Cited by 112Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Naloxone disrupts the expression but not the acquisition by male rats of a conditioned place preference response for an oestrous female

Mehrara, B. J., Baum, M. J.·1990·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the possible role of endogenous opioid peptides in the regulation of masculine sexual reward. In experiment 1 sexually experienced male rats, which had recently been castrated or left gonadally intact, were allowed to mate with an oestrous female in an initially "non-preferred" chamber of a test apparatus. On alternate days these males were placed alone in the initially "preferred" chamber of the same apparatus. After eight such conditioning sessions both intact and castrated males had acquired a conditioned place preference (CPP) for the initially "non-preferred" chamber whereas control males, which were never given access to an oestrous female, showed no evidence of a significant shift in their preference for either chamber. Administration of the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone (1 or 5 mg/kg, SC) prior to each conditioning session had no significant influence on the acquisition of a CPP for an oestrous female. By contrast, in experiment 2 naloxone treatment significantly attenuated the expression of a previously established CPP for an oestrous female in both gonadally intact and castrated males. The results suggest that opioid components of neural reward circuits are normally activated in the male rat by conditioned incentive stimuli, but not by the primary rewarding stimuli associated with access to and mating with an oestrous female.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02253728

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When rats mate, they associate ejaculation reward with non-social cues and can form preferences for location or non-social odors.

    “Instead, when rats mate, they associate the reward from ejaculation with non-social cues and can form preferences for the location or for non-social odors (Miller and Baum 1987; Mehrara and Baum 1990; Ismail et al 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehrara, B. J., & Baum, M. J.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1990-05
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
118-125
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2080791095
Cited by
112
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-00392)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD21094, R01HD021094)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
naloxone, conditioned place preference, estrous females, endogenous opioids, opioid antagonism, castration, reward systems, mating behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Operant, Estrus, Female, Male, Naloxone, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review