The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Item Response Theory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Item Response Theory (IRT), regarded as a modern test theory, models the probability of a correct response as a function of an examinee’s latent proficiency (θ) and item characteristics, independent of the specific test-taker sample—unlike Classical Test Theory, which yields sample-dependent scores24,25.”
From Leveraging computerized adaptive testing for cost-effective evaluation of large language models in medical benchmarking (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,001
THE MAXSLOPE TAXOMETRIC PROCEDURE: MATHEMATICAL DERIVATION, PARAMETER ESTIMATION, CONSISTENCY TESTS
Grove, W. M. (2004) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.95.2.517-550 · Cited by 17
New Looks in the Assessment of Cognitive Ability
Woodcock, R. W. (2002) · Peabody Journal of Education · doi:10.1207/s15327930pje7702_3 · Cited by 17
Zeger, L., & Thomas, N. (1997) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1997.10473993 · Cited by 17
Henning, G. H. (1988) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553228800500106 · Cited by 17
A Pearson-Type-VII Item Response Model for Assessing Person Fluctuation
Ferrando, P. J. (2007) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-004-1170-0 · Cited by 16
Huprich, S. K., Paggeot, A. V., & Samuel, D. B. (2014) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2014.946606 · Cited by 16
The Accuracy and Consistency of a Series of IRT True Score Equatings
Li, D., Jiang, Y., & von Davier, A. A. (2012) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00167.x · Cited by 16
Pandra, V., Sugiman, S., & Mardapi, D. (2017) · International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education · doi:10.29333/iejme/647 · Cited by 16
On the Importance of the Speed-Ability Trade-Off When Dealing With Not Reached Items
Tijmstra, J., & Bolsinova, M. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00964 · Cited by 16
Students’ Complex Problem Solving Profiles
Gnaldi, M., Bacci, S., Kunze, T., & Greiff, S. (2020) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-020-09709-2 · Cited by 16
Developing Instrument of Essay Test to Measure the Problem-Solving Skill in Physics
Aristiawan, A., & Istiyono, E. (2020) · Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia · doi:10.15294/jpfi.v16i2.24249 · Cited by 16
Liu, T., Wang, C., & Xu, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935419 · Cited by 16
Yau, D. T., Wong, M. C. M., Lam, K., & McGrath, C. P. J. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2133-3 · Cited by 16
Quigley, D. D., Jaycox, L. H., McCaffrey, D. F., & Marshall, G. N. (2006) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.21.5.597 · Cited by 17
Nugent, W. R. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405284032 · Cited by 16
The Development and Evaluation of a Computerized Adaptive Test of Tonal Memory
Vispoel, W. P. (1993) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.2307/3345403 · Cited by 16
BAYESIAN ITEM FIT ANALYSIS FOR DICHOTOMOUS ITEM RESPONSE THEORY MODELS
Sinharay, S. (2003) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2003.tb01926.x · Cited by 16
Luecht, R. M. (2003) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02142.x · Cited by 16
A Psychometric Study of the Infant and Toddler Intervals of the Social Emotional Assessment Measure
Squires, J., Waddell, M. L., Clifford, J. R., Funk, K., Hoselton, R. M., & Chen, C.-I. (2012) · Topics in Early Childhood Special Education · doi:10.1177/0271121412463445 · Cited by 16
Knowledge of Solution Strategies and IRT Modeling of Items for Transitive Reasoning
Sijtsma, K., & Verweij, A. C. (1999) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466219922031194 · Cited by 16
Fitness Portfolio Calibration for First- through Sixth-Grade Children
Kulinna, P. H., & Zhu, W. (2001) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2001.10608969 · Cited by 16
Kendhammer, L. K., Holme, T. A., & Murphy, K. L. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed4000298 · Cited by 15
Aoki, T., Yamamoto, Y., Shimizu, S., & Fukuhara, S. (2020) · Family Medicine and Community Health · doi:10.1136/fmch-2019-000234 · Cited by 15
Rasch Model for Assessing Propensity to Entomophagy
Iseppi, L., Rizzo, M., Gori, E., Nassivera, F., Bassi, I., & Scuderi, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084346 · Cited by 17
Ramnarain, U. D., Pieters, A., & Wu, H. (2021) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.20210701.oa8 · Cited by 16
Fleisher, I., Thompson, M. C., Mensah, C., Joseph, A. D., McLawhorn, A. S., Padgett, D. E., & Lyman, S. L. (2021) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.009 · Cited by 15
Estimating Standard Errors of Cut Scores for Item Rating and Mapmark Procedures
Yin, P., & Sconing, J. A. (2007) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164407301546 · Cited by 15
Measurement of Internet Addiction: An Item Response Analysis Approach
Zhang, J., & Xin, T. (2013) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0525 · Cited by 18
Relationship between perceived and actual frequency represented by common rating scale labels.
Woltz, D. J., Gardner, M. K., Kircher, J. C., & Burrow‐Sánchez, J. J. (2012) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0028693 · Cited by 15
Strauss, S. M., & Rindskopf, D. M. (2009) · Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care · doi:10.1177/1545109709350509 · Cited by 15
Genetic and environmental influences on item response pattern scalability
Waller, N. G., & Reise, S. P. (1992) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01066993 · Cited by 15
Common Item Equating Using the Loglinear Rasch Model
Kelderman, H. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164707 · Cited by 15
Sweet, K. M., Witt, L. A., & Shoss, M. K. (2015) · Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) · Cited by 15
Patton, K. A., Connor, J. P., Rundle-Thiele, S. R., Dietrich, T., Young, R. M., & Gullo, M. J. (2018) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.02.007 · Cited by 15
Boyd, A., Dodd, B., & Fitzpatrick, S. J. (2013) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765434 · Cited by 15
Customized Tests and Customized Norms
Linn, R. L., & Hambleton, R. K. (1991) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0403_1 · Cited by 15
Self-citationMeasurement equivalence of executives' performance ratings for same‐ and opposite‐gender dyads
Etchegaray, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1002/jls.20013 · Cited by 15
The Influence of the Presence of Deviant Item Score Patterns on the Power of a Person-Fit Statistic
Meijer, R. R. (1996) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169602000204 · Cited by 15
Advanced Psychometric Methods for Developing and Evaluating Cut-Point-Based Indicators
Carle, A. C., Blumberg, S. J., Moore, K. A., & Mbwana, K. (2010) · Child Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s12187-010-9075-1 · Cited by 15
Person Fit Across Subgroups: An Achievement Testing Example
Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A. (2001) · Lecture notes in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0169-1_20 · Cited by 15
Chung, K., Park, J. Y., Joung, D., & Jhung, K. (2019) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/14657 · Cited by 14
Construction of the Character Assessment Instrument for 21st Century Students in High Schools
Mistiani, W., Istiyono, E., & Syamsudin, A. (2022) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.935 · Cited by 14
An Aggregate IRT Procedure for Exploratory Factor Analysis
Camilli, G., & Fox, J. (2015) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/1076998615589185 · Cited by 14
Assessing electronic health record implementation challenges using item response theory.
Chan, K. S., Kharrazi, H. H. K., Parikh, M. A., & Ford, E. W. (2016) · PubMed · Cited by 14
Peterson, A. C., Sutherland, J. M., Liu, G., Crump, T., & Karimuddin, A. A. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1826-3 · Cited by 14
Robust Computerized Adaptive Testing
Veldkamp, B. P., & Verschoor, A. J. (2019) · Methodology of educational measurement and assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18480-3_15 · Cited by 14
Math elementary school exam analysis based on the Rasch model
Herwin, H., Tenriawaru, A., & Fane, A. (2019) · Jurnal Prima Edukasia · doi:10.21831/jpe.v7i2.24450 · Cited by 14
Identifying Annotator Bias: A new IRT-based method for bias identification
Amidei, J., Piwek, P., & Willis, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.421 · Cited by 14
Theory of mind development in impoverished U.S. children and six cross-cultural comparisons
Baker, E. R., Huang, R., Battista, C., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101314 · Cited by 18
An item response theory and Rasch analysis of the NUDKS: a data literacy scale
Trantham, P., Sikorski, J., Ayala, R. J. D., & Doll, B. J. (2021) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-021-09372-w · Cited by 16
Belief in territorial indivisibility and public preferences for dispute resolution
Fang, S., Li, X., Tago, A., & Chiba, D. (2022) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2022.19 · Cited by 14
Bechger, T. M., Kuijper, H., & Maris, G. (2009) · Language Assessment Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15434300802457521 · Cited by 14
An Assessment of the Nonparametric Approach for Evaluating the Fit of Item Response Models
Liang, T., Wells, C. S., & Hambleton, R. K. (2014) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/jedm.12031 · Cited by 14
Self-citationTailoring assessment of relationship distress using the Marital Satisfaction Inventory—Brief Form.
Balderrama‐Durbin, C. M., Snyder, D. K., & Balsis, S. M. (2015) · Couple and Family Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/cfp0000042 · Cited by 14
Shen, M., Cui, Y., Hu, M., & Xu, L. (2017) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12906-016-1518-x · Cited by 14
Leventhal, B. C., & Stone, C. A. (2018) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2018.1437306 · Cited by 14
Williamson, G. L. (2018) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2018.1464424 · Cited by 14
Causal Effects Based on Latent Variable Models
Mayer, A. (2019) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000174 · Cited by 14
Hori, K., Fukuhara, H., & Yamada, T. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.1543 · Cited by 14
Beliefs about perceived competence : A literature review
Sundström, A. E. (2006) · Cited by 14
Using Item Response Theory to Assess Effects of Mathematics Instruction in Special Populations
Cohen, A. S., Bottge, B. A., & Wells, C. S. (2001) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290106800102 · Cited by 14
The implementation of an adaptive test on the computer
Ju, G., & Bork, A. M. (2005) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2005.274 · Cited by 14
Superfine, A. C., Li, W., & Martinez, M. V. (2013) · Mathematics Teacher Educator · doi:10.5951/mathteaceduc.2.1.0042 · Cited by 14
A latent trait analysis of the eysenck personality questionnaire in an elderly community sample
Mackinnon, A. J., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H. M., Scott, L. R., Henderson, A. S., & Korten, A. E. (1995) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00011-t · Cited by 14
An investigation into the adequacy of three IRT models for data from two EFL reading tests
Choi, I.-C., & Bachman, L. F. (1992) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553229200900105 · Cited by 14
Stone, C. A., & Lane, S. (1991) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0402_3 · Cited by 14
A Partial Test of Hulin's Psychometric Theory of Measurement Equivalence in Translated Tests
Ellis, B. B. (1995) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759.11.3.184 · Cited by 14
Adapting and using U.S. measures to study Irish teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching
Delaney, S. (2008) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 14
Recent Advances in Quantitative Test Analysis
Bachmam, L. F., & Eignor, D. R. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4489-2_21 · Cited by 14
Evaluation of a Financial Literacy Test Using Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory
Kunovskaya, I., Cude, B. J., & Alexeev, N. (2014) · Journal of Family and Economic Issues · doi:10.1007/s10834-013-9386-8 · Cited by 13
The Impact of Item Format and Examinee Characteristics on Response Times
Hess, B., Johnston, M. M., & Lipner, R. S. (2013) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1080/15305058.2012.760098 · Cited by 13
Nagy, G., & Neumann, M. (2010) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92037-5_11 · Cited by 13
Performance of longitudinal item response theory models in shortened or partial assessments
Arrington, L., Ueckert, S., Ahamadi, M., Macha, S., & Karlsson, M. O. (2020) · Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics · doi:10.1007/s10928-020-09697-x · Cited by 13
Wesson, P., Lippman, S. A., Neilands, T. B., Ahern, J., Kahn, K., & Pettifor, A. E. (2021) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-021-03436-0 · Cited by 13
Wang, W. (2004) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164404268671 · Cited by 13
Cognitive diagnostic assessment via Bayesian evaluation of informative diagnostic hypotheses.
Hoijtink, H. J. A., Béland, S., & Vermeulen, J. A. (2013) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0034176 · Cited by 13
Using Information from Multiple-Choice Distractors to Enhance Cognitive-Diagnostic Score Reporting
Luecht, R. M. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611186.011 · Cited by 13
Fan, X., & Sun, S. (2013) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-404-8_3 · Cited by 13
Person Fit in Order-Restricted Latent Class Models
Emons, W. H. M., Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & Sijtsma, K. (2003) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621603259270 · Cited by 13
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo‐Seva, U. (2001) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131640121971473 · Cited by 13
Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J. (2008) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1080/15305050802262233 · Cited by 13
Increase in Precision when Estimating Parameters in Computer Assisted Testing Using Response Time
Gaviria, J. L. (2005) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-004-0437-y · Cited by 13
Computerized adaptive testing in computer science
Syang, A., & Dale, N. B. (1993) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/169070.169109 · Cited by 13
Adtest: A Computer-Adaptive Test Based on the Maximum Information Principle
Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Revuelta, J. (1994) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164494054003011 · Cited by 13
Fitting Logistic IRT Models: Small Wonder
García-Pérez, M. Á. (1999) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/s1138741600005473 · Cited by 13
Applying item response theory modeling in educational research
Le, D. (2013) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-3417 · Cited by 13
Rogers, H. J. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa169 · Cited by 13
Operational Issues in Computer‐Based Testing
Luecht, R. M. (2005) · doi:10.1002/9780470712993.ch5 · Cited by 13
Use of technology-based assessments: a systematic review covering over 30 countries
Chen, D., Jeng, A., Sun, S., & Kaptur, B. D. (2023) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2023.2270181 · Cited by 16
Miller, W. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5740-4 · Cited by 12
Elliott, S. N., Anthony, C. J., Lei, P., & DiPerna, J. C. (2021) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12615 · Cited by 12
A Nonparametric Multidimensional Latent Class IRT Model in a Bayesian Framework
Bartolucci, F., Farcomeni, A., & Scaccia, L. (2017) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-017-9576-7 · Cited by 12
Evaluating Manifest Monotonicity Using Bayes Factors
Tijmstra, J., Hoijtink, H. J. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2015) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-015-9475-8 · Cited by 12
Modern psychometrics applied in rheumatology–A systematic review
Siemons, L., ten Klooster, P. M., Taal, E., Glas, C. A. W., & van de Laar, M. A. (2012) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-216 · Cited by 12
TV parenting practices: is the same scale appropriate for parents of children of different ages?
Chen, T. A., O’Connor, T. M., Hughes, S. O., Frankel, L. A., Baranowski, J. C., Mendoza, J. A., Thompson, D. I., & Baranowski, T. (2013) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-41 · Cited by 12
Heuristic Constraint Management Methods in Multidimensional Adaptive Testing
Born, S., & Frey, A. (2016) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164416643744 · Cited by 12
Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing for Classifying Examinees With Within-Dimensionality
van Groen, M. M., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2016) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621616648931 · Cited by 12
Automated Test Assembly for Handling Learner Cold-Start in Large-Scale Assessments
Vie, J.-J., Popineau, F., Bruillard, É., & Bourda, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-017-0163-y · Cited by 12
Modeling language learning using specialized Elo rating
Hou, J., Koppatz, M., Quecedo, J. M. H., Stoyanova, N., & Yangarber, R. (2019) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4451 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1985
- OpenAlex
- W2505213109
- Cited by
- 1,777
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- item response theory, psychometrics, measurement theory, test theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review