Cited by 28Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Evaluation and Management of Erectile Dysfunction

Burnett, Arthur L.·2012·Campbell-Walsh Urology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-1-4160-6911-9.00024-4

Cites

335 of 335 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 336 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burnett, A. L.
Corresponding author
Burnett, Arthur L.
Venue
Campbell-Walsh Urology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2012
Pages
721-748.e7
OpenAlex
W2485044347
Cited by
28
References
336
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
9.98
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, diagnosis, management, sexual dysfunction, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, vacuum systems, penile prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review