The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Item Response Theory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Item Response Theory (IRT), regarded as a modern test theory, models the probability of a correct response as a function of an examinee’s latent proficiency (θ) and item characteristics, independent of the specific test-taker sample—unlike Classical Test Theory, which yields sample-dependent scores24,25.”
From Leveraging computerized adaptive testing for cost-effective evaluation of large language models in medical benchmarking (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,001
Do We Live in a ‘Post-Truth’ Era?
Ahlstrom‐Vij, K. (2021) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217211026427 · Cited by 26
Learning Trajectory of Item Response Theory Course Using Multiple Softwares
Retnawati, H. (2017) · OLYMPIADS IN INFORMATICS · doi:10.15388/ioi.2017.10 · Cited by 22
Chen, P., Callisaya, M. L., Wills, K. E., Greenaway, T. M., & Winzenberg, T. M. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267265 · Cited by 23
Multidimensional Adaptive Testing with Kullback–Leibler Information Item Selection
Mulder, J., & van der Linden, W. J. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8_4 · Cited by 22
Student assessment via graded response model
Matteucci, M., & Stracqualursi, L. (2008) · Statistica · doi:10.6092/issn.1973-2201/1216 · Cited by 22
COMPARISON OF UNIDIMENSIONAL AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACHES TO IRT PARAMETER ESTIMATION
Zhang, J. (2004) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2004.tb01971.x · Cited by 22
Automatic Generation of Rasch-Calibrated Items: Figural Matrices Test GEOM and Endless-Loops Test EC
Arendasy, M. E. (2005) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0503_2 · Cited by 22
Carlson, J. E., & von Davier, M. (2013) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02335.x · Cited by 22
Childs, R. A., & Oppler, S. H. (2000) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131640021971005 · Cited by 22
Computation and Statistical Inference for Decision Consistency Indexes Based on the Rasch Model
Huynh, H. (1990) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1165093 · Cited by 22
Frederking, V., Henschel, S., Meier, C., Roick, T., & Stanat, D. P. (2012) · L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature · doi:10.17239/l1esll-2012.01.02 · Cited by 22
The Multidimensional Structure of Math Anxiety Revisited
Henschel, S., & Roick, T. (2018) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000477 · Cited by 22
Item Response Theory for Efficient Human Evaluation of Chatbots
Sedoc, J., & Ungar, L. (2020) · Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems (Eval4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.eval4nlp-1.3 · Cited by 26
Application of a Multidimensional Nested Logit Model to Multiple-Choice Test Items
Bolt, D. M., Wollack, J. A., & Suh, Y. (2012) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-012-9257-5 · Cited by 22
Formulation and Application of the Generalized Multilevel Facets Model
Wang, W., & Liu, C. (2007) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164406296974 · Cited by 22
An Investigation of Lord's Procedure for the Detection of Differential Item Functioning
Kim, S., Cohen, A. S., & Kim, H.-O. (1994) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169401800303 · Cited by 22
Bartolucci, F., Pennoni, F., & Vittadini, G. (2016) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/1076998615622234 · Cited by 22
Clark, D. B., Martinez-Garza, M. M., Biswas, G., Luecht, R. M., & Sengupta, P. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_10 · Cited by 23
Exact and Best Confidence Intervals for the Ability Parameter of the Rasch Model
Klauer, K. C. (1991) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294489 · Cited by 22
The Changing Conception of Measurement in Education and Psychology
van der Linden, W. J. (1986) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168601000401 · Cited by 22
Item Analysis: Theory and Practice Using Classical and Modern Test Theory
Ellis, B. B., & Mead, A. D. (2004) · doi:10.1002/9780470756669.ch16 · Cited by 22
Wachowicz, T., Kersten, G. E., & Roszkowska, E. (2019) · Operational Research · doi:10.1007/s12351-018-00448-y · Cited by 21
Hori, K., Fukuhara, H., & Yamada, T. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.1531 · Cited by 21
Maul, A. (2011) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.588690 · Cited by 21
Şengül, Ö., Zhang, X., & Leroux, A. J. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Methodology · doi:10.12973/ijem.5.1.131 · Cited by 21
Kim, S., Moses, T. P., & Yoo, H. (2015) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12057 · Cited by 21
A logistic approach to knowledge structures
Stefanutti, L. (2006) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2006.07.003 · Cited by 21
Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F. A. (2000) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2000.tb01830.x · Cited by 21
Andriola, E., Donfrancesco, R., Zaninotto, S., Trani, M. D., Cruciani, A. C., Innocenzi, M., Marano, A., Pommella, L., & Cloninger, C. R. (2012) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.01.008 · Cited by 21
Comparison of Four IRT Models When Analyzing Two Tests for Inductive Reasoning
de Koning, E., Sijtsma, K., & Hamers, J. H. M. (2002) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621602026003005 · Cited by 21
Psychometric Analyses to Improve the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory
Bruijning, J. E., van Rens, G. H. M. B., Knol, D. L., & van Nispen, R. M. A. (2013) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0b013e318282cdce · Cited by 21
Chan, N., & Kennedy, P. (2002) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/j.2325-8012.2002.tb00469.x · Cited by 21
Nandakumar, R., Glutting, J. J., & Oakland, T. (1993) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/073428299301100201 · Cited by 21
MODELING THE MIXTURE OF IRT AND PATTERN RESPONSES BY A MODIFIED HYBRID MODEL1
Yamamoto, K., & Everson, H. T. (1995) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1995.tb01651.x · Cited by 21
Optimal Design of Tests with Dichotomous and Polytomous Items
Berger, M. P. F. (1998) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466216980223005 · Cited by 21
Integrating Temporal Information Into Knowledge Tracing: A Temporal Difference Approach
Zhu, J., Zang, Y., Qiu, H., & Zhou, T. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2833874 · Cited by 21
Assessing Fit of Item Response Models Using the Information Matrix Test
Ranger, J., & Kuhn, J. (2012) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00174.x · Cited by 20
The Brief Attachment Scale (BAS‐16): A short measure of infant attachment
Cadman, T., Belsky, J., & Fearon, P. R. M. (2018) · Child Care Health and Development · doi:10.1111/cch.12599 · Cited by 20
Understanding Test Takers' Choices in a Self-Adapted Test: A Hidden Markov Modeling of Process Data
Arieli‐Attali, M., Ou, L., & Simmering, V. R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00083 · Cited by 22
Bandeira, P. F. R., Duncan, M. J., Pessoa, M. L. F., Soares, Í. A. A., da Silva, L., Mota, J. A. P. S., & Martins, C. (2020) · Journal of Motor Learning and Development · doi:10.1123/jmld.2019-0040 · Cited by 20
Same‐Form Retest Effects on Credentialing Examinations
Raymond, M. R., Neustel, S., & Anderson, D. W. (2009) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00144.x · Cited by 20
Li, Y. H., & Lissitz, R. W. (2004) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2004.tb01109.x · Cited by 20
Yi, Q., Wang, T., & Ban, J. (2001) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01127.x · Cited by 20
Development and Psychometric Testing of the Nursing Culture Assessment Tool
Kennerly, S. M., Yap, T. L., Hemmings, A. B., Beckett, G. H., Schafer, J., & Borchers, A. (2012) · Clinical Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/1054773812440810 · Cited by 20
Park, Y. S., Lee, Y., & Xing, K. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00255 · Cited by 20
USING A NEW STATISTICAL MODEL FOR TESTLETS TO SCORE TOEFL
Wainer, H., & Wang, X. (2001) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2001.tb01851.x · Cited by 20
Weiss, D. J., & Vale, C. D. (1987) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1987.tb01190.x · Cited by 20
Kessler, R. C., & Mroczek, D. K. (1996) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00042.x · Cited by 20
Psychometric Properties of the Children’s Depression Inventory
Lee, Y., Krishnan, A., & Park, Y. S. (2011) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1177/0748175611428329 · Cited by 19
The Performance of Dimtest When Latent Trait and Item Difficulty Distributions Differ
Seraphine, A. E. (2000) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466216000241005 · Cited by 19
Arthurs, L. A., Hsia, J. F., & Schweinle, W. E. (2015) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.5408/14-061.1 · Cited by 19
Baghaei, P., & Ravand, H. (2016) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · Cited by 19
Dekkers, L. M. S., Bexkens, A., Hofman, A. D., de Boeck, P. A. L., d’Escury-Koenigs, A. L. C., & Huizenga, H. M. (2017) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191117698754 · Cited by 20
Task Characteristics and Calibration
Griffin, P., Care, E., & Harding, S.-M. E. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_7 · Cited by 21
Classical And Rasch Analyses Of Dichotomously Scored Reading Comprehension Test Items
Zubairi, A. M., & Kassim, N. L. A. (2016) · Malaysian Journal of ELT Research · Cited by 19
An Approach That Examines Sources of Misfit to Improve Performance Assessment Items and Rubrics
Parke, C. S. (2001) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15326977ea0703_02 · Cited by 19
Huynh, H. (2006) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00053.x · Cited by 19
Crunk, A. E., Burke, L. A., Neimeyer, R. A., Robinson, E. H., & Bai, H. (2019) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2019.1676323 · Cited by 18
Automated Assessment of Complex Programming Tasks Using SIETTE
Conejo, R., Barros, B., & Bertoa, M. F. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2018.2876249 · Cited by 19
Discriminating Quality of Hospital Care in the United States
Normand, S. T., Wolf, R. E., & McNeil, B. J. (2008) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x07312710 · Cited by 19
Item Response Theory Approaches to Test Scoring and Evaluating the Score Accuracy
Brown, A. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9781118489772.ch20 · Cited by 19
Studts, C. R., & van Zyl, M. A. (2013) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9738-8 · Cited by 19
Stark, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Guenole, N. (2010) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109356712 · Cited by 19
Ability Estimation Under Different Item Parameterization and Scoring Models
Si, C.-F., & Schumacker, R. E. (2004) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0402_3 · Cited by 18
Lee, M. K., Yost, K. J., McDonald, J. S., Dougherty, R. W., Vine, R., & Kallmes, D. F. (2017) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.01.002 · Cited by 18
Saarela, M., Yener, B., Zaki, M. J., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2016) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) · Cited by 18
Extreme Response Style: A Simulation Study Comparison of Three Multidimensional Item Response Models
Leventhal, B. C. (2018) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621618789392 · Cited by 18
Expected Classification Accuracy using the Latent Distribution
Guo, F. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/bxba-7466 · Cited by 18
A Latent Variable Model for Discrete Multivariate Psychometric Waiting Times
Douglas, J. A., Kosorok, M. R., & Chewning, B. A. (1999) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294320 · Cited by 18
Bacci, S., & Bartolucci, F. (2015) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.937376 · Cited by 18
Assessing Item Difficulty and Discrimination Indices of Teacher-Developed Multiple-Choice Tests
Khairani, A. Z., & Shamsuddin, H. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0908-2_35 · Cited by 18
Peterson, E. R., Mohal, J., Waldie, K. E., Reese, E., Carr, P. A., Grant, C. C., & Morton, S. (2017) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1288128 · Cited by 18
Cross-country gender DIF in PISA science literacy items
Cheema, J. (2017) · European Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17405629.2017.1358607 · Cited by 18
The Use of Computers in Assessment
Clauser, B. E., & Schuwirth, L. (2002) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0462-6_28 · Cited by 18
Assessing the Dimensionality and Factor Structure of Multiple-Choice Exams
Stone, C. A., & Yeh, C.-C. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282483 · Cited by 18
Noonan, B., Boss, M. W., & Gessaroli, M. E. (1992) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169201600405 · Cited by 18
Chen, S., Hou, L., Fitzpatrick, S. J., & Dodd, B. G. (1997) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164497057003004 · Cited by 18
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES
Sundström, A. E. (2005) · Cited by 18
Development of the Learning Potential Computerised Adaptive Test (Lpcat)
Beer, M. D. (2005) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/008124630503500407 · Cited by 18
Deville, C. W., & Chalhoub-Deville, M. B. (1993) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553229301000202 · Cited by 18
Performance Assessment: The State of the Art
Lane, S. (2010) · Cited by 18
Investigating the Dimensions of Spelling Ability
Notenboom, A., & Reitsma, P. H. (2003) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164403258442 · Cited by 18
Dean, K., & Salem, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.3.195 · Cited by 18
Item Response Modeling in Mplus: A Multi-Dimensional, Multi-Level, and Multi-Timepoint Example
Muth, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013) · Cited by 16
Arrom, L. M., Farrés, M. G., González, M., Palou, J., Smet, C. E., & Ramírez‐García, I. (2021) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01213-8 · Cited by 17
Kyriakides, L. E., Antoniou, P., & Dimosthenous, A. (2021) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2021.1923534 · Cited by 17
Ye, T., & Kolen, M. J. (2010) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00192.x · Cited by 17
An Extended Model of Literary Literacy
Meier, C., Roick, T., Henschel, S., Brüggemann, J., Frederking, V., Rieder, A., Gerner, V., & Stanat, P. (2017) · Methodology of educational measurement and assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_5 · Cited by 17
Item response theory models in the measurement theory
Brzezińska, J. (2018) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610918.2018.1546399 · Cited by 17
An Item Response Model for True–False Exams Based on Signal Detection Theory
DeCarlo, L. T. (2019) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621619843823 · Cited by 15
Performance of the S − χ 2 Statistic for Full-Information Bifactor Models
Li, Y., & Rupp, A. A. (2011) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164410392031 · Cited by 17
Student teachers’ mathematics attitudes, authentic investigations and use of metacognitive tools
Afamasaga-Fuata’i, K., & Sooaemalelagi, L. (2014) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-014-9270-y · Cited by 17
A Graphical Approach to Evaluating Equating Using Test Characteristic Curves
Wyse, A. E., & Reckase, M. D. (2010) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621610377082 · Cited by 17
A Mixture Cure-Rate Model for Responses and Response Times in Time-Limit Tests
Lee, Y., & Ying, Z. (2014) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9419-8 · Cited by 17
Accounting for the Relationship Between Initial Status and Growth in Regression Models
Kelly, S., & Ye, F. (2016) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2016.1160357 · Cited by 17
Moosbrugger, H. (2011) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20072-4_10 · Cited by 17
Retention and attrition of Irish as a second language
Murtagh, L. (2003) · Cited by 17
Qian, M., & Plucker, J. A. (2018) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2018.1488348 · Cited by 17
INFORMATION FUNCTIONS OF THE GENERALIZED PARTIAL CREDIT MODEL
Muraki, E. (1993) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1993.tb01538.x · Cited by 17
Chapter 6: Recent Developments in Item Response Theory with Implications for Teacher Certification
Mislevy, R. J. (1987) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x014001239 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1985
- OpenAlex
- W2505213109
- Cited by
- 1,777
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- item response theory, psychometrics, measurement theory, test theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review