal Thoughts Subscale
Nugent, W. R. (2006) · Stress, trauma, and crisis · doi:10.1080/15434610500506209 · Cited by 9
Borsboom, D., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_36 · Cited by 9
Kirisci, L., & Moss, H. B. (1997) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1080/07481756.1997.12068935 · Cited by 9
Model management system for IRT-based test construction decision support system
Wu, I. (2000) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(99)00047-0 · Cited by 9
Item Writing and Item Banking by Microcomputer: An Update
Roid, G. H. (1989) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1989.tb00327.x · Cited by 9
Sundström, A. E. (2011) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000063 · Cited by 9
Factors influencing testing time requirements for measurements using written simulations
Norcini, J. J., & Swanson, D. B. (1989) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401338909539387 · Cited by 9
The effects of testing in shifts on a clinical in‐course computerized exam
Kreiter, C. D., Peterson, M. W., Ferguson, K. J., & Elliott, S. (2003) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01435.x · Cited by 9
Optimum Design in Item Response Theory: Test Assembly and Item Calibration
van der Linden, W. J. (1994) · Recent research in psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4308-3_22 · Cited by 9
Differentiation of Self Inventory - short form: creation and Initial evidence of construct validity
Drake, J. R. (2011) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 9
How to Select an Instrument for Assessing Student Learning
Covacevich, C. (2014) · doi:10.18235/0010603 · Cited by 9
Item response theory modeling with nonignorable missing data
Pimentel, J. L. (2005) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 9
A Framework for Democratizing AIPreprint
Ahmed, S., Mula, R., & Dhavala, S. S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.00818 · Cited by 9
Psychometric properties of the mandarin clinical evaluation of language for preschooler’s core scale
Wu, H., Liu, Q., Yu, B., Zhang, Y., Ren, D., Serdarevic, M., Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Chen, S., Zhang, K., et al. (2020) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106000 · Cited by 8
Methods for Measuring Speededness: Chronology, Classification, and Ensuing Research and Development
Cintron, D. W. (2021) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12337 · Cited by 8
Huang, J., Shu, T., Dong, Y., & Zhu, D. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100716 · Cited by 8
Shaping Supreme Court Policy Through Appointments: The Impact of a New Justice
Cameron, C. M., Park, J., & Beim, D. (2009) · Minnesota law review · doi:10.24926/265535.1461 · Cited by 8
IDENTIFIKASI KESULITAN PESERTA DIDIK DALAM BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DAN SAINS DI SEKOLAH DASAR
Retnawati, H., Kartowagiran, B., Hadi, S., & Hidayati, K. (2011) · Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran · doi:10.21831/jk.v41i2.1930 · Cited by 8
Item Response Theory analysis of the Autonomy over Tobacco Scale (AUTOS)
Wellman, R. J., Edelen, M. O., & DiFranza, J. R. (2015) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.036 · Cited by 8
On the Usefulness of a Multilevel Logistic Regression Approach to Person-Fit Analysis
Conijn, J. M., Emons, W. H. M., van Assen, M. A. L. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2011) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.546733 · Cited by 8
Classification accuracy and consistency of computerized adaptive testing
Cheng, Y., & Morgan, D. L. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0237-6 · Cited by 8
Evaluating the Mathematics Interest Inventory Using Item Response Theory
Wei, T., Chesnut, S. R., Barnard-Brak, L. M., Stevens, T., & Olivárez, A. (2014) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282914540449 · Cited by 8
Statistical reform in school psychology research: A synthesis
Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (2007) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20246 · Cited by 8
Self-citationCognitive and non-cognitive skills affect employment outcomes: evidence from Central Asia
Nikoloski, Z., & Ajwad, M. I. (2014) · Cited by 8
Quantitative literacy of school leavers aspiring to higher education in South Africa
Frith, V., & Prince, R. N. (2016) · South African Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.20853/30-1-552 · Cited by 8
From Diagnostics to Learning Success
Beck, K., & Zlatkin‐Troitschanskaia, O. (2013) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-191-7 · Cited by 8
The Perception of Change Strategy Scale: Validating the Measure
Szabla, D. B., Dardick, W. R., & Devlin, J. A. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0897-301620160000024004 · Cited by 8
Martsolf, G. R., Carle, A. C., & Scanlon, D. P. (2016) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12533 · Cited by 8
Krabbe, P. F. M. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801504-9.00010-6 · Cited by 8
Shergadwala, M., Kannan, K., & Panchal, J. H. (2016) · ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE) · doi:10.1115/detc2016-59038 · Cited by 8
The sirens’ call in psychometrics: The invariance of IRT models
Asún, R. A., Rdz-Navarro, K., & Alvarado, J. M. (2017) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354317706272 · Cited by 8
How presentation affects the difficulty of computational thinking tasks
Lonati, V., Monga, M., Malchiodi, D., & Morpurgo, A. (2017) · Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3141880.3141900 · Cited by 8
Use of Item Response Theory to Validate Cyberbullying Sensibility Scale for University Students
Arıcak, O. T., Avcu, A., Topçu, F., & Tutlu, M. G. (2020) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.629584 · Cited by 8
Learning from Non-Assessed Resources: Deep Multi-Type Knowledge Tracing
Wang, C., Zhao, S., & Sahebi, S. (2021) · Educational Data Mining · Cited by 8
Modeling Within- and Between-Person Differences in the Use of the Middle Category in Likert Scales
Tijmstra, J., & Bolsinova, M. A. (2025) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466216251322285 · Cited by 8
Psychometric evaluation of the Basic Traits Inventory in the multilingual South African environment
Grobler, S., & Beer, M. D. (2015) · Journal of Psychology in Africa · doi:10.1080/14330237.2014.997033 · Cited by 8
Rasch analysis of a Spanish language-screening parent survey
Guiberson, M., & Rodríguez, B. L. (2014) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.12.011 · Cited by 8
Abbas, M., Schwartz, M. E., Smith, F. J. D., McLean, W. H. I., & Hull, P. R. (2015) · Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.2310/7750.2014.14017 · Cited by 8
Detecting Multidimensionality Due to Curricular Differences
DeMars, C. E. (2003) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01095.x · Cited by 8
ASSESSING FIT OF MODELS WITH DISCRETE PROFICIENCY VARIABLES IN EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT
Sinharay, S., Almond, R. G., & Yan, D. (2004) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2004.tb01934.x · Cited by 8
Fitting Rasch Model using Appropriateness Measure Statistics
Pina, J. A. L., & Montesinos, M. D. H. (2005) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/s113874160000500x · Cited by 8
Huggins‐Manley, A. C., & Han, H. (2016) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1247355 · Cited by 8
Brown, G. G., Thomas, M. L., & Patt, V. M. (2017) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1334829 · Cited by 8
Data Fit Comparison of Mixture Item Response Theory Models and Traditional Models
Yalçın, S. (2018) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.402806 · Cited by 8
The Precision of Students’ Ability Estimation on Combinations of Item Response Theory Models
Falani, I., Akbar, M., & Naga, D. S. (2020) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2020.13434a · Cited by 8
Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., Cudo, A., & Elphinston, R. A. (2024) · European Review of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.erap.2023.100939 · Cited by 8
Chen, C., Chung, C.-J., & Chen, M.-C. (2006) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2006.384727 · Cited by 8
Student ability assessment based on two IRT models
Cagnone, S., & Ricci, R. (2005) · Advances in Methodology and Statistics · doi:10.51936/mgel1817 · Cited by 8
Shannon, G. A., & Cliver, B. A. (1987) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00285.x · Cited by 8
Empirical Examination of a Learning Hierarchy Using an Item Response Theory Model
Wilson, M. R. (1989) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.1989.10806516 · Cited by 8
Constructing a Computerized Adaptive Test for University Applicants With Disabilities
Moshinsky, A., & Kazin, C. (2005) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1804_3 · Cited by 8
Chapter 2: Planning the Initial Verson
Bonder, B. R. (1989) · Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics · doi:10.1080/j006v09n01_02 · Cited by 8
Person dimensionality in language test validation
Lynch, B. K., Davidson, F., & Henning, G. H. (1988) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553228800500206 · Cited by 8
Durchführung und methodische Grundlagen der TOSCA-Studie
Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., Bundt, S., Gomolka, J., & Watermann, R. (2004) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-80906-3_6 · Cited by 8
Muñiz, J. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa094 · Cited by 8
Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0317-7_6 · Cited by 7
Sample Size Requirements for Parameter Recovery in the 4-Parameter Logistic Model
Cuhadar, I. (2022) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2021.1934805 · Cited by 7
Díaz, N. V. M., Yoon, S. Y., Trytten, D., & Meier, R. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3335931 · Cited by 7
Chen, H.-F. (2009) · Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) · Cited by 7
Detecting Person Misfit in Adaptive Testing
Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8_16 · Cited by 7
Köse, İ. A. (2015) · Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17240/aibuefd.2015.15.2-5000161319 · Cited by 7
Assessment of diagnostics tools for sarcopenia severity using the item response theory (IRT)
Šteffl, M., Musálek, M., Kramperová, V., Petr, M., Kohlíková, E., Holmerová, I., & Volicer, L. (2016) · The journal of nutrition health & aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-016-0713-2 · Cited by 7
Bayesian Estimation of a Multidimensional Additive Graded Response Model for Correlated Traits
Martelli, I., Matteucci, M., & Mignani, S. (2014) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610918.2014.932804 · Cited by 7
The Choice of Response Probability in Bookmark Standard Setting: An Experimental Study
Baldwin, P., Margolis, M. J., Clauser, B. E., Mee, J., & Winward, M. L. (2019) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/emip.12230 · Cited by 7
Himelfarb, I., Shotts, B. L., Tang, N.-E., & Smith, M. (2019) · Journal of Chiropractic Education · doi:10.7899/jce-18-27 · Cited by 7
Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Gäde, J. C., & Kelava, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-61532-4_12 · Cited by 7
Kartal, S. K., & Dirlik, E. M. (2021) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.728362 · Cited by 7
Adaptive Fuzzy Neural Agent for Human and Machine Co-learning
Lee, C.-S., Tsai, Y.-L., Wang, M., Huang, S. C., Reformat, M., & Kubota, N. (2021) · International Journal of Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1007/s40815-021-01188-6 · Cited by 8
Laçin, E., & Güldenoğlu, B. (2022) · Pamukkale University Journal of Education · doi:10.9779/pauefd.975676 · Cited by 10
Altakhaineh, A. R. M., & Melo‐Pfeifer, S. (2022) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2021-0183 · Cited by 7
The Comparison of Estimation Methods for the Four-Parameter Logistic Item Response Theory Model
Kalkan, Ö. K. (2022) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2021.1897398 · Cited by 7
Examining the Achievement Test Development Process in the Educational Studies
Şahin, M. G., Yıldırım, Y., & Öztürk, N. B. (2023) · Participatory Educational Research · doi:10.17275/per.23.14.10.1 · Cited by 7
Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2007) · Educational and Child Psychology · doi:10.53841/bpsecp.2007.24.4.44 · Cited by 7
Retnawati, H. (2013) · Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan · doi:10.21831/pep.v17i2.1700 · Cited by 7
Categorical Latent Variable Modeling Using Mplus: Cross-Sectional Data
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2009) · Cited by 7
Developing Information Skills Test for Malaysian Youth Students Using Rasch Analysis
Karim, A. B. A., Shah, P. M., Din, R., Ahmad, M., & Lubis, M. A. (2014) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v7n13p112 · Cited by 7
Employing the Rasch Model to Detect Biased Items
Hungi, N. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3076-2_8 · Cited by 7
Post-hoc IRT equating of previously administered English tests for comparison of test scores
Saida, C., & Hattori, T. (2008) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/0265532207086781 · Cited by 7
Relationships of Measurement Error and Prediction Error in Observed‐Score Regression
Moses, T. P. (2012) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00182.x · Cited by 6
ALFABETIZAÇÃO FINANCEIRA: UM ESTUDO POR MEIO DA APLICAÇÃO DA TEORIA DE RESPOSTA AO ITEM
do Nascimento, J. C. H. B., Macedo, M. Á. D. S., de Siqueira, J. R. M., & Bernardes, J. R. (2016) · Administração Ensino e Pesquisa · doi:10.13058/raep.2016.v17n1.341 · Cited by 7
Moral identity test (MIT) for children: reliability and validity
Coşkun, K., & Kara, C. (2019) · Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica · doi:10.1186/s41155-019-0120-9 · Cited by 7
Gnaldi, M., & Bacci, S. (2015) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-015-0214-0 · Cited by 7
Zheng, T., Jiang, Z., Liu, J., & Feng, S. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02671-w · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1985
- OpenAlex
- W2505213109
- Cited by
- 1,777
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- item response theory, psychometrics, measurement theory, test theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review