Cited by 155Aging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesHealth and Well-being Studies

Peer support telephone dyads for elderly women: Was this the wrong intervention?

Heller, Kenneth, Thompson, Mark G., Trueba, Petri E., Hogg, John R., Vlachos-Weber, Irene·1991·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Tested a preventive intervention in which peer telephone dyads were developed for low-income, community-living, elderly women with low perceived social support. After an initial assessment, respondents were randomly assigned to either an assessment-only control or received 10 weeks of friendly staff telephone contact. After a second assessment, participants receiving the staff contact were randomly assigned to continue that contact or were paired in dyads to continue phone contact with one another. Dependent variables were measures of perceived social support, morale, depression, and loneliness. All groups, particularly the staff contact group, showed some improvement in mental health scores over time, but there were no significant differences between intervention groups, or between intervention and assessment-only control groups. The results suggest that participation in the study and in personal assessment interviews at home were probably morale enhancing, and that additional telephone contact did not significantly add to that effect. Evidence also indicates that, in this sample, low perceived family support was significantly related to poor mental health, so it is possible that a program designed to increase friend support may have been the wrong intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00942253

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heller, K., Thompson, M. G., Trueba, P. E., Hogg, J. R., & Vlachos-Weber, I.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Heller, Kenneth
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
53-74
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W2058361378
Cited by
155
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh015789-14, 1r01mh041457-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH 15789-11, R01MH41457)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
peer support, older women, low-income elderly, perceived social support, preventive interventions, morale, depression, loneliness, family support, mental health, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Aged, Family, Female, Humans, Peer Group, Poverty, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Hotlines, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review