Cited by 479Aging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesHealth disparities and outcomes

Interventions to reduce social isolation amongst older people: where is the evidence?

FINDLAY, ROBYN A.·2003·Ageing and Society

Abstract

As the population ages and more people are living alone, social isolation amongst older people is emerging as one of the major issues facing the industrialised world because of the adverse impact it can have on health and wellbeing. This article reviews the empirical literature published over the last 20 years on the effectiveness of interventions that target social isolation amongst older people. The results reveal that although numerous such interventions have been implemented worldwide, there is very little evidence to show that they work. It is concluded that future intervention programmes aimed at reducing social isolation should have evaluation built into them at inception, and that the results of the evaluation studies, whether positive or negative, should be widely disseminated. Where possible, as a cost-effective measure, pilot or demonstration projects should precede these interventions. Some key elements of successful interventions to counter social isolation amongst older people are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x03001296

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A functional magnetic resonance imaging study found that lonely individuals showed less activation in the ventral striatum in response to positive social stimuli compared with nonlonely individuals.

    “a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study found that lonely individuals showed less activation in the ventral striatum in response to positive social stimuli compared with nonlonely individuals [31].”
  • Three previous systematic reviews have synthesised evidence on the effectiveness of interventions targeting social isolation in older people.

    “Three previous systematic reviews [5,40,41] have synthesised the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions targeting social isolation in older people.”
  • While interventions targeting social isolation include some of the beneficial characteristics identified in this and previous systematic reviews, none appear to include all of them.

    “While interventions targeting social isolation include some of the beneficial characteristics identified in this and previous systematic reviews [5,40], none appear to include all of them.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FINDLAY, R. A.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
FINDLAY, ROBYN A.
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
2003-09
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
647-658
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W2117614628
Cited by
479
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 19
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social isolation, older adults, intervention, population aging, living alone, intervention effectiveness, program evaluation, pilot project, health and well-being, evidence-based policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review