The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes
Jonassen, D. H. (1997) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299613 · Cited by 1,608
Peer interaction and learning in small groups
Webb, N. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 · Cited by 1,050
Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02505026 · Cited by 512
Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student-Generated Questioning
King, A. (1992) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8 · Cited by 359
Cited by
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006 · Cited by 310
A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition
Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.838920 · Cited by 306
Kim, J. Y., & Lim, K. Y. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.001 · Cited by 120
Chien, C.-C., Chan, H.-Y., & Hou, H.-T. (2025) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2024.2338085 · Cited by 90
Ding, H. (2008) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088307308660 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Xun, G., & Land, S. M.
- Venue
- Educational Technology Research and Development
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 5-22
- ISSN
- 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6501
- OpenAlex
- W2005612834
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
