The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Item Response Theory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Item Response Theory (IRT), regarded as a modern test theory, models the probability of a correct response as a function of an examinee’s latent proficiency (θ) and item characteristics, independent of the specific test-taker sample—unlike Classical Test Theory, which yields sample-dependent scores24,25.”
From Leveraging computerized adaptive testing for cost-effective evaluation of large language models in medical benchmarking (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,001
Sadhu, S., Ad’hiya, E., & Laksono, E. W. (2019) · Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · doi:10.15294/jpii.v8i4.20967 · Cited by 12
Testing Latent Variable Distribution Fit in IRT Using Posterior Residuals
Monroe, S. (2020) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/1076998620953764 · Cited by 12
Martínez, J. M. O., & López, Á. B. (2021) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21681 · Cited by 16
Functional Thought Experiments
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2002) · Synthese · doi:10.1023/a:1014840616403 · Cited by 12
A Dynamic Questionnaire to Further Reduce Questions in Learning Style Assessment
Mwamikazi, E., Fournier‐Viger, P., Moghrabi, C., & Baudouin, R. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44654-6_22 · Cited by 12
Cohen, J., Chan, T., Jiang, T., & Seburn, M. (2008) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621607300047 · Cited by 12
Ranking Scientific Journals Via Latent Class Models for Polytomous Item Response Data
Bartolucci, F., Dardanoni, V., & Peracchi, F. (2015) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/rssa.12106 · Cited by 12
Implications of Item Response Theory for the Measurement Practitioner
Loyd, B. H. (1988) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0102_2 · Cited by 12
Estimating Average Domain Scores
Pommerich, M., Nicewander, W. A., & Hanson, B. A. (1999) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1999.tb00554.x · Cited by 12
Overton, R. C., HARMS, H. J., TAYLOR, L. R., & Zickar, M. J. (1997) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00907.x · Cited by 12
Luo, Y., & Dimitrov, D. M. (2018) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164418777569 · Cited by 12
Li, Y. H., Tam, H. P., & Tompkins, L. J. (2004) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0403_5 · Cited by 12
IRT Ability Estimates from Customized Achievement Tests Without Representative Content Sampling
Way, W. D., Forsyth, R. A., & Ansley, T. N. (1989) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0201_2 · Cited by 12
Application of an Irt Polytomous Model for Measuring Health Related Quality of Life
Tejada, A. J. R., & Lozano, O. M. (2005) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-004-3232-1 · Cited by 12
Factors Which Influence Precision of School‐Level IRT Ability Estimates
Tate, R. L., & King, F. (1994) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00431.x · Cited by 12
Diagnosing the personality organization of drug abusers by rating ego balance
Sandell, R. (1994) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01542.x · Cited by 12
Putting Item Response Theory into Perspective
Wood, T. M. (1987) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1987.10605452 · Cited by 12
Systematizing the Item Content in Test Design
van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1988) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5644-9_14 · Cited by 12
The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory by de Ayala, R. J.
Ackerman, T. A. (2010) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00124.x · Cited by 12
Kyriakides, L. E., Ioannou, I., Charalambous, E., & Michaelidou, V. (2024) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2024.2385921 · Cited by 12
Discrepancy measures for item fit analysis in item response theory
Toribio, S. G., & Albert, J. H. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation · doi:10.1080/00949655.2010.485131 · Cited by 11
A model for psychiatric questionnaires with embarrassing items
Cúri, M., Singer, J. M., & de Andrade, D. F. (2010) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280210369424 · Cited by 11
Chen, C., Xie, H., Filgueiras, A., Squires, J., Anunciação, L., & Landeira-Fernández, J. (2017) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-017-0770-0 · Cited by 11
Evaluating the quality of the ontology-based auto-generated questions
Demaidi, M. N., Gaber, M. M., & Filer, N. P. (2017) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-017-0046-6 · Cited by 11
A Clinical Support System Based on Quality of Life Estimation
Faria, B. M., Gonçalves, J. J., Reis, L. P., & Rocha, Á. (2015) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-015-0308-1 · Cited by 11
An investigation of the measurement properties of the Spot-the-Word test in a community sample.
Mackinnon, A., & Christensen, H. (2007) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.459 · Cited by 11
Analysis of the professional choice self-efficacy scale using the Rasch-Andrich rating scale model
Ambiel, R. A. M., Noronha, A. P. P., & Carvalho, L. D. F. (2015) · International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance · doi:10.1007/s10775-015-9293-7 · Cited by 11
Designing an Interactive Learning Environment to Support Children's Understanding in Complex Domains
Milrad, M. (1999) · EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology · Cited by 11
LC-PROM: Validation of a patient reported outcomes measure for liver cirrhosis patients
Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Lv, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0482-y · Cited by 11
Evaluation of Student Performance through a Multidimensional Finite Mixture IRT Model
Bacci, S., Bartolucci, F., Grilli, L., & Rampichini, C. (2017) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2017.1361803 · Cited by 11
The Effect of Rating Unfamiliar Items on Angoff Passing Scores
Clauser, J. C., Hambleton, R. K., & Baldwin, P. (2016) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164416670983 · Cited by 11
Self-citationThe Development of Practical Item Analysis Program for Indonesian Teachers
Muhson, A., Lestari, B., Supriyanto, S., & Baroroh, K. (2017) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.12973/iji.2017.10213a · Cited by 13
An Experimental Study of the Internal Consistency of Judgments Made in Bookmark Standard Setting
Clauser, B. E., Baldwin, P., Margolis, M. J., Mee, J., & Winward, M. L. (2017) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/jedm.12157 · Cited by 11
Latent variables should remain as such: Evidence from a Monte Carlo study
Rdz-Navarro, K. (2019) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2019.1596064 · Cited by 11
Clinical Interpretation of the Neck Functional Status Computerized Adaptive Test
Deutscher, D., Cook, K. F., Kallen, M. A., Werneke, M. W., Hayes, D., Mioduski, J. E., Fritz, J. M., Woodhouse, L. J., & Stratford, P. W. (2019) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8862 · Cited by 11
Wesson, P., Lippman, S. A., Neilands, T. B., Twine, R., Ahern, J., Gómez-Olivé, F. X., Peacock, D., MacPhail, C. L., Kahn, K., & Pettifor, A. E. (2019) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.07.010 · Cited by 11
Bagaimana hasil penyetaraan paket tes USBN pada mata pelajaran matematika dengan teori respon butir?
Yusron, E., Retnawati, H., & Rafi, I. (2020) · Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika · doi:10.21831/jrpm.v7i1.31221 · Cited by 11
Goldstein, B. L., Briggs‐Gowan, M. J., Greene, C., Chang, R., & Grasso, D. J. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23167 · Cited by 10
Measuring Human Intelligence with Artificial Intelligence: Adaptive Item Generation
Embretson, S. E. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511607073.014 · Cited by 11
Local Dependence in an Operational CAT: Diagnosis and Implications
Pommerich, M., & Segall, D. O. (2008) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00061.x · Cited by 11
On Holland's Dutch Identity Conjecture
Zhang, J., & Stout, W. (1997) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294557 · Cited by 11
The validity of “conceptual span” as a measure of working memory capacity
Kane, M. J., & Miyake, T. M. (2007) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193484 · Cited by 10
Psychometric Approaches Help Resolve Competing Cognitive Models: When Less Is More Than It Seems
Arendasy, M. E., Sommer, M., & Ponocny, I. (2005) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2304_3 · Cited by 11
Item response theory for longitudinal data: Item and population ability parameters estimation
Tavares, H. R., & de Andrade, D. F. (2006) · Test · doi:10.1007/bf02595420 · Cited by 11
Differential Item Performance in Mathematics Achievement Test Items: Effect of Item Arrangement
Plake, B. S., Patience, W. M., & Whitney, D. R. (1988) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164488484003 · Cited by 11
Rasch-Master’s Partial Credit Model in the Assessment of Children’s Creativity in Drawings
Nakano, T. D. C., & Primi, R. (2014) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2014.36 · Cited by 11
Equating Minimum‐Competency Tests: Comparisons of Methods
Hills, J. R., Subhiyah, R. G., & Hirsch, T. M. (1988) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00304.x · Cited by 11
CONCURRENT CALIBRATION OF DICHOTOMOUSLY AND POLYTOMOUSLY SCORED TOEFL ITEMS USING IRT MODELS
Tang, K. L., & Eignor, D. R. (1997) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1997.tb01727.x · Cited by 11
Foley, B. P. (2010) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 11
Hudson, T. D. (1991) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553229100800205 · Cited by 11
An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Conners Teacher's Rating Scale
Gumpel, T. P., Wilson, M. R., & Shalev, R. S. (1998) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949803100602 · Cited by 11
Development of HOTS Oriented Cognitive Problems in Thermodynamics for Senior High Schools
Agustihana, S., & Suparno, S. (2019) · Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA) · doi:10.26740/jpfa.v9n1.p44-54 · Cited by 11
Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the Nearest-Neighbors Criterion
Cheng, P. E., & Liou, M. (2003) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621603027003002 · Cited by 11
Wilson, M. R. (1992) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.2307/1164497 · Cited by 11
Evaluation of Computer Simulated Baseline Statistics for Use in Item Bias Studies
Rogers, H. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1989) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164489492008 · Cited by 11
Self-citationUse of Restricted Item Response Models for Examining Item Difficulty Ordering and Slope Uniformity
Lane, S. (1991) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00360.x · Cited by 11
Topkaya, Y., Doğan, Y., Batdı, V., & Aydın, S. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17073015 · Cited by 18
Learner models: design, components, structure, and modelling
Böck, F., Ochs, M., Henrich, A., Landes, D., Leidner, J. L., & Sedelmaier, Y. (2025) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-025-09434-4 · Cited by 18
Li, C., Gheorghe, D. A., Gallacher, J., & Bauermeister, S. (2020) · Evidence-Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/ebmental-2020-300147 · Cited by 10
Niederbacher, E., & Neuenschwander, M. P. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-020-00955-9 · Cited by 10
A Time-Varying Dynamic Partial Credit Model to Analyze Polytomous and Multivariate Time Series Data
Castro‐Alvarez, S., Bringmann, L. F., Meijer, R. R., & Tendeiro, J. N. (2023) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2023.2214787 · Cited by 10
Estimating Difficulty from Polytomous Categorical Data
Revuelta, J. (2010) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9145-9 · Cited by 10
Evaluating the MBTI® Form M in a South African context
van Zyl, C. J. J., & Taylor, N. (2012) · SA Journal of Industrial Psychology · doi:10.4102/sajip.v38i1.977 · Cited by 10
Ninth Grade Student’ Self-assessment in Science: A Rasch Analysis Approach
Chiang, W.-W. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.462 · Cited by 10
Sussman, J., Beaujean, A. A., Worrell, F. C., & Watson, S. (2012) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1177/0748175612468594 · Cited by 10
Mun, E., Huo, Y., WHITE, H. R., Suzuki, S., & TORRE, J. D. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01328 · Cited by 10
Measuring Belief in Genetic Determinism: A Psychometric Evaluation of the PUGGS Instrument
Tornabene, R. E., Sbeglia, G. C., & Nehm, R. H. (2020) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-020-00146-2 · Cited by 10
The impact of mandatory economic education on adolescents’ attitudes
Oberrauch, L., & Seeber, G. (2021) · Education Economics · doi:10.1080/09645292.2021.1967294 · Cited by 10
Moosbrugger, H. (2008) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71635-8_10 · Cited by 10
From Track to Field: Trends in Career and Technical Education across Three Decades.
Dalton, B. W., Lauff, E. M., Henke, R. R., Alt, M. N., & Li, X. (2013) · Cited by 10
The IIS–32: A Brief Inventory of Interpersonal Strengths
Hatcher, R. L., & Rogers, D. T. (2012) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.681818 · Cited by 10
Dregan, A., Grieve, A., van Staa, T. P., & Gulliford, M. C. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-168 · Cited by 10
Vega, Y. L. P., Fernandez-Nieto, G. M., Baldiris, S., & Bolaños, J. C. G. (2012) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2012.6462377 · Cited by 10
Classification accuracy in Key Stage 2 National Curriculum tests in England
He, Q., Hayes, M., & Wiliam, D. (2013) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2012.754225 · Cited by 10
Wu, Q., Morgan, P. L., & Farkas, G. (2014) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932514547644 · Cited by 10
A Comparison of Item Selection Routines in Linear and Adaptive Tests
Schnipke, D. L., & Green, B. F. (1995) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1995.tb00464.x · Cited by 10
Magis, D. (2013) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12027 · Cited by 10
Oliveri, M. E., & von Davier, A. A. (2015) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1080/15305058.2015.1069743 · Cited by 10
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2013) · Cited by 10
Prince, R. N. (2018) · Cited by 10
Horton, M., REGISTRY Investigators of the European Huntington’s Disease Network, Nopoulos, P., Nance, M., Landwehrmeyer, G. B., Barker, R. A., Squitieri, F., Burgunder, J., & Quarrell, O. (2019) · Journal of Huntington s Disease · doi:10.3233/jhd-180306 · Cited by 10
Kyriakides, L. E., & Antoniou, P. (2009) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803610902955630 · Cited by 10
Validity issues concerning repeated test taking of the SweSAT
Törnkvist, B., & Henriksson, W. (2006) · Cited by 10
A Web-Based E-Testing System Supporting Test Quality Improvement
Costagliola, G., Ferrucci, F., & Fuccella, V. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78139-4_24 · Cited by 10
An Optimal Design Approach to Criterion-Referenced Computerized Testing
Wiberg, M. (2003) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986028002097 · Cited by 10
An Item Bank of Diabetes-Related Test Questions
Nowacek, G., & Pichert, J. W. (1985) · The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care · doi:10.1177/014572178501100306 · Cited by 10
Efficient Standard Error Formulas of Ability Estimators with Dichotomous Item Response Models
Magis, D. (2016) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-015-9443-3 · Cited by 9
Application of IRT Fixed Parameter Calibration to Multiple-Group Test Data
Kim, S., & Kolen, M. J. (2019) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2019.1660344 · Cited by 9
Mouratidis, A. A., Lens, W., & Sideridis, G. D. (2010) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2010.500281 · Cited by 10
Lokale Abhängigkeit von Items im TestDaF-Leseverstehen
Eckes, T. (2014) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000118 · Cited by 9
Rasch and Attitude Scales: Explanatory Style
Yates, S. M. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3076-2_12 · Cited by 9
Kirkegaard, E. O. W., & Fuerst, J. (2017) · Mankind Quarterly · doi:10.46469/mq.2017.57.4.4 · Cited by 12
Przepiórka, A., Błachnio, A., Jankowski, T., Mello, Z. R., & Worrell, F. C. (2021) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000671 · Cited by 9
Optimal Design for Item Calibration in Computerized Adaptive Testing: The 2PL Case
Buyske, S. G. (1998) · Lecture notes-monograph series · doi:10.1214/lnms/1215456191 · Cited by 9
Changes in Healthy Childhood Lifestyle Behaviors in Japanese Rural Areas
Nakano, T., Kasuga, K., Murase, T., & Suzuki, K. (2013) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/josh.12021 · Cited by 9
Wang, Z., Rohrer, D., Chuang, C.-C., Fujiki, M., Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2014) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2013.876230 · Cited by 9
Magis, D. (2013) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621613496890 · Cited by 9
PERBANDINGAN ESTIMASI KEMAMPUAN LATEN ANTARA METODE MAKSIMUM LIKELIHOOD DAN METODE BAYES
Retnawati, H. (2015) · Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan · doi:10.21831/pep.v19i2.5575 · Cited by 9
E-Learning Initiatives In E-Ducating Student Teachers
Pang, V., Wah, L. K., Keong, T. C., & Mohamed, S. (2005) · Cited by 9
Çeti̇n, B., & İlhan, M. (2017) · TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM · doi:10.15390/eb.2017.5082 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1985
- OpenAlex
- W2505213109
- Cited by
- 1,777
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- item response theory, psychometrics, measurement theory, test theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review