Cited by 40Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionDiabetes Treatment and Management

Primary prevention of Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus

Open access
King, H., Dowd, J. E.·1990·Diabetologia

Abstract

Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus is the major form of the disease in all societies. Its public health impact appears to be increasing and the greatest genetic predisposition to the disease is encountered in developing communities. The reduction or elimination of disease in whole populations is a fundamental goal in public health. Whilst several factors are associated with the development of Type 2 diabetes, it is not clear how they cause the disease, if indeed they do, nor whether they act in the same way in all populations. Risk factors may be true determinants of a disease but alternatively they may be associated with its occurrence only by virtue of an innocent relationship with the true causes. Furthermore, known risk factors usually explain only a small proportion of any chronic disease. The role of risk factors in disease causation is therefore of fundamental importance in considering disease prevention. Two alternative strategies for prevention of disease in populations have been proposed. The population strategy seeks to remove the causes of disease in communities as a whole, whilst the high-risk strategy aims to identify subjects at increased risk, and to intervene selectively. The population approach should be tried and carefully evaluated in selected communities at above-average risk of several noncommunicable diseases. However, certain epidemiological features of Type 2 diabetes, including the distributional characteristics of glycaemia and the complications of hyperglycaemia, the clustering of cardiovascular risk factors in the diabetic subpopulation, as well as uncertainties over the causal nature of known risk factors, suggest that a high-risk approach to prevention is also appropriate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00586454

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, H., & Dowd, J. E.
Affiliations
World Health Organization (CH)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
1990-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
3-8
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W1963600334
Cited by
40
References
26
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, primary prevention, risk factors, etiology, population-based prevention, non-communicable diseases, hyperglycemia, cardiovascular risk factors, genetic susceptibility, developing countries
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Primary Prevention, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review