The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unreliable probabilities, risk taking, and decision making
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
“Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.”
Ellsberg, D. (1961) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884324 · Cited by 7,891
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.
Hutchison, T. W., & Popper, K. R. (1959) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2550489 · Cited by 7,499
Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping
Dempster, A. P. (1967) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177698950 · Cited by 6,126
Logical Foundations of Probability.
Burks, A. W., & Carnap, R. (1951) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2021419 · Cited by 2,370
Statistical Decision Functions
Wald, A. (1949) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730030 · Cited by 2,176
Lindley, D. V., & Savage, L. J. (1973) · The Mathematical Gazette · doi:10.2307/3615588 · Cited by 1,943
Consistency in Statistical Inference and Decision
Smith, C. A. B. (1961) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1961.tb00388.x · Cited by 557
On Indeterminate Probabilities
Levi, I. (1974) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2025161 · Cited by 543
What Price Ambiguity? or the Role of Ambiguity in Decision-Making
Becker, S. W., & Brownson, F. O. (1964) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/258854 · Cited by 373
Cited by
Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity
Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122575 · Cited by 1,795
Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty
Heath, C., & Tversky, A. (1991) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00057884 · Cited by 1,654
A LOGIC FOR UNCERTAIN PROBABILITIES
JØSANG, A. (2001) · International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1142/s0218488501000831 · Cited by 1,008
Frisch, D., & Baron, J. (1988) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960010303 · Cited by 451
Consequentialist foundations for expected utility
Hammond, P. J. (1988) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/bf00129168 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- G�rdenfors, P., & Sahlin, N.-E.
- Venue
- Synthese
- Published
- 1982-12
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361-386
- ISSN
- 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0964
- OpenAlex
- W4233281713
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unreliable probabilities, risk taking, and decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00486156
- The paper
- G�rdenfors, P., & Sahlin, N.-E. (1982). Unreliable probabilities, risk taking, and decision making. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00486156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
