The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development
GILLIGAN, C. (1993) · doi:10.4159/9780674037618 · Cited by 9,127
Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct
Pajares, M. F. (1992) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543062003307 · Cited by 9,007
Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years; A Scheme
Perry, W. G. (1970) · Cited by 4,174
Mathematical Problem Solving: Current Themes, Trends, and Research
(2019) · ICME-13 Monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6 · Cited by 2,696
Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension.
Schommer, M. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.82.3.498 · Cited by 2,214
Self-citationStudents' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research
Lederman, N. G. (1992) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660290404 · Cited by 2,169
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-05012-8 · Cited by 1,934
Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years.
Perry, & William, G. (1970) · Cited by 1,817
Belenky, M. F. (1986) · Cited by 1,624
Cited by
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543067001088 · Cited by 3,181
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8 · Cited by 1,529
Individual differences in rational thought.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.127.2.161 · Cited by 867
Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.89.2.342 · Cited by 729
Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning
Chan, K.-W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.002 · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Schommer, M.
- Venue
- Educational Psychology Review
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 293-319
- ISSN
- 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-336X
- OpenAlex
- W1997859089
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02213418
- The paper
- Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02213418
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.