The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Item Response Theory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Item Response Theory (IRT), regarded as a modern test theory, models the probability of a correct response as a function of an examinee’s latent proficiency (θ) and item characteristics, independent of the specific test-taker sample—unlike Classical Test Theory, which yields sample-dependent scores24,25.”
From Leveraging computerized adaptive testing for cost-effective evaluation of large language models in medical benchmarking (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,001
An Examination of the Equivalence between Non-Adaptive Computer-Based and Traditional Testing
Mason, B. J., Patry, M. W., & Bernstein, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/9epm-b14r-xqwt-wvnl · Cited by 84
de Jong, M. G., Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2009) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1080.0439 · Cited by 83
Differentiation of Self Inventory—Short Form: Development and Preliminary Validation
Drake, J. R., Murdock, N. L., Marszalek, J. M., & Barber, C. E. (2015) · Contemporary Family Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10591-015-9329-7 · Cited by 83
The ABC’s of Suicide Risk Assessment: Applying a Tripartite Approach to Individual Evaluations
Harris, K. M., Syu, J.-J., Lello, O. D., Chew, Y. L. E., Willcox, C. H., & Ho, R. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127442 · Cited by 93
Modeling the time-course of Alzheimer dementia
Ashford, J. W., & Schmitt, F. A. (2001) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-001-0067-1 · Cited by 90
Seong, T.-J. (1990) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169001400307 · Cited by 83
The Power of Rasch Person-Fit Statistics in Detecting Unusual Response Patterns
Li, M. F., & Olejnik, S. F. (1997) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466216970213002 · Cited by 82
Methodological and Substantive Issues in Conducting Multinational and Cross-Cultural Research
Spector, P. E., Liu, C., & Sanchez, J. I. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111310 · Cited by 82
Using nationally representative percentiles to interpret PROMIS pediatric measures
Carle, A. C., Bevans, K. B., Tucker, C. A., & Forrest, C. B. (2020) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-020-02700-5 · Cited by 85
The Null Distribution of Person-Fit Statistics for Conventional and Adaptive Tests
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R. (1999) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466219922031446 · Cited by 81
Reconsidering Reliability in Classroom Assessment and Grading
Smith, J. K. (2003) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00141.x · Cited by 81
Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
Meijer, R. R. (2003) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.8.1.72 · Cited by 81
Web‐based Assessment and Test Analyses (WATA) system: development and evaluation
Wang, T., Wang, K. H., Wang, W. L., Huang, S. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2004) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00066.x · Cited by 80
Bien Educado: Measuring the social behaviors of Mexican American children
Bridges, M., Cohen, S. R., McGuire, L. W., Yamada, H., Fuller, B. C., Mireles, L., & Scott, L. (2012) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.01.005 · Cited by 80
An NCME Instructional Module on Multistage Testing
Hendrickson, A. (2007) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00093.x · Cited by 80
Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models
Sinharay, S. (2006) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711005x66888 · Cited by 80
Multistage Adaptive Testing Design in International Large‐Scale Assessments
Yamamoto, K., Shin, H. J., & Khorramdel, L. (2018) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/emip.12226 · Cited by 84
Deslatte, A., & Stokan, E. (2020) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13237 · Cited by 79
Experiences With Markov Chain Monte Carlo Convergence Assessment in Two Psychometric Examples
Sinharay, S. (2004) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986029004461 · Cited by 78
Specifying and Refining a Measurement Model for a Computer-Based Interactive Assessment
Levy, R., & Mislevy, R. J. (2004) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0404_3 · Cited by 77
Ai, X. (2002) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0401_1 · Cited by 77
Comparing the Fit of Item Response Theory and Factor Analysis Models
Maydeu‐Olivares, A., Cai, L., & Hernández, A. (2011) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.581993 · Cited by 77
A Comparison of Linking and Concurrent Calibration Under the Graded Response Model
Kim, S., & Cohen, A. S. (2002) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621602026001002 · Cited by 77
Standardized Conditional SEM : A Case for Conditional Reliability
Raju, N. S., Price, L. R., Oshima, T. C., & Nering, M. L. (2007) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621606291569 · Cited by 77
The Link Between Nutrition and Physical Activity in Increasing Academic Achievement
Asigbee, F. M., Whitney, S. D., & Peterson, C. E. (2018) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/josh.12625 · Cited by 100
Bartram, D. J., Sinclair, J. M., & Baldwin, D. S. (2013) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0144-4 · Cited by 76
Graded response modeling of the Quality of Life Interview
Uttaro, T., & Lehman, A. F. (1999) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(98)00039-1 · Cited by 78
A Comparison of Procedures for Content-Sensitive Item Selection in Computerized Adaptive Tests
Kingsbury, C., & Zara, A. R. (1991) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0403_4 · Cited by 76
Rupp, A. (2013) · Psychological test and assessment modeling · Cited by 75
Gender and Crime Victimization Modify Neighborhood Effects on Adolescent Mental Health
Osypuk, T. L., Schmidt, N. M., Bates, L. M., Tchetgen-Tchetgen, E. J., Earls, F. J., & Glymour, M. M. (2012) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2535 · Cited by 75
Screening for Memory Disorders, Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease
Ashford, J. W. (2008) · Aging Health · doi:10.2217/1745509x.4.4.399 · Cited by 76
Capturing Abnormal Personality With Normal Personality Inventories: An Item Response Theory Approach
Walton, K. E., Roberts, B. W., Krueger, R. F., Blonigen, D. M., & Hicks, B. M. (2008) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00533.x · Cited by 73
Farias, S. T., Mungas, D., REED, B., Haan, M. N., & Jagust, W. J. (2004) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617704103020 · Cited by 73
Understanding the Knowledge Gap: The Role of Experts and Journalists
Jerit, J. (2009) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381609090380 · Cited by 73
An Analysis of the Connectedness to Nature Scale Based on Item Response Theory
Pasca, L., Aragonés, J. I., & Coello, M. T. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01330 · Cited by 72
Cognitive Diagnostic Attribute-Level Discrimination Indices
Henson, R. A., Roussos, L. A., Douglas, J., & He, X. (2008) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621607302478 · Cited by 72
Hahn, E. A., Choi, S. W., Griffith, J. W., Yost, K. J., & Baker, D. W. (2011) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.605434 · Cited by 72
Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. A. (2005) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.28 · Cited by 72
The Numeracy Understanding in Medicine Instrument
Schapira, M. M., Walker, C. M., Cappaert, K. J., Ganschow, P. S., Fletcher, K. E., McGinley, E. L., Pozo, S. D., Schauer, C., Tarima, S. S., & Jacobs, E. A. (2012) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x12447239 · Cited by 72
Using plausible values in secondary analysis in large-scale assessments
Laukaityte, I., & Wiberg, M. (2016) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610926.2016.1267764 · Cited by 80
The measurement properties of a French language adaptation of the National Adult Reading Test
Mackinnon, A. J., Ritchie, K. A., & Mulligan, R. (1999) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.54 · Cited by 71
Crane, P. K., Narasimhalu, K., Gibbons, L. E., Pedraza, O., Mehta, K. M., Tang, Y., Manly, J. J., Reed, B., & Mungas, D. (2008) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617708081162 · Cited by 72
PISA: What makes the difference?
Ammermueller, A. (2006) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-006-0102-5 · Cited by 71
Do Concept Inventories Actually Measure Anything?
Wallace, C. S., & Bailey, J. M. (2010) · Astronomy Education Review · doi:10.3847/aer2010024 · Cited by 70
Equating and Linking of Performance Assessments
Muraki, E., Hombo, C. M., & Lee, Y. W. (2000) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466210022031787 · Cited by 70
A Rasch Hierarchical Measurement Model
Maier, K. S. (2001) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986026003307 · Cited by 70
Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision
Janssen, G., Meier, V., & Trace, J. (2015) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.002 · Cited by 69
Schrum, C. L., & Salekin, R. T. (2006) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.679 · Cited by 69
Measurement Efficiency of Innovative Item Formats in Computer‐Based Testing
Jodoin, M. G. (2003) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01093.x · Cited by 69
Areepattamannil, S., & Khine, M. S. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.058 · Cited by 70
Adaptive Designs for Likert-Type Data: An Approach for Implementing Marketing Surveys
Singh, J., Howell, R. D., & Rhoads, G. K. (1990) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379002700305 · Cited by 68
Improving IRT Item Bias Detection With Iterative Linking and Ability Scale Purification
Park, D.-G., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1990) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169001400205 · Cited by 68
The Distribution of Person Fit Using True and Estimated Person Parameters
Nering, M. L. (1995) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169501900201 · Cited by 67
A Comparison of Item Selection Rules at the Early Stages of Computerized Adaptive Testing
Chen, S.-Y., Ankenmann, R. D., & Chang, H. (2000) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466210022031705 · Cited by 67
Unrestricted item factor analysis and some relations with Item Response Theory
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo‐Seva, U. (2013) · Cited by 67
Fienberg, S. E., & Junker, B. W. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.01311-7 · Cited by 67
Evaluating item response theory linking and model fit for data from PISA 2000–2012
von Davier, M., Yamamoto, K., Shin, H. J., Chen, H., Khorramdel, L., Weeks, J., Davis, S., Kong, N., & Kandathil, M. (2019) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1586642 · Cited by 66
An Item Response Theory Evaluation of an English Version of the Trier Personality Inventory (TPI)
Ellis, B. B., Becker, P., & Kimmel, H. D. (1993) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022193242001 · Cited by 66
Computerized adaptive measurement of depression: A simulation study
Gardner, W., Shear, K., Kelleher, K. J., Pajer, K. A., Mammen, O., Buysse, D., & Frank, E. (2004) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-4-13 · Cited by 65
Evaluating Comparability in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Issues, Criteria and an Example
Wang, T., & Kolen, M. J. (2001) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01115.x · Cited by 65
An Introduction to Using Multidimensional Item Response Theory to Assess Latent Factor Structures
Osteen, P. J. (2010) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.5243/jsswr.2010.6 · Cited by 64
van den Oord, E. J. C. G., Pickles, A. R., & Waldman, I. D. (2003) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00112 · Cited by 65
Miller, M. D., & Oshima, T. C. (1992) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169201600410 · Cited by 65
Weiss, D. J., & Yoes, M. E. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2195-5_3 · Cited by 65
CUSUM-Based Person-Fit Statistics for Adaptive Testing
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R. (2001) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986026002199 · Cited by 65
Item Selection in Computerized Classification Testing
Thompson, N. A. (2008) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164408324460 · Cited by 64
Influence of Test and Person Characteristics on Nonparametric Appropriateness Measurement
Meijer, R. R., Molenaar, I. W., & Sijtsma, K. (1994) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169401800202 · Cited by 64
Capitalization on Item Calibration Error in Adaptive Testing
van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W. (2000) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1301_2 · Cited by 63
THE FUSION MODEL FOR SKILLS DIAGNOSIS: BLENDING THEORY WITH PRACTICALITY
Hartz, S. M., & Roussos, L. A. (2008) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02157.x · Cited by 63
How Do Respondents Construe Ambiguous Response Formats of Affect Items?
Lloret, S., & González‐Romá, V. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.956 · Cited by 63
Dimensionality and construct validity of language tests
Henning, G. H. (1992) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553229200900102 · Cited by 63
Rouse, S. V., Finger, M. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1999) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jp720212 · Cited by 63
Mackinnon, A. J., Christensen, H. M., Jorm, A. F., Henderson, A. S., Scott, R., & Korten, A. E. (1994) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700029068 · Cited by 63
Luecht, R. M. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa125 · Cited by 63
Lee, Y. (2004) · Language Testing · doi:10.1191/0265532204lt260oa · Cited by 62
Jeong, J., Obradović, J., Rasheed, M. A., McCoy, D. C., Fink, G., & Yousafzai, A. K. (2018) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2018.12.001 · Cited by 65
Donoghue, J. R. (1994) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00448.x · Cited by 62
Assessing Dimensionality of a Set of Item Responses‐Comparison of Different Approaches
Nandakumar, R. (1994) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00432.x · Cited by 62
A Cautionary Note on Using G2(dif) to Assess Relative Model Fit in Categorical Data Analysis
Maydeu‐Olivares, A., & Cai, L. (2006) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_4 · Cited by 61
Bartolucci, F., Lupparelli, M., & Montanari, G. E. (2009) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/08-aoas230 · Cited by 61
A New Proof for Monotone Likelihood Ratio for the Sum of Independent Bernoulli Random Variables
Huynh, H. (1994) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294266 · Cited by 61
Bartolucci, F. (2006) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00538.x · Cited by 61
Swanson, D. B., Clauser, B. E., & Case, S. M. (1999) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1023/a:1009862220473 · Cited by 61
Health Literacy 2030: Is It Time to Redefine the Term?
Ancker, J. S., Liu, L. G., & Benda, N. C. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05472-y · Cited by 61
A Comparison of the Person Response Function and the lz Person-Fit Statistic
Nering, M. L., & Meijer, R. R. (1998) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466216980221004 · Cited by 60
Longitudinal Rasch Modeling in the Context of Psychotherapy Outcomes Assessment
Pastor, D. A., & Beretvas, S. N. (2006) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621605279761 · Cited by 60
Influence of Item Parameter Estimation Errors in Test Development
Hambleton, R. K., Jones, R., & Rogers, H. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb01071.x · Cited by 60
Self-citationUsing Multilevel Logistic Regression to Evaluate Person-Fit in IRT Models
Reise, S. P. (2000) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3504_06 · Cited by 60
Many-Faceted Rasch Calibration of a Gross Motor Instrument
Zhu, W., & Cole, E. L. (1996) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1996.10607922 · Cited by 59
Pedraza, O., Graff‐Radford, N. R., Smith, G. E., Ivnik, R. J., Willis, F. B., Petersen, R. C., & Lucas, J. A. (2009) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617709990361 · Cited by 60
Catquest questionnaire: re‐validation in an Australian cataract population
Gothwal, V. K., Wright, T. A., Lamoureux, E. L., Lundström, M., & Pesudovs, K. (2009) · Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02133.x · Cited by 59
Kullback–Leibler Information and Its Applications in Multi-Dimensional Adaptive Testing
Wang, C., Chang, H., & Boughton, K. A. (2010) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-010-9186-0 · Cited by 59
Penk, C., Pöhlmann, C., & Roppelt, A. (2014) · Large-scale Assessments in Education · doi:10.1186/s40536-014-0005-4 · Cited by 59
The Person Response Function as a Tool in Person-Fit Research
Sijtsma, K., & Meijer, R. R. (2001) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294835 · Cited by 59
Criteria for Selection and Evaluation of Scales and Measures
Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H., & Matthews, G. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386915-9.00001-2 · Cited by 58
Test Validity in Cognitive Assessment
Borsboom, D., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611186.004 · Cited by 61
Wei, T., Chesnut, S. R., Barnard-Brak, L. M., & Richman, D. M. (2014) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-014-9468-4 · Cited by 58
Carmody, K. A., Yang, C., & Runyan, D. K. (2010) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s095457941000009x · Cited by 58
Jafari, P., Bagheri, Z., Ayatollahi, S. M. T., & Soltani, Z. E. (2012) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-27 · Cited by 65
Optimal Testing With Easy or Difficult Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing
Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Verschoor, A. J. (2006) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621606288890 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1985
- OpenAlex
- W2505213109
- Cited by
- 1,777
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- item response theory, psychometrics, measurement theory, test theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review