Cited by 42Thermoregulation and physiological responsesBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationUrban Heat Island Mitigation

Thermal comfort conditions during day and night

Fanger, P. O., �stberg, O., McK. Nicholl, A. G., Breum, N. O., Jerking, E.·1974·European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00430233

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The assumption in thermal comfort prescriptions is primarily based on thermal comfort studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s.

    “This assumption is primarily based on thermal comfort studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s [12–17].”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

  • Results from at least four other studies seem to contradict the tendency to prefer higher temperatures in the early evening.

    “However, the results from at least four other studies [12–17] seem to contradict these results.”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

  • Among the 15 reviewed experimental studies investigating diurnal variations in thermal perception, six found no significant differences in thermal perception.

    “Among the 15 reviewed experimental studies investigating diurnal variations in thermal perception, six found no significant differences in thermal perception [12–17,78]”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

  • Fanger and colleagues' second experiment found no significant difference in mean preferred temperatures between late afternoon and late night.

    “again found no significant difference in the mean preferred temperatures [14].”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

  • Past thermal comfort studies, including some reviewed here, have highlighted that variance in the thermal sensory response is greater in female versus male subjects.

    “Past thermal comfort studies, including some of those reviewed here [12–17], already highlighted that variance in the thermal sensory response is greater in female versus male subjects.”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fanger, P. O., �stberg, O., McK. Nicholl, A. G., Breum, N. O., & Jerking, E.
Affiliations
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
Published
1974
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
255-263
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-5548
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2077543989
Cited by
42
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Keywords
thermal comfort, time of day, rectal temperature, skin temperature, metabolic rate, evaporative heat loss, sedentary subjects, diurnal variation
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Temperature, Body Weight, Circadian Rhythm, Consumer Behavior, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Rectum, Skin Temperature, Sweating, Temperature, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review