The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An index of goodness-of-fit based on noncentrality
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bozdogan, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294361 · Cited by 4,468
The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-Fit Indices
HOELTER, J. W. (1983) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124183011003003 · Cited by 1,624
Cited by
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 · Cited by 16,280
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
Chen, F. F. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701301834 · Cited by 12,217
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64 · Cited by 4,734
Self-citationPutnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 · Cited by 4,369
Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000006288127 · Cited by 4,087
Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0014694 · Cited by 2,242
Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.
Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568 · Cited by 1,668
Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke‐Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer‐Loeber, M., & Liu, J. (2006) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.20115 · Cited by 1,652
Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: some support for the N:q hypothesis
Jackson, D. L. (2003) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1001_6 · Cited by 1,254
Russell, D. W. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616702237645 · Cited by 954
Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007 · Cited by 906
Fit Indices Versus Test Statistics
Yuan, K.-H. (2005) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4001_5 · Cited by 415
A new strategy for testing structural equation models
Moshagen, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2016) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.950896 · Cited by 321
semPower: General power analysis for structural equation models
Moshagen, M., & Bader, M. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02254-7 · Cited by 308
“Note that the minimized sample value of the fitting function, ̂ F , is a biased estimate of F 0 (McDonald, 1989) with an expected value of F 0 + df / ( N − 1).”
BackgroundOn the use of confirmatory factor analysis in personality research
Raykov, T. (1998) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00159-1 · Cited by 112
Varni, J. W., Beaujean, A. A., & Limbers, C. A. (2013) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0370-4 · Cited by 56
Abad, F. J., Sorrel, M. A., Román, F. J., & Colom, R. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000228 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, R. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Classification
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-103
- ISSN
- 0176-4268 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1343
- OpenAlex
- W1967694172
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
