Cited by 46Plant tissue culture and regenerationEpigenetics and DNA MethylationPlant Molecular Biology Research

Epigenetic changes and their relationship to somaclonal variation: A need to monitor the micropropagation of plantation crops

Azizi, Parisa, Hanafi, Mohamed M., Sahebi, Mahbod, Harikrishna, Jennifer A., Taheri, Sima, Yassoralipour, Ali, Nasehi, Abbas·2020·Functional Plant Biology

Abstract

Chromatin modulation plays important roles in gene expression regulation and genome activities. In plants, epigenetic changes, including variations in histone modification and DNA methylation, are linked to alterations in gene expression. Despite the significance and potential of in vitro cell and tissue culture systems in fundamental research and marketable applications, these systems threaten the genetic and epigenetic networks of intact plant organs and tissues. Cell and tissue culture applications can lead to DNA variations, methylation alterations, transposon activation, and finally, somaclonal variations. In this review, we discuss the status of the current understanding of epigenomic changes that occur under in vitro conditions in plantation crops, including coconut, oil palm, rubber, cotton, coffee and tea. It is hoped that comprehensive knowledge of the molecular basis of these epigenomic variations will help researchers develop strategies to enhance the totipotent and embryogenic capabilities of tissue culture systems for plantation crops.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/fp19077

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epigenetic variability observed at the phenotype level reflects adaptations of cellular processes to constraints of in vitro cultivation, which usually implies sequential dedifferentiation and re-differentiation.

    “This epigenetic variability, which frequently is observed at phenotype level, reflects, in reality, the adaptations of the cellular processes to the various constraints of the in vitro cultivation technology, that usually implies sequential dedifferentiation (formation of callus) and re-differentiation (regeneration of plants) [91,95,96,97,98,99,100].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azizi, P., Hanafi, M. M., Sahebi, M., Harikrishna, J. A., Taheri, S., Yassoralipour, A., & Nasehi, A.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
  • University of Malaya (MY)
  • Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (MY)
Corresponding author
Hanafi, Mohamed M.
Venue
Functional Plant Biology
Published
2020-04-30
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
508-523
ISSN
  • 1445-4408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-4416
OpenAlex
W3022602000
Cited by
46
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Functional Plant Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
epigenetic modifications, somaclonal variation, micropropagation, histone modifications, DNA methylation, transposon activation, plantation crops, coconut, oil palm, rubber, cotton, coffee, tea, totipotency, embryogenic capacity, in vitro culture
MeSH terms
Chromatin, Crops, Agricultural, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Epigenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review