Cited by 328Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Alzheimer's disease affects limbic nuclei of the thalamus

Braak, H., Braak, E.·1991·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

Sensitive silver techniques for amyloid and neurofibrillary changes were applied to examine the pathological changes revealed by limbic nuclei of the thalamus in Alzheimer's disease. Large numbers of extracellular amyloid deposits occurred in almost all thalamic nuclei. The antero-ventral nucleus harbored numerous large globular patches, other areas contained more densely packed and smaller deposits, while narrow zones of gray matter subjacent to the ependymal lining of the third ventricle remained virtually devoid of amyloid. Intraneuronal neurofibrillary changes were encountered in the form of distended argyrophilic processes covering the medial convexity of the antero-ventral nucleus. Similar structures, although in considerably lesser density, occurred in the laterally adjoining reticular nucleus. The anterior nuclear complex, the latero-dorsal nucleus, portions of the intralaminar complex, the paraventricular and reuniens nucleus contained numerous neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads. The antero-dorsal nucleus showed the most severe involvement. At first glance, the thalamus appeared to be only mildly affected by Alzheimer's disease. Closer inspection revealed that severe changes were confined to only a few limbic nuclei. These changes were virtually identical in amount, type and location in all cases of severe Alzheimer's disease studied. It is assumed that these changes considerably hamper the transport of information through limbic circuits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00305867

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prominence of thalamic ROIs is consistent with their roles in AD.

    “The prominence of thalamic ROIs is consistent their roles in AD67,68,69.”
  • Tangles are first seen in the entorhinal cortex (Braak stages I-II), then the hippocampus and thalamus (Braak stages III-IV) and finally the neocortex (Braak stages V-VI), a sequence typically synchronous with cognitive decline from mild cognitive impairment to severe dementia.

    “Tangles are first seen in the entorhinal cortex (EC) (Braak stages I–II), then the hippocampus and thalamus (Braak stages III–IV) and finally the neocortex (Braak stages V–VI), a sequence that is typically synchronous with cognitive decline from mild cognitive impairment to severe dementia1,2,4–7.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braak, H., & Braak, E.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
1991-02
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
261-268
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W1990264298
Cited by
328
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, thalamus, amyloid deposits, neurofibrillary tangles, reticular nucleus, neuropil threads, limbic circuits, silver staining
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Dementia, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Limbic System, Male, Middle Aged, Neurons, Reticular Formation, Staining and Labeling, Thalamic Nuclei

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review